Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Wheaton remains a black hole for me, which is frustrating as I'm frequently there.

 

I think I'm getting a 4G signal off the tower at Central Dupage Hospital, but by and large the areas around there are still extremely poor. I know some people have claimed they were getting 4G from the Wheaton College campus but I was downtown Wheaton yesterday and I didn't see any 4G at all.

 

I put this together cause I was bored and bummed at everyone seeing LTE pop up everywhere and I can still barely stream Pandora.

 

qc8Oy.jpg

 

Wheaton test at Geneva / Schmale

Winfield test on Winfield road / Butterfield

Naperville test downtown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'm getting a 4G signal off the tower at Central Dupage Hospital, but by and large the areas around there are still extremely poor. I know some people have claimed they were getting 4G from the Wheaton College campus but I was downtown Wheaton yesterday and I didn't see any 4G at all.

 

I put this together cause I was bored and bummed at everyone seeing LTE pop up everywhere and I can still barely stream Pandora.

 

 

 

Wheaton test at Geneva / Schmale

Winfield test on Winfield road / Butterfield

Naperville test downtown.

 

 

mr0js.jpg

Winfield Rd. & Ferry

Warrenville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just heard that Sprint will start updating the S3 to JellyBean beginning tomorrow... Roll out should complete within a few weeks. : )

 

Do you know what the final build number is..?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using JB 4.1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be an obvious yes, but, will boost and virgin phones also be benefiting from faster 3G and better voice quality with these NV upgrades?

 

For speeds yes (postpaid and prepaid share the new back haul and cell sites), for coverage (1xAdv at 800), it depends on how they configure the Prl.

 

2 klatapaT gnisu III S yxalaG gnusmaS ym morf tnes

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anybody else noticed that on Sensorly, ATT coverage indicates very strong signal across large distances while Sprint seems to have strong signal only in very close proximity to the towers with signal dropping off rapidly beyond that? I'd attribute it to a quirk with Sensorly, but it does kind of seem like the Sprint LTE towers don't cover much ground in my experience. I can be right by a tower at Montrose and Broadway and walk up to Wilson and Racine, and LTE will disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T covers a much wider area per cell. That's why their signal seems to be stronger further away from the tower. Because of the signal type, Sprint has to place their towers closer together, and in densely populated areas, they put a severe downtilt on the cells so that they can maximize capacity, but it limits coverage. Some cells only cover a couple of blocks.

 

However, this will work in Sprint's favor, as it will help to keep them from getting overloaded as quickly at AT&T or Verizon will/have already since Sprint has denser coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With LTE performance, density is key. More dense, the faster the speeds can be maintained and more users per square mile can be accommodated. And when Sprint deploys LTE 800 next year, AT&T will have not have that advantage at all.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T covers a much wider area per cell. That's why their signal seems to be stronger further away from the tower. Because of the signal type, Sprint has to place their towers closer together, and in densely populated areas, they put a severe downtilt on the cells so that they can maximize capacity, but it limits coverage. Some cells only cover a couple of blocks.

 

However, this will work in Sprint's favor, as it will help to keep them from getting overloaded as quickly at AT&T or Verizon will/have already since Sprint has denser coverage.

 

Very interesting I never knew that. Is downtilt a physical characteristic of the installation or is the signal digitally "steerable"? ( I'm an audio guy and steerable line arrays are all the rage to let you control directivity of an array without physically moving it.) You'd think that they'd adjust tilt to cover large areas initially and then tilt them down as more sites are added...even if that caused the capacity to be spread thinner in the meantime, most customers would be happier if that 4G light stayed on more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting I never knew that. Is downtilt a physical characteristic of the installation or is the signal digitally "steerable"? ( I'm an audio guy and steerable line arrays are all the rage to let you control directivity of an array without physically moving it.) You'd think that they'd adjust tilt to cover large areas initially and then tilt them down as more sites are added...even if that caused the capacity to be spread thinner in the meantime, most customers would be happier if that 4G light stayed on more.

 

Physical. Tilting them once, and then going back and changing them again would be a lot of work. That would probably slow down the progress. I'm sure it was something they considered, but doing it this way is more efficient. And they need to be as efficient as they can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the northern Indiana area, I've noticed that within the last week the Lte signal has been moving further east. I work at multiple steel mills in Lake County (ArcelorMittal East/West & US Steel) and a few weeks ago I would only pick up Lte at the far west mill. I noticed a significantly strong signal today further east at US Steel in Gary. Attached is a screen shot of a speed test i took on Buchanan Street.

post-6488-0-13690800-1351211228_thumb.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got my Galaxy Note 2 today and switched from AT&T to Sprint. I'm ready to start experiencing some LTE goodness.

