Jump to content
Rickie546

Network Vision/LTE - Kansas Market (including KC, Topeka, Wichita, St. Joseph)

Recommended Posts

The problem is at my home, 106th and Quivira behind the hospital. This screen shot is as fast network speed I get. Glance

That's what you can expect on an active site connected to B25/B26..

Only exception is a B41 site

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is at my home, 106th and Quivira behind the hospital. This screen shot is as fast network speed I get. Glance

If you think Sprint's the problem.. Here's my UDP Verizon MiFI

 

4747016498.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is at my home, 106th and Quivira behind the hospital. This screen shot is as fast network speed I get. Glance

 

As David indicated, those speeds are in the average range for a 5 MHz FDD carrier.  They are perfectly usable.  But why are you concerned about LTE speeds at home?  You should be on Wi-Fi via your wired broadband.  And you are posting from an Everest IP address, so you do have wired broadband.  People unnecessarily running speed tests and using LTE in places (home, work, school) where they may have secure, fast Wi-Fi are contributing reasons why mobile data speeds slow down.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concordia ks no longer has native coverage (just drove through)

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea if they are reasonable for LTE, my main point was, on average, friends and workers were getting 12, 15, 18 download from home and various spots in the metro and I was averaging 2 to 3, which is a big difference. Yes, I use WiFi at home, it would be foolish and a network hog to use carrier data if I don't have to. Maybe speeds will get even faster with the newest new network LTE Plus. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea if they are reasonable for LTE, my main point was, on average, friends and workers were getting 12, 15, 18 download from home and various spots in the metro and I was averaging 2 to 3, which is a big difference. Yes, I use WiFi at home, it would be foolish and a network hog to use carrier data if I don't have to. Maybe speeds will get even faster with the newest new network LTE Plus. 

 

What phone are you using? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea if they are reasonable for LTE, my main point was, on average, friends and workers were getting 12, 15, 18 download from home and various spots in the metro and I was averaging 2 to 3, which is a big difference. Yes, I use WiFi at home, it would be foolish and a network hog to use carrier data if I don't have to. Maybe speeds will get even faster with the newest new network LTE Plus. 

What phone are you using? 

 

Yes, what handset are you using?  If it is still the HTC EVO 4G LTE listed under your phones/devices, then you are getting the expected average LTE speeds.  You have access to only one 5 MHz FDD band 25 carrier.  Others with more recent handsets have access to one 5 MHz FDD band 25 carrier, one 5 MHz FDD band 26 carrier, and two 20 MHz TDD band 41 carriers.  That makes a huge difference.

 

Additionally, your friends and coworkers could be using VZW, AT&T, or T-Mobile -- all of which have lower market share than Sprint in the Kansas City metro, all of which have different LTE bandwidth configurations, but all of which are greater than 5 MHz FDD.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Concordia ks no longer has native coverage (just drove through)

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

when i went back through there, i was finally able to connect to 1x 800 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somehow, I missed this in the Sprint press release:

 

As for public venues, in the past six months we upgraded the outdoor distributed antenna system in Lawrence, and we optimized our wireless systems in and around Kaufman Stadium (where RCR Wireless reports our network “reigns supreme”), Arrowhead Stadium, Sporting Park, and Sprint Center for even better coverage and data speeds.

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/blogs/sprint-perspectives/sprint-improves-its-network-as-competition-heats-up-in-kansas-city.htm

 

I know basically everything about the macro network in Lawrence.  But an outdoor DAS?  I am at a loss.  I do not know where that is, and S4GRU has no record of it.

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somehow, I missed this in the Sprint press release:

 

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/blogs/sprint-perspectives/sprint-improves-its-network-as-competition-heats-up-in-kansas-city.htm

 

I know basically everything about the macro network in Lawrence.  But an outdoor DAS?  I am at a loss.  I do not know where that is, and S4GRU has no record of it.

