tt0h Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Latest LTE Update: On Hold http://insidesprintn...cements-update/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickie546 Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Latest LTE Update: On Hold http://insidesprintn...cements-update/ Well that is something to back up the info... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Latest LTE Update: On Hold http://insidesprintn...cements-update/ Turns out it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the message didnt go out yesterday, it only took a misinformed rumor mill website. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odell Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 That's not really fair. The guy is only posting what the internal communications are showing. He can't control if the corp follows through on them or not. Folks just need to take what's reported as unofficial until you hear it from Sprint directly. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalex7777 Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Can you repost the article... that linky no worky Don't know why, that URL is totally wrong. The article is on reception issues on the E4GLE. Here is the correct link: http://www.techhive.com/article/2000138/htc-evo-4g-lte-signal-woes-confirmed.html That one should work. This is now the leading article on the "HTC EVO 4G LTE" topic on Google News... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Don't know why, that URL is totally wrong. The article is on reception issues on the E4GLE. Here is the correct link: http://www.techhive....-confirmed.html That one should work. This is now the leading article on the "HTC EVO 4G LTE" topic on Google News... I have a couple of big issues with this article. They are so bad, that it throws everything they did into question. Here is Quote #1: Another reason might be due to the fact that Sprint seems to be no longer updating and maintaining its 3G network. In PCWorld’s 3G and 4G Wireless Speed Showdown, our testers found that Sprint was consistently behind in our tests. According to author Mark Sullivan, the carrier seems to have stopped developing its existing 3G and 4G (WiMax) networks while transitioning from its outdated WiMax 4G technology to LTE. Are they serious? Sprint is spending a billion dollars on 3G enhancements ahead of Network Vision. That's what network.sprint.com tracks. Also, Network Vision has billions of dollars in 3G enhancements, including DO Advanced. They should have called me for a quote. It's true they abandoned WiMax, but not 3G. This is journalistic malfeasance. Here is Quote #2: In the PCWorld review of the HTC EVO 4G LTE, we criticized the phone’s slow speeds over 3G. In New Orleans, the HTC Evo achieved an average of 1.4 Mbps for download speeds and 0.52 Mbps for upload speeds. In San Francisco, Sprint's 3G network was a bit faster, with an average speed of 1.69 Mbps for downloads and 0.90 Mbps for uploads. What? They criticize Sprint's slow 3G speeds with 1.4Mbps and 1.69Mbps download speeds? What? Those are great 3G speeds. And those are screaming 3G speeds compared to most urban/suburban locations on the Sprint network. If we all could get that, none of us would be complaining. Those are even good speeds on VZW 3G. It's obvious that if they post things like this, they put no value in trying to investigate the issues they are reporting about the EVO LTE. No credibility in my book. The way they "scientifically" tested the devices is so poor, that they should not have written an article about it. Did they verify if the EVO LTE was changing towers? That would be the most likely reason for changes in signal strength, not antenna issues. Although I wouldn't rule out issues with the new EVO, but there is no way I would conclude there is based on this piss poor article. Sorry to rant, but I have major heartburn with the piece. :rant: Robert 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalex7777 Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Robert, These are exactly the kind of issues that after a long week, I did not want to get into at the end of Thursday. However, they do show how ignorant these folks were, and how dangerous a simplistic app like Open Signal Maps. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Robert, These are exactly the kind of issues that after a long week, I did not want to get into at the end of Thursday. However, they do show how ignorant these folks were, and how dangerous a simplistic app like Open Signal Maps. Thank you for posting the link. Sometimes it's good to get the blood moving first thing in the morning. I like to know what others are saying, even if inaccurate. Robert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 a little off topic too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kendog Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 LTE in Puerto Rico? http://www.tecnetico.com/34085/cuantas-veces-tendria-que-escribir-rumor-en-este-titular-sobre-lte-de-sprint-en-puerto-rico-para-que-te-convenzas-que-es-un-rumor/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Que¿ those look suspiciously like my screenshots Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Also this is off topic.. