Jump to content

iPhone: Necessary evil for carriers?


legion125

Recommended Posts

Interesting article on how the iPhone sucks the life out of carrier margins and bottom lines. Do any of you think the iPhone is worth it.

 

http://www.bgr.com/2012/02/08/carriers-hate-the-iphone/

 

Carriers hate the iPhone

 

Apple’s iPhone is the most profitable product offered by the most valuable company in the world. With only three iPhone models in its lineup, the Cupertino-based technology giant shipped more smartphones last quarter than any other vendor in the world. Carriers that sell Apple’s sought-after smartphone enjoy huge activation figures each quarter as a result, but activations and unit sales don’t necessarily paint a complete picture. In fact, according to some industry watchers, carriers hate the iPhone. Read on for more.

Wireless carriers trip over themselves to offer Apple’s iPhone, especially in the United States. Sprint wanted the handset so badly it was willing to guarantee Apple $15.5 billion over four years for the privilege of selling its sleek smartphone, and it certainly didn’t help matters much in the fourth quarter when Sprint posted a $1.3 billion loss. T-Mobile is still sour over failed negotiations with Apple, and the carrier has resorted to offering up free microSIM cards to iPhone users willing to come aboard and forgo 3G data speeds.

“A logical conclusion is that the iPhone is not good for wireless carriers,” Nomura Securities analyst Mike McCormack told CNNMoney. “When we look at the direct and indirect economics that Apple has managed to extract from the carriers, the carrier-level value destruction is quite evident.” The site notes that Verizon Wireless’s EBITDA service margin has dropped from an average of 46.4% per quarter to 42.2% since the carrier added the iPhone to its lineup one year ago.

But the iPhone is a necessary evil for carriers that some expect to pay off in the long run. Sprint on Wednesday reported its best quarter in more than six years for net subscriber additions thanks to the 720,000 new postpaid subscribers who came to the carrier for the iPhone. Some analysts also believe carriers will eventually raise their price points on the iPhone; despite the handset’s high cost to Apple’s partners, the iPhone 4S currently starts at $199 on contract to the end user while the iPhone 4 is available for $99 and the iPhone 3GS is free on contract from AT&T.

Regardless of what the iPhone is doing to carriers’ bottom lines, it remains the best-selling smartphone in the world and it likely will for some time. Apple is expected to launch a completely redesigned iPhone later this year that will reportedly feature a unibody aluminum case, a 4-inch display and 4G LTE connectivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the iPhone is definitely a double edged sword. It's apparent that Dan Hesse is aware of that too based on the flavor of the conference call today. But he sure played up the positive part of their relationship with Apple. He makes it sound symbiotic.

 

But we all know Apple is the real winner here. But hopefully, Sprint can find some way to win somewhat out of the deal. If they do, it's more in public perception and marketing, not in the financials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I wonder if the the predictions of Sprint showing a profit from iPhone sales will actually materialize in 2015. I'm guessing it's when the contract with Apple is pretty much over. If that's the case, then the revenue will have to come from the plans sold. This would be a small margin if you include the subsidized cost of the phone itself. I'm I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a good percentage of iPhone users that don't upgrade every time a new model is available or even every time they're eligible

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

That's true about iPhone users. I knew someone who still had an original iPhone on at&t until last year when they finally got rid of it and got an iPhone 4 on Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder where the crowds will come from for the iPhone 5? The 4s was such a crowd pleaser and so many were sold on contract that unless this next version is a "nuke" (Stealing a term from Hesse), I don't know what the numbers will be and will Sprint makes its quota. They still hace to sell a heck of a lot of phones for the next 4 years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way they could get the sales numbers they need is to adopt at&t's iPhone strategy; offer iPhone users annual upgrades. That worked very well for at&t for the iPhone 3G, 3Gs & the 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only way they could get the sales numbers they need is to adopt at&t's iPhone strategy; offer iPhone users annual upgrades. That worked very well for at&t for the iPhone 3G, 3Gs & the 4.
And watch their loss margin widen with the massive amount they subsidize the iPhone? They need to improve their network and continue to offer unlimited data. If the iPhone 5 supports sprint's lte they will sell a lot of iPhones for upgrades and bring in a lot of new customers. That is, if network vision pans out. The loss of light squared will hurt them some, but they should be fine

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
    • T-Mobile and EQT Announce Joint Venture to Acquire Lumos and Build Out the Un-carrier’s First Fiber Footprint https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-eqt-jv-to-acquire-lumos
    • Unable to confirm if it's really off but I noticed this morning that I'm no longer connecting to Band 41 on my home site. Switching my phone to LTE-only pretty much always put me on Band 41 since it was the least used band on T-Mobile's network. Now I'm only able to connect to Band 2/66. Not complaining because it means speeds are faster on LTE and maybe 150MHz n41 is around the corner.
    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...