Jump to content

GS3 and 4G LTE


niv3d
 Share

Recommended Posts

So im really leaning towards getting the GS3. However I'm not up for an upgrade for another year. I'm considering doing sprints early buyout upgrade promotion(http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1655591). But my question is. Would it be worth it to get the GS3 now? LTE I believe is slated for end of 2012 early 2013 in my area (Orlando, FL market). I currently own the E4GT.

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, since neither Sprint or Samsung have announced when the GS3 will be coming to Sprint, I think you have some time to make that decision. From other threads around here it seems that it will be fall at the earliest, maybe later.

 

You have some time to think about it for sure. By then your upgrade buyout would be less and there could be other devices that might be coming soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I don't remember where I read it, it may have been here, but the quad-core processors right now aren't supporting LTE well(maybe at all). If I'm wrong on reading that please correct me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the rumours for the US GS3 are actually June... http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/samsung-galaxy-s3-available-in-the-us-on-june-1-for-800-1081562

 

One of many rumors.

 

Also the only quad core GS3 in the states is apparently the ATT version

 

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert put some info about upcoming devices in this post:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-170-new-flagship-4g-lte-device-in-sprint-lenexa-labs-for-testing/

 

As you can see in the screenshot, Sprint's internal lab schedules show that the next two devices (which are still undisclosed at this time) won't be finished with Sprint lab testing until mid-August. Launch date for the data card is 9/16 and smartphone launch date is TDB.

 

A rumored June date for the Sprint GS3 just doesn't seem likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't possible that the SGS III wouldn't be tested through Sprint's labs(like the iPhone)?

 

It is possible. But it would be a first. Previous Samsung devices have gone through the labs. To date, only the iPhone has not. But there is a first for everything, right?

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint & Samsung might be purposely not releasing the GS3 until fall for a variety of reasons. First, Sprint would like to have the sales of the previously released phones to build, and not flood their customers with too many choices too quickly. They have worked very closely with HTC to make sure they had an EVO LTE that was really a superphone, and I'm sure they want it to sell well. They would like people to come over to sprint for the new EVO LTE now, then introduce the GS3 and gain another wave of customers. Secondly, If they want the GS3 to have the quad core processor (even though it might be redundant/overkill) to work with LTE, that is rumored to be upcoming in the fall. Thirdly, they might want to time it up so that it will release before/near the iPhone5 to take away some of the market share. (the last one would be a samsung idea, as sprint is deeply committed to the iPhone)

 

I believe if it is to be delayed these would be the most likely reasons, but do not cover all the reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the EVO LTE is making its way to market in the late May/June timeframe, and the next Jesus Phone is coming in October, it seems the next window for a new device would likely be July/August (about one year after the SGS2).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the EVO LTE is making its way to market in the late May/June timeframe' date=' and the next Jesus Phone is coming in October, it seems the next window for a new device would likely be July/August (about one year after the SGS2).[/quote']

 

And about the time the first contract buyers of the OG Epic are starting to come off contract.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And about the time the first contract buyers of the OG Epic are starting to come off contract.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

I'm using a OG epic and my contract is actually up on 6/1. I bought it they day it came out.

 

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm using a OG epic and my contract is actually up on 6/1. I bought it they day it came out.

 

Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2

 

With no keyboard equipped phones to go to :(

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there are more than 5 people in line for a smart phone I will not be joining them. No matter how much I like the device.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no offense, but people who wait in lines to buy a phone (especially those sheep going from their iphone4 to an iphone4s!) should repeat the following....

 

i

am

sofa

king

we

todd

did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no offense, but people who wait in lines to buy a phone (especially those sheep going from their iphone4 to an iphone4s!) should repeat the following....

 

i

am

sofa

king

we

todd

did

 

I said it, but all that happened is the dog looked at me, tilted her head slightly and walked away. Is it supposed to give me patience to wait in line longer? Should I repeat it while waiting in line? :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it, but all that happened is the dog looked at me, tilted her head slightly and walked away. Is it supposed to give me patience to wait in line longer? Should I repeat it while waiting in line? :lol:

 

Yep...but do it while whipping the dog with an iPhone cable

 

 

BTW, isn't Samsung the one making fun of the iPhone people for waiting in line in their own commercials? Is it subliminal envy that they'd love to have people lined up for their phones too??