 

Which field test app is the best one to use?

 

 

I think most on this site recommend the app "sensorly". It is a good app and is very informative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think most on this site recommend the app "sensorly". It is a good app and is very informative.

 

Already using Sensorly but I didn't think they provided the same information that some of the others do. I'll have to take another look.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for you guys...I'm able to get LTE at my house in a few places. I wanted to use my LTE connection to help seed a torrent for a very popular ROM. I'm not one to abuse tethering by any stretch, I usually only use it when I'm in a bind, but wanted to help get this file out to the masses and my home internet isn't that great.

 

I was able to run a speedtest with the speedtest.net app, and I was pushing 10.0-10.5 Mbps upload speeds. I thought that would be nice for a little while, but while running Wifi Tether 3.2-beta2 I was only pushing about 60kBps upload, which would come out to like 0.6Mbps. Anyone know why that would happen?

 

I've read that speedtest.net isn't all that accurate, but I thought that was a pretty big discrepancy so I wanted to see if you guys had any thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for you guys...I'm able to get LTE at my house in a few places. I wanted to use my LTE connection to help seed a torrent for a very popular ROM. I'm not one to abuse tethering by any stretch, I usually only use it when I'm in a bind, but wanted to help get this file out to the masses and my home internet isn't that great.

 

I was able to run a speedtest with the speedtest.net app, and I was pushing 10.0-10.5 Mbps upload speeds. I thought that would be nice for a little while, but while running Wifi Tether 3.2-beta2 I was only pushing about 60kBps upload, which would come out to like 0.6Mbps. Anyone know why that would happen?

 

I've read that speedtest.net isn't all that accurate, but I thought that was a pretty big discrepancy so I wanted to see if you guys had any thoughts.

 

At face value, I'd wonder if you still had an LTE connection, or the signal degraded greatly. Outside of that, I would wonder if Sprint is cracking down on tethering on its new network.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for you guys...I'm able to get LTE at my house in a few places. I wanted to use my LTE connection to help seed a torrent for a very popular ROM. I'm not one to abuse tethering by any stretch, I usually only use it when I'm in a bind, but wanted to help get this file out to the masses and my home internet isn't that great.

 

I was able to run a speedtest with the speedtest.net app, and I was pushing 10.0-10.5 Mbps upload speeds. I thought that would be nice for a little while, but while running Wifi Tether 3.2-beta2 I was only pushing about 60kBps upload, which would come out to like 0.6Mbps. Anyone know why that would happen?

 

I've read that speedtest.net isn't all that accurate, but I thought that was a pretty big discrepancy so I wanted to see if you guys had any thoughts.

 

Don't torrent on mobile networks. Each cell is shared by almost 100 people or more. If you're torrenting it will slow everyone else down. Use your own connection to torrent. You're not going to be able to seed via Sprint's network anyways as NAT is in place. Speedtest.net is decently accurate, you're not going to get results that are that extremely far off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At face value, I'd wonder if you still had an LTE connection, or the signal degraded greatly. Outside of that, I would wonder if Sprint is cracking down on tethering on its new network.

 

It's likely that the application was using 1xA or 3G instead of LTE due to device compatibility issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't torrent on mobile networks. Each cell is shared by almost 100 people or more. If you're torrenting it will slow everyone else down. Use your own connection to torrent. You're not going to be able to seed via Sprint's network anyways as NAT is in place. Speedtest.net is decently accurate, you're not going to get results that are that extremely far off.

 

I don't know what NAT is off the top of my head, but thanks for the response. Again, this isn't something I would normally practice and it was at about 1:00-1:30 this morning. Not something I would do at any other point in time.

 

I wasn't trying to seed right from my phone, all files were on my laptop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Physical. Tilting them once, and then going back and changing them again would be a lot of work. That would probably slow down the progress. I'm sure it was something they considered, but doing it this way is more efficient. And they need to be as efficient as they can be.

 

There are two adjustments for downtilt. One physical to start. Then after that the three sections inside the one panel have independent downtilt adjustments that can be done thousands of miles away. They can change the tilt of 800, pcs evdo/1x, and pcs lte all independently.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Returned to my apartment in the city tonight. I live ~200m from a 4g site that is posted on the maps (Near Diversey brown line). Have seen 2.5mbps max, and the far side of my house can't even pick up the 4g. This is significantly worse than wimax, but I'm almost directly next to the tower.

 

Phone service does seem better here than in western suburbs, at least.

 

Anyone else in this Chicago area?

 

Edit: Signal is -115 and I'm 200m away with virtually a clear line of sight. Tower at 2775 N Sheffield must not be turned on yet, although it appears on maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...