 

AJ

Would they be talking about the ku campus area?? I know it isn't downtown, I was downtown Lawrence for thanksgiving and was on band 26 and it was weak band 26 for most of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somehow, I missed this in the Sprint press release:

 

 

http://newsroom.sprint.com/blogs/sprint-perspectives/sprint-improves-its-network-as-competition-heats-up-in-kansas-city.htm

 

I know basically everything about the macro network in Lawrence. But an outdoor DAS? I am at a loss. I do not know where that is, and S4GRU has no record of it.

 

AJ

I assumed they meant the stadium/arena. They sure were vague. Now you know your mission. Find it!

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed they meant the stadium/arena. They sure were vague. Now you know your mission. Find it!

 

Downtown would be a good idea.  The current macro site location at the southern edge of downtown is not ideal in this high speed data day and age.  It shoots longitudinally down Massachusetts St through a lot of 100-150 year old masonry/brick buildings.  In building coverage on the north side of downtown relies a lot on band 26.  But as for a downtown DAS, we have no evidence of it.

 

So, it could be Memorial Stadium.  AT&T has a temporary or even permanent COW there.

 

It could be the KU campus.  KU Information Technology has an extensive outdoor Wi-Fi antenna network -- that probably is broadband enough to host band 41, too.  But I think I would have noticed that.  Plus, Sprint already is the only operator with an on campus macro site.

 

Maybe it is Rock Chalk Park -- the relatively new KU athletics development on the far west side of town.  It is about halfway between the urban macro site at Free State HS and the rural macro site south of Lecompton.  A DAS there could make sense.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody getting slow speeds in kc metro Kansas side lately. I used to be able to get 120 down on CA sites. After moving to different areas with 2 different phones, getting 4 to 8 down and 10 up.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody getting slow speeds in kc metro Kansas side lately. I used to be able to get 120 down on CA sites. After moving to different areas with 2 different phones, getting 4 to 8 down and 10 up.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

I was on the Kansas side at Christmas and didn't notice anything unusual. Still getting between 50 and 100Mbps on most CA sites. Though, I was not running tests at every moment seeing as it was Christmas (and I don't run around doing speedtests anyway).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought i was getting throttled so i started checking.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought i was getting throttled so i started checking.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

 

Well, how much data do you use? If you're at 20+ GBs, it's quite possible you're seeing some network shaping. And if you're only checking when connected to one particular site, that could also explain it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@DkoellerwxSorry I haven't posted this sooner David.  I'm pretty sure this is my home tower; (South 7 Highway & Cowherd Road).  It's maybe 400 yards away.  If I'm connecting to another tower, I sure don't know where it is.

 

SCP screen.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, skid71 said:

@DkoellerwxSorry I haven't posted this sooner David.  I'm pretty sure this is my home tower; (South 7 Highway & Cowherd Road).  It's maybe 400 yards away.  If I'm connecting to another tower, I sure don't know where it is.

 

SCP screen.png

That is a site up to your north at Adam Dairy and Shamrock. I would expect to see a signal in the -90 - -80 dBm range if you were connecting to a B41 site 400 yards away. The site you are connecting to is also broadcasting 2xCA. However, since the signal is at the bottom end of the range, you probably won't see great speeds. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Dkoellerwx said:

That is a site up to your north at Adam Dairy and Shamrock. I would expect to see a signal in the -90 - -80 dBm range if you were connecting to a B41 site 400 yards away. The site you are connecting to is also broadcasting 2xCA. However, since the signal is at the bottom end of the range, you probably won't see great speeds. 

David,

You certainly are right, my home tower must not have B41.  B25 speeds on that tower are perfectly acceptable to me, if memory serves, it's usually between 8-20mbps.  It's pretty rare for our wifi to go out.  Anytime I'm out in the yard or neighborhood I'm able to stream/etc. without issue.  The different tower explains the low B41 signal strength.

Out of curiosity, would you expect the tower at 7 Highway & Cowherd to get B41 in the future?

Thanks as always for the knowledge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

B41 is now live in Collins, Lowry City and Clinton! Plus I found two new B41 deployments along I-49 and I-435 on the Missouri side (in Belton and KCMO respectively) that filled in previous weak gaps. These sites were B25/26 previously. I could not tell if they were Hexadecaport antennas or not, foggy and raining made it hard to see. 

