Jump to content

Radio Comparison Article


Recommended Posts

OK. We now have a Motorola Photon on the way after a member donated his device to the experiment. So now we have a total of eight devices that will be a part of the 1x/EVDO radio performance article we are working on.

 

1. Samsung Galaxy S-III

2. HTC EVO LTE

3. LG Viper LTE

4. Galaxy Nexus

5. Samsung Galaxy S-II Epic 4G Touch

6. Motorola Photon

7. HTC EVO 3D

8. HTC EVO 4G

9. Samsung Epic 4G

 

I will be doing the testing later this week. I'm also going to go to a lightly used WiMax Protection Site for testing the four WiMax devices in a separate article. Additionally, I'm considering a trip to DFW for a LTE reception article later in the month after the network stops being blocked.

 

I'm looking forward to it. It's going to be a lot of work, but it will be interesting to have these results. Tests will be conducted at full signal locations near the tower, mid range locations and edge of cell locations with tests being held and laying flat without being touched.

 

Stay tuned.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Edited by S4GRU
Samsung Epic 4G added to the list
  • Like 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds great. Recording average RSSI, Ec/Io reported on each handset at the each location would be nice also.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert may have to adopt Buddhism in order to manage all of these handset RF tests.

 

pop2-2.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

u may want to test it while holding it since most people use their phone like that but thats just my opinion.

 

I am testing both, because I would like to identify which devices are more susceptible to being held.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

u may want to test it while holding it since most people use their phone like that but thats just my opinion.

I am testing both, because I would like to identify which devices are more susceptible to bring held.

 

The device with the highest signal level while being held wins the Fleetwood Mac award.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzwO4iW3P0Q

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...or should it be the 38 Special award?

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I'm old compared to you whippersnappers, but I really like Fleetwood Mac. At least you didn't pick Tusk.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...or should it be the 38 Special award?

 

 

AJ

 

How many people are in that band? I saw 2 drummers and 4 guitarists. No wonder they can't afford to cut their hair...

 

Sent from my Jelly Bean Toro using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to get reasonably valid results, I recommend a strict testing protocol:

  • all handsets be set to a single mode (e.g. 1X only or EV-DO only)
  • all handsets be set to the same sampling interval (preferably 5 sec)
  • all handsets be confirmed on the same RF channel and PN offset
  • all readings be taken over a significantly long period (probably 2 min) and averaged

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to get reasonably valid results, I recommend a strict testing protocol:

[*]all handsets be set to a single mode (e.g. 1X only or EV-DO only)

 

 

But I thought I saw reports that the newer devices have better 3g performance with LTE turned on, due to the new herp-derp system. That ought to count for something, no?

 

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Edited by djw39
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I thought I saw reports that the newer devices have better 3g performance with LTE turned on, due to the new herp-derp system. That ought to count for something, no?

 

Nope. eHRPD is a core network enhancement. It has no effect on the airlink, which remains EV-DO Rev A.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being on eHRDP could affect speeds though if traffic is going to a different packet core no? As long as all the phones are tested over eHRDP it should still enable an apples to apples comparison to be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being on eHRDP could affect speeds though if traffic is going to a different packet core no? As long as all the phones are tested over eHRDP it should still enable an apples to apples comparison to be made.

Yeah that sounds right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being on eHRDP could affect speeds though if traffic is going to a different packet core no? As long as all the phones are tested over eHRDP it should still enable an apples to apples comparison to be made.

Yeah that sounds right.

 

Guys, these are to be raw RF tests, not speed tests. Many of the handsets likely will not even be activated.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of this article is to compare radio performance from the standpoint of signal strength, not so much speeds. I will do speed tests to compare if there is any correlation between decreased signal and speeds, not to try determine if one device is faster than another.

 

eHRPD is totally irrelevant to this exercise.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You go playing with all those handsets, and you're likely to catch the eHRPD... be careful

 

I do not know what happened, but my eHERPIES disappeared for about two days. So, I made the most of it and went around having lots of phone sex. The eHERPIES are back now, though.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not know what happened, but my eHERPIES disappeared for about two days. So, I made the most of it and went around having lots of phone sex. The eHERPIES are back now, though.

 

AJ

I think you can buy a creme for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being on eHRDP could affect speeds though if traffic is going to a different packet core no? As long as all the phones are tested over eHRDP it should still enable an apples to apples comparison to be made.

 

if you want apples to apples we need an iPhone in a line up too. To be fair all of us been drinking different flavors of Android Kool Aid, what about some apple juice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Another SCP beta is rolling out now, with some bugfixes as usual but also some fun new options to test: Non-standalone 5G-NR cells can now display Site Notes. This feature works in the same manner as how neighbor cell notes are displayed, requiring a PCI and your device's location. This option is enabled by default. As is the case with neighbor cell notes, you cannot edit NSA site notes directly unless there is an NCI being reported (which I have never seen); it uses the previously recorded standalone log entries. Like neighbor notes, if a cell has been previously logged but there is no note, you will see the distance information only.   Logging cells that are not reporting a valid PLMN is now possible. This option is disabled by default, but if you enable it along with two other options (log sites with missing GCI/NCI and to log sites with missing TAC), you should begin logging most NSA 5G-NR cells. A PCI is needed at a minimum, which is not always reported depending on your device and network factors. ("Sites" will be renamed to "cells" on the Preferences menu in the next update.)   Users can enable an option to display LTE cells above 5G-NR cells in the app if they choose to do so. This option is disabled by default. Should help improve the readability of your screen if you have NSA 5G-NR cells constantly appearing/disappearing. Please give these options a try and let me know if you notice any issues.. thanks!
    • Not yet. We probably won't see one submitted until construction on the new building is substantially complete. 
    • Yes, that is where the site used to be. All the antennas were removed. I hope they add a new site soon. Have any permits been submitted for a new site?
    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
    • Yep, you can see the site was taken down between Aug 2022 and Apr 2023.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...