Jump to content

Sprint LTE VS Verizon LTE speed test


Recommended Posts

If Sprint switches from unlimited to 5GB...and starts allowing tethering as part of that 5GB...I'll still stick with them. Sure, 5GB is less than unlimited, but that amount of data is reasonable, even if I decide to broadcast an hour-long event via LTE on UStream once a week...yeah, between that and Google+ photo uploads, I have one of Fort Worth's LTE towers a bit of a workout. My usage will taper off now but I'm up to 2.23GB of 4G data, 277MB of 3G and 446MB of tethering (mostly on 4G).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the bad press Sprint is taking, the only way for them to attract more customers is to keep unlimited data around. Once the network vision project is done and (hopefully) Sprint has the best, most reliable network out there, they can drop unlimited data and feel confident that they can keep their customers and continue to attract more customers away from other carriers. I can't imagine that happening until at least late 2014. Unlimited data could close the gap between the duopoly and Sprint.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint will evaluate unlimited annually. And as long as it gives them differentiation and new customers keep citing it as the reason for coming over, then you can expect it to stay.

 

Sprint has no short term problems or even midterm network/spectrum issues that would require them to drop unlimited.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint will evaluate unlimited annually. And as long as it gives them differentiation and new customers keep citing it as the reason for coming over, then you can expect it to stay.

 

Sprint has no short term problems or even midterm network/spectrum issues that would require them to drop unlimited.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

May it never go away and why is it verizon the only one with lte in seattle? Seems kinda fishy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

May it never go away and why is it verizon the only one with lte in seattle? Seems kinda fishy.

 

Fishy? How so? Like, as in a conspiracy?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fishy? How so? Like' date=' as in a conspiracy?

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner[/quote']

 

Don't get me going on conspiracies... lol

 

Were you at pike place market? Is that why it's fishy?

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line I think sprint Is gonna keep unlimited on the simple fact its what customers want kind of like old country buffet or golden corral there popular because they offer the same food for a certain price and offer it unlimited

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well when golden corral runs out of food, people go somewhere else.

 

Last I hear golden corral is still in business ...and now im hungry. Now on the other hand...if they were not an "all you can eat buffet" I might elect to eat else where.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not think unlimited data will last forever, but I do not think overburdened network will be the cause. I think increase profits will be the main factor in switching away. Verizon's new lowest plan is 90 bucks. That is going to shoot up ARPU as people move towards those plans. I believe they will switch to their own version of ShareEverything. They will probably charge 30 per phone and start at 3 or 4GBs for what ATT/Verizon charge for 1Gb.

 

I agree that they will also change their plans, but I believe that they will keep both the personal and family plan unlimited accounts. Marketing and customer psyche is very important even if they do not all use it, the option to switch to the plan is there.

 

The unlimited plans will still be a difference maker, but the price might move up as people are able to use more over the new network. People that are not in range of clearwire's wimax I'm sure that they have trouble going over 2GB anyway, so they are not worrying too much about the increase in costs of unlimited right now.

I would expect them to also drop the tiered phone pricing, unless they also find a way to include video calls (which I do not like the idea of, and will be hacked around)... Anyway, I would expect them to increase the cost for unlimited at least $10 higher then the basic unlimited package that they offer now.

 

That would make an unlimited plan cost around $100 per person after taxes, but with no overages, it will remain popular... and they should include 1GB of tethering/hotspot, with a cheap $5/GB option to add additional tethering/hotspot data. This will increase the usage of the feature, instead the current $30 incentive to find another way around the carrier charges.

 

After that, they should really crush the other shared plans, making 5GB the lowest tier, and having an unlimited option for the same approx price of the other companies highest tier. Also, they should have a simple pricing for going over the limit ($5/GB) That would be charged more as a 'pay for use' than an 'overage' charge. Some people might not get this, but if people do not fear the overage charge, there is more chance of making money off of it. If people try and avoid going over their allotted data limit, the company will not realize the profit from it. Sprint can look like the company that "isn't out to screw its customers" and even without everyone on an unlimited data plan, they can still increase their ARPU's and keep their great customer service record.

 

One of sprint's advantages right now is that plans are simple, and people feel that it is a good value compared to the duolopy of At&Vzw. But the other advantage is that it costs less when you do not have to track every customer... if this is implemented correctly, they should be able to save money on operational costs over their rivals.

 

These are just my opinions, but if there was an option to send suggestions to sprint, I would like them to hear it.

 

well when golden corral runs out of food, people go somewhere else.

 

You shouldn't compare the 2 things directly... I hate buffets because they usually have crappy food (and yes, although golden corral is the best buffet, buffets have lower quality food than other restaurants) and I do not usually eat more than I would get at a regular restaurant.

Data usage is slightly different now, but after NV is complete within 2 years, data speeds and coverage for 90% of all Americans will be similar across all carriers. So there will be no difference in the 'entree', and there is always room for more data! lol. So sprint's marketing will be VERY important in the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no real good way to compare these 2 phones and their speeds. The Rezound is on Gingerbread and reports signal differently than a phone on ICS. Signal "bars" are a generalization of a fairly wide signal variance. You could have 2 bars and -112 dBm on one and 2 bars and -104 dBm on the other. At that signal strength, the LTE performance is degrading rapidly and it's hard to make a fair comparison. Add in that the EVO LTE was experiencing issues connecting to LTE and may or may not be fixed, and you really just have numbers.

 

Sorry to rain on the parade, but I don't know how much stock we can put in speed comparison numbers.