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yep...but do it while whipping the dog with an iPhone cable

 

BTW' date=' isn't Samsung the one making fun of the iPhone people for waiting in line in their own commercials? Is it subliminal envy that they'd love to have people lined up for their phones too??[/quote']

 

I'm sure they wouldn't mind in the least.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

And about the time the first contract buyers of the OG Epic are starting to come off contract.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

I've become addicted to having each Galaxy S variant for Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I line

I've become addicted to having each Galaxy S variant for Sprint.

 

If I had yearly upgrades instead of the standard two years, I probably would have ended up with an E4GT. Or maybe a Photon...who knows. Seems like I like to stick with phones in the same series though...my HTC Touch Pro (6850 I think) replaced the Mogul (6700) and now my GSIII has replaced a Galaxy S variant. Yeah, Samsung had me at AMOLED.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I line

 

If I had yearly upgrades instead of the standard two years, I probably would have ended up with an E4GT. Or maybe a Photon...who knows. Seems like I like to stick with phones in the same series though...my HTC Touch Pro (6850 I think) replaced the Mogul (6700) and now my GSIII has replaced a Galaxy S variant. Yeah, Samsung had me at AMOLED.

 

I got my E4GT through a themer who was switching to Verizon. Got it for about the same price as an upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I line

 

If I had yearly upgrades instead of the standard two years, I probably would have ended up with an E4GT. Or maybe a Photon...who knows. Seems like I like to stick with phones in the same series though...my HTC Touch Pro (6850 I think) replaced the Mogul (6700) and now my GSIII has replaced a Galaxy S variant. Yeah, Samsung had me at AMOLED.

 

The mogul was the 6800, the apache was the 6700 which I still have to this day and it works pretty well. I really loved my apache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • That's actually really useful information when trying to locate/map these. On CellMapper, if I look for B46 it cuts through a lot of th noise.
    • Crunching the numbers a bit more, covering the full MSA would result in slightly under 80% population coverage. But they'd have to deploy on essentially every micro/macro cell in the area.   Yeah, I'm not gonna pretend like I know how either negotiations with squatters or Auction 108 will pan out. That said, I can't see 3.45GHz being *that* valuable to squatters considering the strict buildout requirements.  Another interesting thought I had was a possible spectrum trade with Dish. Dish is still leasing 600MHz to T-Mobile in quite a few metro areas, and I'm sure T-Mobile is looking ahead to what their lowband spectrum situation will be once those leases expire. If T-Mobile is truly going to rely on n71+n41 CA as much as they say they will, it sure would be nice to be working with more than 5MHz-10MHz of n71 uplink capacity. Don't go quoting me on that, though, total (pipedream) speculation haha.
    • Great job on your analysis of small cells versus the 3.45GHZ and the population coverage requirements. I wonder if the fcc is stalling because they may address the key limitation of of 2.5: the convoluted frequencies. Not sure how they would get there, but it would be better public policy if you could actually use a single license in current times, ie 5, 10 or 20MHz. Of course they could also go in more of a nonprofit or small business direction. But most likely they will keep it as planned given how messy the transition would be. In many/most metro areas BRS/EBS is fully licensed. Would be nice if they put pressure on the squatters.
    • I didn't actually look at the buildout requirements before making that comment - they're definitely going to have to deploy on macro sites if they want to hit the buildout requirements. PEA001 has a population of 25,237,061, of which they will have to hit 45% in 4 years (11,356,677) and 80% in 8 years (20,189,649). If they were to cover the entirely, all five boroughs, of NYC using only small cells (something I'd say is impossible considering their current small cell density), they'd only be covering 32% of the population in the PEA. And this is with spectrum that only adds 300Mb/s per sector and will likely have only 50% the range of their current n41 equipment. Doesn't really seem worth it to me. I'm of the opinion that they're looking to hedge their bets in further EBS/BRS acquisition. 
    • These strand mounts also are deployed with Band 46 (LAA), in my experience. I have yet to encounter a strand mount with exclusively 2/66. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...