Jump to content

Would lte rollout be quicker if light squared was allowed to use their spectrum?

Recommended Posts

None that I know of. Are you thinking of SDARS (e.g. Sirius XM) terrestrial repeaters?




He may be thinking of Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS). I really don't know much about it, but its growing in aviation. Essentially, this system uses ground based reference stations to measure variation/deviation in GPS signals, as a result making GPS more accurate. It will allow aircraft to make precision approaches with GPS, which, before, GPS was limited to non-precision approaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that is why I love this site... ask a question, get all possible answers.


For the record, I was thinking that the ground based system would have a stronger signal and therefore be used instead of the satellite GPS signal, which would still be useful for aircraft and in rural areas where the L-band spectrum was not deployed.


I guess now the question becomes: is there another similar sized amount of unused (or easily convertible) spectrum that they can swap for Lightsquared's? Also, what can this spectrum be used for in the future? Is it enough spectrum for another satellite tv provider? Is there something that it ideally should be used for?

Another question: if they can swap the spectrum and quickly go to market, will sprint be the likely partner because of their past relations & NV's hosting abilities, or will the process start over again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Yet another "Carrier" move: T-Mobile users have only now discovered sneaky change made in May
    • Went to Hurricane Harbor again this past weekend, this time testing Verizon and T-Mobile. In my testing, Verizon is now the fastest carrier, at least on the Hurricane Harbor sector. Despite it being pretty overcast on Saturday with temperatures in the mid-80's the park was at full capacity.  Verizon had 160MHz of n77 and T-Mobile now has 160MHz of n41. On LTE I was seeing speeds in the range of 50-100Mbps while T-Mobile's LTE on was completely swamped, barely crossing 3Mbps. While both carriers only have a single high capacity sector (facing Great Adventure, Verizon benefits from having CBRS deployed on all sectors. This is an extra 60-100MHz of capacity that T-Mobile doesn't have. Maybe when T-Mobile gets around to deploying their C-band we'll see a boost in speeds again to be more competitive with Verizon. On the 5G side of things, T-Mobile's speeds were just over half that of Verizon.  That said, neither carrier was slow and I had zero issue using Xbox Cloud Gaming on T-Mobile despite their weaker upload speeds and higher ping.  
    • I think the newer ones have signal bars on them. I took a photo of one in Red Hook a month or two ago that had the same design.
    • Well well, looks like we found one of the two Link5G towers that might actually have 5G. Notice anything different? This one has the same signal bars icon that the pole mounted 5G oDAS units have. It’s in Chinatown at East Broadway and Forsyth St. It’s impossible to tell what carrier it is, though.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...