Jump to content

Radio Comparison Article


Recommended Posts

Hasn't Sprints data service always been called "Vision" of some iteration?

 

Prior to PCS Vision, Sprint's cdmaOne circuit switched data service was called Wireless Web. Circa 2000-2001, when VZW was still getting its act together following the merger that formed it and Sprint was the only carrier to offer seamless wireless data service in all major markets, Wireless Web was kick ass.

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I joined because I wanted to say thank you for this comparison in advance' date=' it's about time this happened![/quote']

 

I'm just waiting on the Epic to arrive. Should show up in the mail tomorrow.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Whoa, man, wow. That's so intense."

 

I feel quite certain that guy in the video could tell you where you could get some weed.

 

AJ

 

LOL. not jut any kind of weed but the top shelf, won't sell to anyone else, super good weed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert - can you comment on battery life of all the phones you're testing? No need to get into detailed tests for each phone, but just general impressions as to how the phones compare to one another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert - can you comment on battery life of all the phones you're testing? No need to get into detailed tests for each phone' date=' but just general impressions as to how the phones compare to one another.[/quote']

 

EVO LTE = Great

Galaxy S III = Very Good

Galaxy Nexus = Good

LG Viper = Good

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Any initial results yet? I'm not sure if I missed them or if you are trying to find time for this experiment. I'm sure juggling all those phones must be a daunting task!

 

I have one more batch of testing to do. Each batch takes a lot longer than I imagined before setting out. I hope to complete the work some time this week.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have one more batch of testing to do. Each batch takes a lot longer than I imagined before setting out. I hope to complete the work some time this week.

 

Robert

 

Are you going to be able to include any LTE tests? (Thought maybe you made a secret detour on your vacation.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you going to be able to include any LTE tests? (Thought maybe you made a secret detour on your vacation.)

 

No. I'm going to release an article on the 1x/EVDO on 850 and 1900. I will be in Waco on Labor Day weekend, and I will test the 4 LTE devices I have there then in a separate article.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I'm going to release an article on the 1x/EVDO on 850 and 1900. I will be in Waco on Labor Day weekend, and I will test the 4 LTE devices I have there then in a separate article.

 

Robert

 

What are you going to be doing in Waco on Labor Day Weekend other than testing LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you going to be doing in Waco on Labor Day Weekend other than testing LTE?

 

I am there for a family function. My LTE testing is incidental, not the purpose.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I am there for a family function. My LTE testing is incidental' date=' not the purpose.

 

Robert[/quote']

 

Family function? Hopefully your family isn't as dysfunctional as mine is, lol.

 

Sent from my LG Viper 4G LTE using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleaned up the apk list on my EVO today and trimmed stuff down I will never use. Blocked a few permissions on apps that were causing some minor wake locks. Used better battery stats to identify them. And wow! Normal usage today and after 10 hours off the charger and I had 80 percent battery left. Awesome!

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cleaned up the apk list on my EVO today and trimmed stuff down I will never use. Blocked a few permissions on apps that were causing some minor wake locks. Used better battery stats to identify them. And wow! Normal usage today and after 10 hours off the charger and I had 80 percent battery left. Awesome!

 

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

What rom are you using? I'm using Viper4g and it's awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What rom are you using? I'm using Viper4g and it's awesome.

 

Tried viper way back. Went to meanrom. I have a script that cleans and mods a few things though.

 

One day I will just make my own since I can't find one that has everything set like I want. Like for one, if the app is available on the market, YouTube, facebook, etc it should not be on the Rom. Get it from the market if you want it.

 

Digging into things and trying to get rid of the ugly white on the settings screens and email screens. Maybe then I will put something together.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new Viper that was released last week is very good. Not sure if that's the one your tried or not.

 

I might check it out, it had a bit of fluff to it though. Will have to see what I can clean up before flashing.

 

TWRP and titanium backup make it so easy to setup a new blank Rom and then flip back and forth between them on the go.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this test going to be better than using what the FCC report shows #s wise?....I guess showing the lte signal versus evdo and how that looks to an extent but I'd think the FCC #s would suffice for telling which phone had better signal than others generally....

 

Just trying to understand the overall purpose here as I don't see the need for comparing signals across phones since that's been done with high tech equipment at the FCC already...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sgt., the FCC is not concerned with RF reception. The labs that are certified to submit test results to the FCC assess only RF transmission.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sgt., the FCC is not concerned with RF reception. The labs that are certified to submit test results to the FCC assess only RF transmission.

 

AJ

 

Ahhh

 

Okay so we end up making a lot of assumptions on things when trying to deduce the phones signal reception ability when we only base it off the FCC figures....(obviously ignoring the radio software as we all know this can vary drastically bw OEMs.)....that is if we are looking at this from a hardware perspective mainly...

 

On the same page now though... :)

 

What will be used to judge the signal? Going to go off the internal menus?...if so are the values there not effected somewhat by how the software calculates them or are the flat numbers/values/calculations used across all OEMs?...

Like how we know you can tweak it to show more/less bars depending on the signal # given....I dont know how the device is determining those internal numbers, hence the question.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's another to throw in the mix of thoughts... Two receivers side by side are receiving the same signal strength, but one is more "efficient" and shows a higher signal quality. The same can also be said on the send side. One radio might be more powerful on the signal power but it's not a high quality signal like another lower powered phone. One of the reasons you see loopback tests on many two way devices.

 

To really compare the phones on just debug screens alone you would also need the stats the tower has on receiving the signal from the phone.

 

I'm very interested to see the test article when it comes out.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...