Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

the tower i ahve been commenting on (CH50XC246) that has already been accepted had workers at it today. i stopped and talked to them and they were removing all of the legacy equipment. They ahd it all loaded up by the time i left adn they showed me the new equipment that in installed (this is old news ofcourse) and the backhaul lines feeding into the NV box. They work for a sub contracted company based out of Rockford. The tower is fully complete with all the NV equipment and backhaul.

I thought it a little odd that i havent noticed any 4g signal coming from this tower and i have been checking multiple times a day since last May. according the them it is just waiting on them to hit the switch though...

 

BTW still no ehrpd in the north chicagoland area since about 2 weeks ago.

 

Site deinstall has no bearing on LTE upgrades, only 3G upgrades. The legacy hardware can be removed before LTE is completed, because LTE does not use any legacy components at all. Only the 1x and 3G do.

 

The LTE may be complete at this site, but I can tell you as of this past weekend, Sprint has not accepted the site as complete with LTE upgrades.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True it covers the whole town of Kenosha while they won't get LTE until Milwaukee does. But I'm excited because the other day I read the article and it listed my town. http://s4gru.com/ind...k-is-under-way/

 

Sent From EVO LTE

 

This is no indication of LTE imminence in Southern Wisconsin. The sites in Southern Wisconsin near the Illinois border must have eHRPD when the adjacent Chicago sites across the border in Illinois go live. In order for LTE data to seamlessly transfer to 3G data when someone crosses the border (or vice versa), then all the sites they would transfer to must have eHRPD. Otherwise there will be a hard handoff. This is true of all LTE market boundaries. eHRPD is being deployed in many non LTE markets where there is any chance of being handed off from a LTE connection.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is no indication of LTE imminence in Southern Wisconsin. The sites in Southern Wisconsin near the Illinois border must have eHRPD when the adjacent Chicago sites across the border in Illinois go live. In order for LTE data to seamlessly transfer to 3G data when someone crosses the border (or vice versa), then all the sites they would transfer to must have eHRPD. Otherwise there will be a hard handoff. This is true of all LTE market boundaries. eHRPD is being deployed in many non LTE markets where there is any chance of being handed off from a LTE connection.

 

Robert

thanks Robert good read once again :D

 

Sent From EVO LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for all my Chicago buddies on this site, how is the coverage and speeds on 3G in your personal experience? I'm porting my cousin over from T-Mobile to Sprint, but am concerned how the network is currently.

 

I checked the maps and he has a NV site a block from his apartment, but what about the rest of the city proper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for all my Chicago buddies on this site, how is the coverage and speeds on 3G in your personal experience? I'm porting my cousin over from T-Mobile to Sprint, but am concerned how the network is currently.

 

I checked the maps and he has a NV site a block from his apartment, but what about the rest of the city proper?

 

Not good right now but improvements are on the way. I would not port over to Sprint just yet. He'll see a significant decrease in speed moving from Tmobile to Sprint right now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for all my Chicago buddies on this site, how is the coverage and speeds on 3G in your personal experience? I'm porting my cousin over from T-Mobile to Sprint, but am concerned how the network is currently.

 

I checked the maps and he has a NV site a block from his apartment, but what about the rest of the city proper?

 

I'd wait until Chicago land is officially launched.

 

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for all my Chicago buddies on this site, how is the coverage and speeds on 3G in your personal experience? I'm porting my cousin over from T-Mobile to Sprint, but am concerned how the network is currently.

 

I checked the maps and he has a NV site a block from his apartment, but what about the rest of the city proper?

 

Do you know what neighborhood your friend lives in? The loop area can be pretty damn good for Sprint, but some of the northern neighborhoods (Uptown, Edgewater, some parts of Lincoln Park, etc…) can really drag.

 

… He'll see a significant decrease in speed moving from Tmobile to Sprint right now.

 

This. T-Mo is fantastic in Chicago. My friends who are on it consistently get 2-3Mbps on speed tests (even at Cubs games), with spikes up to 6 or 7. They like to taunt me with their results. :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So for all my Chicago buddies on this site, how is the coverage and speeds on 3G in your personal experience? I'm porting my cousin over from T-Mobile to Sprint, but am concerned how the network is currently.

