Jump to content

Report Your LTE Connection Here


Recommended Posts

In general, is there any way to translate the Network ID (NID) and Base Station ID (BID) values reported by netmonitor, which also seem to be the standard on-phone values detected by the Android utility Android System Info, to the site numbers reported in your maps? Is there a table somewhere that can cross-reference these?

 

Pretty sure that the BID is used in the FCC database for tower location, however the database is out of date, incomplete, and unsearchable to the point of being not useable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure that the BID is used in the FCC database for tower location, however the database is out of date, incomplete, and unsearchable to the point of being not useable.

 

I doubt that. PCS 1900 MHz licensees are not required to register individual sites. Yes, licensees (or tower owners) do have to register towers that exceed certain standards. But not all sites are located on towers, let alone towers that require registration.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rookie request here - I am looking at my nearby towers and was wondering if someone could provide pictures (or a description) on what a LTE ready tower looks like and what pre-LTE towers look like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8mbps in merrillville' date=' indiana[/quote']

 

Do you know the tower id?

 

Sent from my CM9 Epic 4g Touch using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8mbps in merrillville, indiana

 

Could you please take a screenshot of netmoniter while connected on LTE? This helps me find the tower so that a coverage map can be made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that. PCS 1900 MHz licensees are not required to register individual sites. Yes, licensees (or tower owners) do have to register towers that exceed certain standards. But not all sites are located on towers, let alone towers that require registration.

 

AJ

 

Guess that would be why I had so much trouble finding many of the sites on the maps in the fcc database :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Could you please take a screenshot of netmoniter while connected on LTE? This helps me find the tower so that a coverage map can be made.

 

I'll have to get back to you on that. The speed test was done on my cousins evo lte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HO03XC328, Reported by Latinoboi30, allowing connections

 

 

 

 

THis tower was being blocked yesterday at3:00 PM when I went through the area. I have not found a single active 4GLTE signal in North Houston recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THis tower was being blocked yesterday at3:00 PM when I went through the area. I have not found a single active 4GLTE signal in North Houston recently.

 

:td: Thank you it has been updated

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is probably laughing at us. We are giving them all the information they need to block LTE sites that are left open, right down to their Site ID numbers.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is probably laughing at us. We are giving them all the information they need to block LTE sites that are left open, right down to their Site ID numbers. Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

:wall:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is probably laughing at us. We are giving them all the information they need to block LTE sites that are left open, right down to their Site ID numbers.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

I was thinking sites appear to be open during the first 24-48 hours after going online for testing then are blocked?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was thinking sites appear to be open during the first 24-48 hours after going online for testing then are blocked?

 

This seems to be the case. I think it's the period from when the OEM completes the site and has it online and when Sprint confirms that the site meets contract requirements and accepts the site. I think the first thing Sprint does when it takes over the site is block the LTE.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to be the case. I think it's the period from when the OEM completes the site and has it online and when Sprint confirms that the site meets contract requirements and accepts the site. I think the first thing Sprint does when it takes over the site is block the LTE.

 

Robert

 

If this is the case.....Chicago is going to suuuuuuck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is the case.....Chicago is going to suuuuuuck.

 

I don't think blocking is going to continue much longer. Since Sprint invited PCMag out to one of their sites to experience LTE, I imagine that's a sign that they are going to open it up soon. :fingers:

 

Robert

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I don't think blocking is going to continue much longer. Since Sprint invited PCMag out to one of their sites to experience LTE' date=' I imagine that's a sign that they are going to open it up soon. :fingers:

 

Robert[/quote']

 

And LTE showing up on the public Sprint.com coverage maps

 

Sent from my CM9 Epic 4g Touch using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And LTE showing up on the public Sprint.com coverage maps

 

Sent from my CM9 Epic 4g Touch using Forum Runner

 

Where?

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Qbking77 reports LTE in Elgin, IL

 

I have heard a few reports of this I don't have enough information to figure out what tower they are connecting to though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Qbking77 reports LTE in Elgin, IL

 

Very interesting to see some actual live LTE in the Chicagoland area beyond NW Indiana. Everyone keep their Evos ready and their eyes peeled.

Damn that QBking can talk, that video could have been a third the size with the same info. Yeesh.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...