Jump to content

utiz4321

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Content count

    1,584
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

utiz4321 last won the day on March 8

utiz4321 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,254 Wireless Expert

About utiz4321

  • Rank
    Member Level: 4G WiMax

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    iphone
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    phoenix
  • Here for...
    4G Information
  • Favorite Quotation
    what?
  • Interests
    everything

Recent Profile Visitors

4,827 profile views
  1. Each user has a cost to the company for them being a customer. It use to be called cash cost per user but I am not sure what they are calling it now. More customers are not always better if they cost you more to have than they pay in.
  2. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    I dont see the point of these things. Mergers are not and should not be a matter of Democratic will.
  3. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    Maybe, maybe not. Decreased competition doesnt always lead to higher margins for all players.
  4. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    I dont think they will. This admin. Put promarket people in the FCC and DOJ. The FCC is judt going to rubber stamp it, the DOJ might question it a bit more but it will go through as is.
  5. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    They dont have the money to build a competitive network and pay their debts. They can only grow through discounting meaning they would need to add massive amounts of customers to grow top line revenue. Where are they going to come from? Not VZW or ATT their customers that are price sensitive have already jumped to T mobile or sprint and sprint wont build a network that matches theirs. So for sprint to become health they would have to start taking a stick to T-mobile but that just reverses the current market we have. We are going to three players, you might have three players because of a bankruptcy or 3 players and a zombie fourth company lerching along but not relevant.
  6. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    Just the statement "if it aint broke dont fix it". Not what it referred to.
  7. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    That is an anti-innovation statement. Things can work and still be improved upon. The model T would work but i am glad someone decided to mess with it.
  8. I cant think of one time sprint wasnt able to handle an upload. They know more about how people use their phones than you or I do.
  9. Your not speaking for anyone. Sprint's job is to manage the network it a way makes sense for their user base and they do a good job of it. If you are up loading a picture spoiler it can continue to happen when you put it in your pocket. Video calls are about the most taxing thing you can do on the upload side and it works just fine with sprint's current configuration.
  10. Nope. Please learn about what you are talking about before you start posting nonsense all over the public space. The other carriers dont have the option of allocating spectrum the war sprint can or they would. It has nothing to do with what one of the companies "know" amd the others do not and all about the way the spectrum is used.
  11. No. The math says that. Which is why the designed their network the way they did. The amount of data used in uploads are a fraction of downloads.
  12. Why would they? They dont need the bandwidth on the upload side. You down load far more than you upload.
  13. It is a deliberate choice on the part of sprint on how it uses it's 2.5 spectrum. They can allocate the spectrum Used in their channels in multiple ways and they have choosen to maximize download speeds because you simply don't need as much band width on the upload side.
  14. utiz4321

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    If it doesnt 5g is really going to suck.
×