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 LTE in Puerto Rico? http://www.tecnetico...ue-es-un-rumor/ I responded to the Tecnetico article: Sprint is definitely under way with Network Vision in Puerto Rico. But I do not believe they are anywhere near ready to actually have 4G LTE live anywhere there yet. It is my understanding that the 4G Core in Bayamon will not be ready until the end of summer. So Network Vision will continue to be deployed, but the 4G cannot be live until then at the earliest. Additionally, Sprint LTE devices only show "4G" icon in the signal indicator, and do not show LTE. Just like WiMax. These speed tests could not be WiMax, because they are much higher speeds than WiMax can support. These speed test screen shots are most likely Sprint LTE stateside, and not conducted in PR...in my opinion. Thank you, Wilton. Gracias! Robert, S4GRU.com 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proxcee Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Hind sight is always 20/20...but it really was foolish to get your hopes up. Even if sprint did send out this mysterious text message...who's to say it wouldn't restate the obvious "LTE COMING IN MID 2012!" or something like that? Although I'm still waiting it out before buying a phone...I was hoping for the best on 6/7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyer8493 Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 I have a couple of big issues with this article. They are so bad, that it throws everything they did into question. Here is Quote #1: Are they serious? Sprint is spending a billion dollars on 3G enhancements ahead of Network Vision. That's what network.sprint.com tracks. Also, Network Vision has billions of dollars in 3G enhancements, including DO Advanced. They should have called me for a quote. It's true they abandoned WiMax, but not 3G. This is journalistic malfeasance. Here is Quote #2: What? They criticize Sprint's slow 3G speeds with 1.4Mbps and 1.69Mbps download speeds? What? Those are great 3G speeds. And those are screaming 3G speeds compared to most urban/suburban locations on the Sprint network. If we all could get that, none of us would be complaining. Those are even good speeds on VZW 3G. It's obvious that if they post things like this, they put no value in trying to investigate the issues they are reporting about the EVO LTE. No credibility in my book. The way they "scientifically" tested the devices is so poor, that they should not have written an article about it. Did they verify if the EVO LTE was changing towers? That would be the most likely reason for changes in signal strength, not antenna issues. Although I wouldn't rule out issues with the new EVO, but there is no way I would conclude there is based on this piss poor article. Sorry to rant, but I have major heartburn with the piece. Robert Yeah that is a piss poor article I agree. And correct me if I am wrong but the evo lte being a brand new phone, it is going to take time to properly provision it with the network. It may even take a radio update or two before Sprint nails it on the head. Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnHovah Posted June 8, 2012 Share Posted June 8, 2012 Hind sight is always 20/20...but it really was foolish to get your hopes up. Even if sprint did send out this mysterious text message...who's to say it wouldn't restate the obvious "LTE COMING IN MID 2012!" or something like that? Although I'm still waiting it out before buying a phone...I was hoping for the best on 6/7. Maybe on the 21st with the SGS3 release?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VW Maverick Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Maybe on the 21st with the SGS3 release?? I hear that Apple is trying to pull another EVO and are trying to stop the SGS3 imports/sale. Mav. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Nexus 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 LTE in Puerto Rico? http://www.tecnetico...ue-es-un-rumor/ these sons of bitches stole my screenshots of my speed tests first seen at: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/844-athens-ga-lte/page__view__findpost__p__15158 and then put their crappy watermark on them... wtf? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 dont know how you guys missed that! but i responded. LTE nazi strikes again. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digiblur Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I got a good chuckle out of what they said the PRL does. Close but no cigar. It's a list of cellular systems. A prl update isn't going to give you better signal unless of course they release one with the 800SMR band preferred first which isn't going to happen from what I saw when they had the Chicago area One in there. Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 thats not true, you have several bands to choose from.... 1900mhz, 1900mhz, and 1900mhz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenChase7 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 thats not true, you have several bands to choose from.... 1900mhz, 1900mhz, and 1900mhz I dont see your comments on there any more.. Were they "moderated?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 they are still on there. located on http://www.tecnetico.com/34085/cuantas-veces-tendria-que-escribir-rumor-en-este-titular-sobre-lte-de-sprint-en-puerto-rico-para-que-te-convenzas-que-es-un-rumor/#comment-33080 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 i dont care if s4gru watermarked my photos... as i am one for the team here... but dont enjoy seeing them spread all over the world with other websites markings on them :\ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenChase7 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 they are still on there. located on http://www.tecnetico.../#comment-33080 Humm, when I click that link, I see S4GRU's, but not yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.