Jump to content

4G or 4G LTE indicator?


kkstp09

Recommended Posts

you are nitpicking. if you walk up and down the hall ways of your job right now and ask every joe and jane end user what kindof 4G they connect to, they will surely give you the who farted face.

 

This is certainly true in my office. Most of my coworkers tune me out, or know not to mention wireless networks or devices in my presence.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If all your worried about is marketing just call LTE 5G and LTE-A 6G 3GPP/ITU-R be damned. As long as its not EVDO or HSPA using a 4G indicator on the phone is fine by me. People who want to know can dig into the status page on the phone or get a widget that displays it. This is all just my two cents but I think they made the gap between 3G and 4G too wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as long as i get multiple mbps up and down, i dont care what its called... 4G is fine with me..... having it say LTE on it is a fanboy thing. its an lte phone, get a life, and then kill yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole 4G nomenclature is annoying in my opinion on iOS devices. I was in Vegas last week, and a guy who works with my girl was on his AT&T iPhone showing off how it was a 4G iPhone :wall:

 

I gave up trying to explain the difference, and sent back to the pool to drink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole 4G nomenclature is annoying in my opinion on iOS devices. I was in Vegas last week, and a guy who works with my girl was on his AT&T iPhone showing off how it was a 4G iPhone :wall:

 

I gave up trying to explain the difference, and sent back to the pool to drink.

 

Its best not to think about it. Lets the ignorant stay ignorant I guess. iOS is suppose to have a "LTE" icon like it does on the iPad 3 in the screenshots above and the Google Nexus phones just say "4G" if they are connected to LTE. There is never going to be one uniform icon to let you know you are connected over LTE so its no point in thinking about it anymore.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its best not to think about it. Lets the ignorant stay ignorant I guess. iOS is suppose to have a "LTE" icon like it does on the iPad 3 in the screenshots above and the Google Nexus phones just say "4G" if they are connected to LTE. There is never going to be one uniform icon to let you know you are connected over LTE so its no point in thinking about it anymore.

 

I agree, I normally don't worry, just bugs me as a phone guy :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that WiMax, LTE and HSPA+ are not 4G tech as they do not meet the speed requirements set forth by the ITU. However, The ITU added WiMax, LTE and HSPA+ to the list of 4G technologies http://www.intomobile.com/2010/12/18/itu-reverses-its-decision-lte-wimax-and-hspa-are-now-4g/ opening the door for AT&T to pressure Apple to change the icon for HSPA+ to "4G."

 

I think it should still be WiMax 2 and LTE-Advanced being the only technologies allowed to be marketed as 4G. What is the point of having a standard, if you aren't going to enforce it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that WiMax, LTE and HSPA+ are not 4G tech as they do not meet the speed requirements set forth by the ITU. However, The ITU added WiMax, LTE and HSPA+ to the list of 4G technologies http://www.intomobil...spa-are-now-4g/ opening the door for AT&T to pressure Apple to change the icon for HSPA+ to "4G."

 

I think it should still be WiMax 2 and LTE-Advanced being the only technologies allowed to be marketed as 4G. What is the point of having a standard, if you aren't going to enforce it?

 

Apple got fined for doing that in Australia.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57449364-37/apple-settles-australian-ipad-4g-case-for-$2.25m/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with a lot of the sentiment behind the true 4G comments. However, IMHO, the standard the ITU requiring a 10x increase in theoretical speeds for each subsequent generation is a little ridiculous.

 

I think now with the really high speeds we are starting to get, it is unreasonable to expect a 10x jump in speeds. I think a tripling of speeds, or maybe quadrupling would be sufficient to mark the next "G." But to me, no matter how you slice it, HSPA+ is 3G. Now, dual carrier HSPA+ could be considered a 4G technology by a tripling standard.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...