 

I checked the maps and he has a NV site a block from his apartment, but what about the rest of the city proper?

 

I'd definitely hold off as its really been erratic at best ! I don't have access to the maps, but it seems to me, and maybe I'm wrong, but the LTE launch that was initially expected late summer / early fall looks to be more like the end of the year? I hope it's sooner, but if they are doing the city last as they are working outside to inside then that's a lot of towers still needing service work in Chicago proper.

 

sent from my G III via tapatalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

…I don't have access to the maps, but it seems to me, and maybe I'm wrong, but the LTE launch that was initially expected late summer / early fall looks to be more like the end of the year? I hope it's sooner, but if they are doing the city last as they are working outside to inside then that's a lot of towers still needing service work in Chicago proper.

 

I believe the plan was to have the Chicago market (which really extends out to Rockford) go live late this month with a completion date of December:

http://s4gru.com/ind...chedule-update/

 

There are some more recent posts that seem to indicate that the market might not go live until October with an estimated completion of January, so it was really just pushed back a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, the initial word I remember hearing and this was from way back when it was first announced that Chicago would be in the 2nd group after the KC group, was the end of August. This was coming from a Sprint employee in KC that worked at the HQ.

 

For the last 2 years I've been splitting time in KC and Chicago, but primarily in KC, until the end of June, and now back in Chicago almost all the time.

 

What's crazy is this whole last year, while they were upgrading KC I guess I almost never noticed anything like the service issues and ''transition'' craziness that I've been dealing with here in Chicago? I wonder why that is, because other than tweaking my home agent setting, I consistently got at least 400k connection- most times it was around 750k, and NEVER this unusable 10-30k connection I'm suffering with lately here in downtown.

 

sent from my G III via tapatalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheese and rice! You can't make this stuff up! If Sprint announced Chicago launched on the 21st, S4GRU forum space would probably fill up.

 

Ok actually read the article. Looks like they are going to do what S4GRU has been asking for all along and making the sites discoverable. They even have a term for it. "pre-launch mode"

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Ya I read that before but still curious not so much with dropping calls because of hard handoff but why the data connection is basically running at 5-10k. The towers are there and running and I'm in downtown and have 5 towers close enough to pull a signal in from at my place- at least 1 is ehrc.

 

What I'm saying is there is definitely something different probably in the allowance of crippled service compared to when KC was upgrading, as it is Sprint's headquarters. Swapping out gear and dropping calls don't equate with weeks on end of 1rxtt service, or the article doesn't expound on this and maybe I just don't know how and why this would be the cause and the case.

 

sent from my G III via tapatalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that there's a few reasons. Sprint had less spectrum in Chicago (thinking pre G block). Chicago has a lot more people. Back haul has taken forever. KC is home base for Sprint, Chicago is not the only crippled Sprint network out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That would be awesome. Robert' date=' can you tell if the quoted document looks authentic based on your past experience with Sprint docs?[/quote']

 

Yes.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question I have is, will all completed NV towers have LTE? I have two towers very close to me that have 3G and 800 MHz complete. My 3G speeds are consistently 1.5-2.1Mbps so I can't wait to see what LTE brings.

 

Sent from my Evo 4G LTE going through AnthraX withdrawal!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question I have is' date=' will all completed NV towers have LTE? I have two towers very close to me that have 3G and 800 MHz complete. My 3G speeds are consistently 1.5-2.1Mbps so I can't wait to see what LTE brings.

 

Sent from my Evo 4G LTE going through AnthraX withdrawal![/quote']

 

Yes, for the most part. There are less than 100 Sprint CDMA sites that will not receive LTE. When you consider Sprint has over 38,000 CDMA sites, less than 100 is a very small percentage. The only sites that will not get LTE are sites where Sprint cannot install it because of a limiting factor.

 

Since you appear to already have a site with upgraded backhaul, it seems highly likely you will get LTE. And probably pretty soon.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things have gotten worse in Elgin. This morning speeds were really bad. Not even usable and now its kind of ok. I really have no idea why it fluctuates like this. I guess it can only get better. I hope sept 21 will be the day they flip on the new equipment.

 

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...