Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Interesting, I wonder if you caught the crews running the new equipment through the paces during an installation....

I ahve been checking the towers as there are two right near me along 294 and golf road. i havent seen any crews yet. not to say that i couldnt miss them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might just mean that the network software is being updated to eHRPD in preparation for LTE to start coming online.

 

Sent from my CM9 Toro

well that would be good news. I did notice all of the June LTE towers in the updated map.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid question.......but will you only see eHRPD as the network on Netmonitor if you have an LTE capable device? Or will it show on my 3G/WiMax phone.....?

 

Sent from my Epic 4G (WiSuck) using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid question.......but will you only see eHRPD as the network on Netmonitor if you have an LTE capable device? Or will it show on my 3G/WiMax phone.....?

 

Sent from my Epic 4G (WiSuck) using Forum Runner

 

eHRPD ssessions can only be connected in a LTE device. A WiMax device will only connect to an EVDO session.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eHRPD ssessions can only be connected in a LTE device. A WiMax device will only connect to an EVDO session.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Is this because eHRPD handles the seamless 3G to LTE and LTE to 3G transitions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

eHRPD ssessions can only be connected in a LTE device. A WiMax device will only connect to an EVDO session.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Thanks Robert.

 

Sent from my Epic 4G (WiSuck) using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this because eHRPD handles the seamless 3G to LTE and LTE to 3G transitions?

 

No. It's possible to create a 3G only device that could run on eHRPD. However, eHRPD was created to allow LTE devices to seamlessly transfer back and forth to EVDO. So, only a LTE device needs eHRPD.

 

eHRPD is EVDO-A, and doesn't have better speeds (all things being equal). In a completed NV site, eHRPD and EVDO-A share the same backhaul. However, EVDO data goes to the Sprint MSC Switch and eHRPD goes to the 4G DDC (Core). So on a complete NV site, EVDO and eHRPD should have nearly identical speeds. However, if there is a bottleneck at the Switch, it is possible that EVDO could be slower than eHRPD. Also, the reverse is true, but less likely.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. It's possible to create a 3G only device that could run on eHRPD. However, eHRPD was created to allow LTE devices to seamlessly transfer back and forth to EVDO. So, only a LTE device needs eHRPD.

 

eHRPD is EVDO-A, and doesn't have better speeds (all things being equal). In a completed NV site, eHRPD and EVDO-A share the same backhaul. However, EVDO data goes to the Sprint MSC Switch and eHRPD goes to the 4G DDC (Core). So on a complete NV site, EVDO and eHRPD should have nearly identical speeds. However, if there is a bottleneck at the Switch, it is possible that EVDO could be slower than eHRPD. Also, the reverse is true, but less likely.

 

Robert

 

:o you're so smart........ lol ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Pleasant surprise at work this morning.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

Do you work in a lead lined building? That's a weak signal for being relatively close.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you work in a lead lined building? That's a weak signal for being relatively close.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

See comments in this prior thread in the Samsung forum here about testing aerxx's signal performance with a GS3 in his workplace. What we don't have are any controlled comparison tests of other devices at this location.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Do you work in a lead lined building? That's a weak signal for being relatively close.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Home Depot.....

 

My OG EPIC was about the same.....maybe one bar better.

 

This is standing outside at the same location....

http://www.imgur.com/pr8Hm.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home Depot.....

 

My OG EPIC was about the same.....maybe one bar better.

 

Okay, now you have confused me. We started this conversation with you reporting,:

 

I get half the bars indoors that my OG EPIC would get..

 

Then you did some more testing of your GS3, and said:

 

1bar -101dbm

2bar -97dbm

 

This is what I have been averaging all day inside work.

 

You did not correct my extrapolation of that:

 

And your old Epic 4G was typically 3 bars or better in the same location? (That would correspond to -91 dBm or better on my reference scale.)

 

And now you say the Epic 4G's performance "was about the same" after all? Sorry, but this seems like a wild goose chase. It goes to show that anecdotal reports of performance, especially those that rely on somebody's subjective memory, are not very reliable. There has to be some controlled testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day of testing is what was reported and I wasnt connected to eHRPD. I dont know if thats the difference or not. Im going to assume it is.

 

I kook forward to reading anyone elses results.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One day of testing is what was reported and I wasnt connected to eHRPD. I dont know if thats the difference or not. Im going to assume it is.

There doesn't seem to be any significant difference with this eHPRD report and your earlier tests of the GS3 performance. My point is that your recollections of your old Epic 4G's performance at the same site have been all over the lot, which led to confusing comparisons.

.

EDIT: I don't mean this personally. None of us can really trust our subjective memories on stuff like this. That's why scientists do double-blind studies, etc. I know I have no reliable memory of what my phone's historical performance has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the term "half" shouldnt have been used. I now get 1 bar where I used to get 2. I get 2 where it used to fluxuate 3 and 4. In my eyes, that would make this phones antenna perform half as well as my EPIC. Even as I was typing this....my signal went anywhere from no service to 3 bars.

 

What made me say that its "about the same" today, is because I still have the same slow speeds and inconsistant signal that I have always had inside my work.

 

Like I said...I cant wait to see what everyone else sees.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be any significant difference with this eHPRD report and your earlier tests of the GS3 peformance.

.

 

This was a bad assumtion on my part. I thought I read somewhere that eHRPD sessions had a higher signal strength.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a bad assumtion on my part. I thought I read somewhere that eHRPD sessions had a higher signal strength.....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Forum Runner

 

I don't know if I would say eHRPD has higher signal strength. But what can happen: if you are comparing an EVDO legacy signal to an eHRPD signal from a Network Vision site, there may be some improvement. However, I personally would never say that eHRPD has a stronger signal than EVDO, because that would not be true technically.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

workers at Tower CH13XC009 In Glenview @ Glenview Road and Greenwood. New radios r up and they are huge. Also they installed a fiber backhual through the gas station and down the street a good 100 yards or so to whatever it is they connect the fiber to.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...