I know the site at 87th and Lackman in Lenexa has new antennas on it. I could not get a good look. The site was previously B25/26 + Clear B41. Clear was still active so don't think they are finished. 

Sprint is really moving again, so keep your eyes peeled for new developments! Even in places you may not expect. I will be heading out I-70 tomorrow and expect to find some new B41. 

  • Like 5
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

B41 additions in Topeka, Junction City/Ft. Riley, and Abilene.

As a follow-up to the above post, crews still had ropes up on the 87th and Lackman site in Lenexa. The new antennas aren't fully installed yet, but I did see new RRUs.

Sent from my LG G6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By danlodish345
      Even though Sprint doesn't have the best coverage in my area. I do have lots of memories and nostalgia with the company. I wonder who else here will miss Sprint besides me?
    • By vanko987
      I'm new to this forum, and I've seen people mention cell sites with specific ID's (for example, SF33XC664). Is there any significance to these ID's, and is there a way to decode them? Also, how do I figure out what the cell site ID's are for towers near me?
      Thanks! I'm excited to start talking on this site more 😀
    • By lilotimz
      Samsung Network Vision equipment are highly distinct and fairly easy to spot compared to the equipment that other vendors are deploying. Sprint is Samsung's first extremely massive American contract (baring Clearwire) so there  should be no issues in confusing these equipment for another carrier which happens often with Ericsson NV equipment.

      Below are images of Samsung equipment which includes antennas, remote radio units, base stations, and their mounting configurations. 
       
      Samsung antenna with eSMR 800 RRU & PCS 1900 RRU

      A close look at a Samsung setup





      Next Generation Samsung Configuration
      RRH-P4 4T4R 1.9 GHz  | RRH-C4 4T4R 800 MHz| RRH-V3 2.5 GHz

      Next Generation 8 Port Dual Band Antenna Setup 
      4 port 800 MHz RRH-C4 800

      (source: dkyeager)

      (source: dkyeager)
      Narrow beam setup

      High Capacity Site with 2 Antennas & 3 RRUs (2x PCS & 1x SMR).
      Second antenna is PCS only for now.


      Canadian IBEZ (NO SMR)

      Special Case PCS Only Setup for Canadian IBEZ




      Close up of standard antenna connectors 

      Samsung Cabinets

       
       
      Powerpoint slides from Samsung / Sprint
      *disclaimer - all  powerpoint diagrams and images were found through public municipality online databases and is by no means misappropriated through malicious means*
      *Credit goes to those whom took pictures of these equipment. You know who you are*
    • By kckid
      Sprint announced at MWC trade show in Barcelona that 5G will go live with 4 cities starting in May  (Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas and Kansas City )
      https://phys.org/news/2019-02-sprint-5g-network-chicago-atlanta.html
       