 

I did some comparision speed test on a wifi network and both phones were very close to the same for upload and download. I think the test is a valid comparision of the speed difference between to to carriers. Granted, it is 1 test, so more samples would be needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I did some comparision speed test on a wifi network and both phones were very close to the same for upload and download. I think the test is a valid comparision of the speed difference between to to carriers. Granted' date=' it is 1 test, so more samples would be needed.[/quote']

 

The WiFi network is coming from the same source and should be at about the same signal strength. Sprint and Verizon are likely in different locations, using different frequency, and the phones are likely reporting signal strength differently. The tests are far from scientific and you would probably need around 50 tests to get an idea of network speeds, but it would likely only reflect which carrier had stronger signal in the areas the speed tests were run.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Last I hear golden corral is still in business ...and now im hungry. Now on the other hand...if they were not an "all you can eat buffet" I might elect to eat else where.

Exactly lol and old country buffet is way better than golden corral IMHO but sprint needs unlimited data

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Just installed the update, and it's good!  As you recommended, I turned off both TA adjustments, and turned on displaying it when it's zero.  The value is basically spot-on.  It's bouncing between 18 and 19 for the Cameron Valley site, and it is in fact between 0.87 and 0.92 miles, as displayed in the app.  This is probably a better estimate of the TA values than any other device I own provides. As far as the -44 goes, I'll have to take it out and verify that it no longer records those cases. If this device didn't have that annoying reset problem, and got the Android 14 update (and in so doing supported TA on NR and continued to allow band locking), it would easily be the best device I own.  Easily.  And would be the device I standardize on for the 5G era.  I'll probably have to wait for a future device to come out with Android 14 and then see what happens. And I know I didn't have to, but I love SCP.  It is my primary tool for tracking the goings-on of the various networks and is very easy to use and work with across my 10 phones.  I am very happy to send a token of my appreciation your way now and then.  Thanks again! - Trip
    • Sorry, I misread your message -- yes, the app would show 0 if an invalid value was being reported. I don't think I had any MediaTek devices myself, but the beta testers have had a decent variety of devices over the years.   Sorry, I didn't word that very well in my last post -- I added an option to control display of LTE TA when it is 0. By default it will now be hidden (sadly a lot of devices do not show it) but anyone who wants to display it can adjust accordingly. There will be 3 user-selectable options related to LTE TA now -- the existing correction option, correction on LTE-TDD (which is independent/in addition to the existing correction option), and TA:0 display. In your case, I'd disable the TDD option and enable the TA:0 option; the defaults will be the opposite of what I think you need.   You did not have to do that, but I sincerely appreciate it, thank you! Beta update is rolling out now, let me know how it goes.
    • In order: This is very helpful to know.  Thanks. That makes a lot of sense, though it's showing me zero rather than nothing; it looks like if it's calculating a negative number, I'm seeing zero instead.  It makes me wonder how many devices you've tested against which use the MediaTek chipset.  This is only the second one I've used, and the first one was very, very old (didn't have B41), so it's possible that the MediaTek chip doesn't need the correction while others do.  Separately, I doubt that a real world case will ever see 1282, so I imagine any value above 1281 could be ignored. I would ask you to please not hide TA values of 0, or if you hide them by default, add an option to not hide them.  I am aware that, for example, the S22 doesn't report a valid TA value and always reports zero, but zero is a legitimate value and is useful to know when trying to identify sites. I'll look forward to your impending update, and I'm going to send along another donation if I can find the link.  Thanks so much, as always!  - Trip
    • I received the reports, thanks! You didn't catch it happening (it captures the diagnostics as soon as you hit send or long-click the connection banner on the main screen), and I had sent you an e-mail to clarify which value was -3.. but your screenshots confirmed my hunch that you meant RSRQ!   I know exactly what is happening here. Somewhere along the way, I learned that TD-LTE bands (33-53) needed a TA correction of -19 applied, and I confirmed it on several devices. Perhaps that is no longer universally true.. but what you're seeing SCP display matches that correction. Below 19 you see nothing, at 19 you see 0, and above that you see TA-19. The upper limit is 1282, which is why you see 1263. Your phone must report 1282 when the TA is unknown, which is not technically safe but I can work around that. Funny enough, I had a change to TA coming in the next update that had nothing to do with your issues.. TA:0 will be hidden moving forward, since several devices report 0 when it cannot be identified. I'll have an app update out shortly that addresses all of this, let me know how it works for you and thanks for the detailed feedback!
    • Mike, We ended up going out this morning to do errands in spite of the tropical storm.  I locked the phone on LTE B41, turned off the TA correction checkbox, and watched it carefully while out and about.  I have four screenshots for you. https://imgur.com/a/kCPTCnB First, I happened to get a screenshot of it doing the -44 dBm thing.  I also tried to send you at least one set of diagnostics showing the -44 dBm but I don't know where precisely in the process it collects the diagnostics.  Hopefully there's something useful in them. The rest of the screenshots are far more interesting.  All three were taken within seconds of each other in the CVS parking lot.  The phone's diagnostic screen shows a TA of 17, and oddly, the SCP diagnostics screenshot also appears to show a TA of 17.  But SCP's normal display is showing 0.  Not entirely sure what to make of that.  It looks like SCP won't show me a value other than 0 until I hit about 19 according to the phone diagnostic screen. It also appears that when SCP is showing a TA of 1263, that's the equivalent of a null value for the TA--no TA is calculated.  The phone diagnostic screen appears to show just "12" when that's happening; the SCP diagnostic screen shows 1282 in the TA section when that happens, a difference of 19, which is highly convenient given what I noted above about the TA value.  (I can't test that the phone diagnostic screen is limited to two characters and is thus truncating 1282 to just "12" as I suspect given where I am right now.  Had I known to be looking for it, I'd have tested in the middle of nowhere yesterday.) Anything catch your eye?  Anything I can do to help more?  - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...