Jump to content

Radio Comparison Article


Recommended Posts

Hasn't Sprints data service always been called "Vision" of some iteration?

 

Prior to PCS Vision, Sprint's cdmaOne circuit switched data service was called Wireless Web. Circa 2000-2001, when VZW was still getting its act together following the merger that formed it and Sprint was the only carrier to offer seamless wireless data service in all major markets, Wireless Web was kick ass.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I joined because I wanted to say thank you for this comparison in advance' date=' it's about time this happened![/quote']

 

I'm just waiting on the Epic to arrive. Should show up in the mail tomorrow.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Whoa, man, wow. That's so intense."

 

I feel quite certain that guy in the video could tell you where you could get some weed.

 

AJ

 

LOL. not jut any kind of weed but the top shelf, won't sell to anyone else, super good weed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert - can you comment on battery life of all the phones you're testing? No need to get into detailed tests for each phone, but just general impressions as to how the phones compare to one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert - can you comment on battery life of all the phones you're testing? No need to get into detailed tests for each phone' date=' but just general impressions as to how the phones compare to one another.[/quote']

 

EVO LTE = Great

Galaxy S III = Very Good

Galaxy Nexus = Good

LG Viper = Good

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any initial results yet? I'm not sure if I missed them or if you are trying to find time for this experiment. I'm sure juggling all those phones must be a daunting task!

 

I have one more batch of testing to do. Each batch takes a lot longer than I imagined before setting out. I hope to complete the work some time this week.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one more batch of testing to do. Each batch takes a lot longer than I imagined before setting out. I hope to complete the work some time this week.

 

Robert

 

Are you going to be able to include any LTE tests? (Thought maybe you made a secret detour on your vacation.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you going to be able to include any LTE tests? (Thought maybe you made a secret detour on your vacation.)

 

No. I'm going to release an article on the 1x/EVDO on 850 and 1900. I will be in Waco on Labor Day weekend, and I will test the 4 LTE devices I have there then in a separate article.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I'm going to release an article on the 1x/EVDO on 850 and 1900. I will be in Waco on Labor Day weekend, and I will test the 4 LTE devices I have there then in a separate article.

 

Robert

 

What are you going to be doing in Waco on Labor Day Weekend other than testing LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you going to be doing in Waco on Labor Day Weekend other than testing LTE?

 

I am there for a family function. My LTE testing is incidental, not the purpose.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I am there for a family function. My LTE testing is incidental' date=' not the purpose.

 

Robert[/quote']

 

Family function? Hopefully your family isn't as dysfunctional as mine is, lol.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleaned up the apk list on my EVO today and trimmed stuff down I will never use. Blocked a few permissions on apps that were causing some minor wake locks. Used better battery stats to identify them. And wow! Normal usage today and after 10 hours off the charger and I had 80 percent battery left. Awesome!

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleaned up the apk list on my EVO today and trimmed stuff down I will never use. Blocked a few permissions on apps that were causing some minor wake locks. Used better battery stats to identify them. And wow! Normal usage today and after 10 hours off the charger and I had 80 percent battery left. Awesome!

 

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

What rom are you using? I'm using Viper4g and it's awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What rom are you using? I'm using Viper4g and it's awesome.

 

Tried viper way back. Went to meanrom. I have a script that cleans and mods a few things though.

 

One day I will just make my own since I can't find one that has everything set like I want. Like for one, if the app is available on the market, YouTube, facebook, etc it should not be on the Rom. Get it from the market if you want it.

 

Digging into things and trying to get rid of the ugly white on the settings screens and email screens. Maybe then I will put something together.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new Viper that was released last week is very good. Not sure if that's the one your tried or not.

 

I might check it out, it had a bit of fluff to it though. Will have to see what I can clean up before flashing.

 

TWRP and titanium backup make it so easy to setup a new blank Rom and then flip back and forth between them on the go.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this test going to be better than using what the FCC report shows #s wise?....I guess showing the lte signal versus evdo and how that looks to an extent but I'd think the FCC #s would suffice for telling which phone had better signal than others generally....

 

Just trying to understand the overall purpose here as I don't see the need for comparing signals across phones since that's been done with high tech equipment at the FCC already...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sgt., the FCC is not concerned with RF reception. The labs that are certified to submit test results to the FCC assess only RF transmission.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sgt., the FCC is not concerned with RF reception. The labs that are certified to submit test results to the FCC assess only RF transmission.

 

AJ

 

Ahhh

 

Okay so we end up making a lot of assumptions on things when trying to deduce the phones signal reception ability when we only base it off the FCC figures....(obviously ignoring the radio software as we all know this can vary drastically bw OEMs.)....that is if we are looking at this from a hardware perspective mainly...

 

On the same page now though... :)

 

What will be used to judge the signal? Going to go off the internal menus?...if so are the values there not effected somewhat by how the software calculates them or are the flat numbers/values/calculations used across all OEMs?...

Like how we know you can tweak it to show more/less bars depending on the signal # given....I dont know how the device is determining those internal numbers, hence the question.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another to throw in the mix of thoughts... Two receivers side by side are receiving the same signal strength, but one is more "efficient" and shows a higher signal quality. The same can also be said on the send side. One radio might be more powerful on the signal power but it's not a high quality signal like another lower powered phone. One of the reasons you see loopback tests on many two way devices.

 

To really compare the phones on just debug screens alone you would also need the stats the tower has on receiving the signal from the phone.

 

I'm very interested to see the test article when it comes out.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...