  • Posts

    • There might be a u.fl connector inside for a GPS antenna, but I really don't know. There should be pictures on the FCCs website if you feel like digging. How many satellites does it see? Is there a large building outside the window where your magic box is? Anything significantly blocking the view of the horizon and sky? If so, is there a different spot you can move it? Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    • Is there any way to connect an external GPS antenna?  While my phone can get a good GPS lock, the MB Gold does not seem to be capable of doing so.  I don't mind taking this thing apart if it is possible.
    • Writing this from a few miles west of Fredericksburg, where my phone defaults to 5 MHz of B2 unless I flat-out block that band. No idea why, as B2 performance is can't-run-a-speedtest poor here. B66 is fine, with something like 15x15 spread over a few channels, though upload speeds are poor. NR is hit-or-miss (mostly miss); I'm not seeing more than ~-110 RSRP on B71 so that cell site is apparently nowhere near here. Thing is, since that spectrum is so quiet, I can still pull 20-35 Mbps down on that band (10x10), though of course upload speeds are poor. On the way here, I hit my highest-ever NR download speed: 201 Mbps, just north of where 290 WB merges into 281 for a bit. Uploads are low (~4 Mbps) and jitter was high, and I believe that was on 15 MHz of n71 plus >= 25 MHz of CA'd LTE (2+12+66 I think) but still impressive. I hit 179/22.7 right before. Basically as soon as we hit the Belterra shopping area west of Austin, the network went from being capacity constrained to...not. NR wasn't available for most of the trip, but LTE turned in some solid speeds (70/10) on T-Mobile. There was a point along the way where there was a near-complete dead zone...no Sprint, T-Mobile, or even AT&T roaming. I *might* have had 1x the entire time, but I think that even that dropped for about a half-mile. Sprint B26, then B25, were the first to come back, with T-Mobile B2 a mile or two later. If T-Mo put 600 wherever that Sprint site is on the west side of that dead zone, pretty sure there would be no more dead zone. As an aside, B12 lower-A/B are owned by West Central Wireless near Fredericksburg, so T-Mobile doesn't have B12 here, only B71 and mid-and. In contrast to T-Mobile's performance, Sprint had usable B41 most of the way, though there were points where my phone dipped to B25/26 if I didn't force 41. Actually got the fastest B41 download speeds I've seen on my phone around Deep Eddy, at 196/4 and 179/5. I think this was even on a MiniMacro rather than a full cell site. Finally, yesterday east of Pflugerville (east of Lake Pflugerville) I hit 86.7/46.6 on 10 MHz of n71. Yes, some of that was CA, and yes, that's in a sweet spot where you're at the edge of urban cell spacing but are on a sector pointed out into the countryside, but I'll take it. By contrast, Sprint's MiniMacro had poor service there.
    • They won't have to deploy midband RRUs to meet deployment requirements since 600/700/800 travels further, and the tech is the same for both. Midband will be solely a capacity play, since that'll get them 40 MHz of downlink and 15 MHz of uplink in most areas (see https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/wake-doj-deal-where-dish-s-spectrum-and-how-much-does-it-have). That's on top of low-band, which after n26 comes online will be 20x15 (albeit split over three different bands) at least, and a symmetric amount more in some markets. With a comparatively minuscule customer count, the network should fly with that amount of spectrum. My guess is that in three years Dish won't have touched 30% of the US population, so T-Mobile will be able to renew 600 licenses in those areas uncontested, including in plenty of rural areas, for another three years. For the remaining 70% of the US population (which will be a pretty small % of territory, so a rather small number of licenses), there'll be areas where Dish will try to squeak by with a low-band-only build, and *those* are the areas they'll be compete more on for spectrum leasing. For areas where there's enough traffic to build out mid-band, Dish may or may not need the extra 600...and those are probably the same areas T-Mobile will have a blanket of n41...so competition for that spectrum may be a bit more tepid, with the winner being whoever has more 600 sites lit since site density will determine capacity. One interesting thing to note here: Boost already sells a phone that's (partially) compatible with Dish's upcoming network: the S20 (n66 and n71). In pure dollar terms, they're subsidizing that phone the most our of their entire lineup, selling it at $720. Still spendy, but at least they'll have *some* phones in the field that support the new network, and as time goes on they'll be able to sell the S20 for cheaper. Assuming they're okay with folks dropping down to T-Mobile LTE for voice since the X55 modem can't do VoNR, and sitting primarily on n71 because the phone can't aggregate NR-NR. It's probably worthwhile for them to get a variant of the S20 recertified with n70, as that's adjacent to bands 66 and 25 so radio performance should still be fine. That would give the S20 access to their full native mid-band network on a phone most likely to be picked up by the folks who'd use the most data on their network. With all that said, I would *not* expect Dish to pick up any more 5G phones until they're able to get one with an X60 or equivalent modem; having a network spread across slices of five bands from the get-go means NR-NR aggregation is important, and it'll take VoNR to keep phones from dropping down to roaming on TMo to make phone calls. So I don't expect Boost will get the A51 5G or A71 5G...better to sell LTE-only phones and then introduce phones with better chipsets later, to avoid heavily subsidizing phones twice. Then, once you've got a $400 phone with VoNR, sell bundle it with two months of unlimited-everything service and you're off to the races. I figure we'll be at that point by this time next year, at which point I'll probably pick that phone up to see what Dish's network is like...as long as they allow tethering at full speed.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...