Jump to content


S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


centermedic last won the day on December 29 2017

centermedic had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

598 Trusted

About centermedic

  • Rank
    Member Level: 4G WiMax

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    Essential PH-1,Moto Z Force, HTC BOLT, HTC 10 (spare), HTC One(M8, spare), Slate 8, HTC One(M7, spare)
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
  • Here for...

Recent Profile Visitors

5,147 profile views
  1. centermedic

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    I agree. The phone is much better now. The camera app works flawlessly now and the signal does seem to be a bit stronger as the phone now holds on to a signal where it used to drop and I can pick up LTE where I was only getting 1 x before. However, it still has a death grip on B26.
  2. centermedic

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    Thats odd. In my experience, the Essential holds onto 800 like a death grip. It is actually frustrating at times.
  3. centermedic

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    Update came through today. NMK24B.
  4. centermedic

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    It looks like they tried some trading off on RF reception on this phone. I have also noted that it is not great on 1x. However, it holds onto 800 almost excessively so. Its 1900 and 2500 reception is about on par with my Bolt.
  5. centermedic

    Oh HTC :(

    The 10 was a pretty good phone although I missed my true dual speaker set up.
  6. centermedic

    Oh HTC :(

    Yup. The wife likes her Moto so far. I just made sure she had a screen protector on day one!
  7. centermedic

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    Just picked up an essential phone. So far it seems like a very nice phone. The only thing I do not like is it seems to excessively hold on to B26. Other than that I just have to get used to what is basically vanilla android and the finger sensor being on the back.
  8. centermedic

    Oh HTC :(

    After almost ten years of nothing but HTC cell phones, we had to go in another direction. Picked up a moto Z Force for the wife to replace her A9 and I got an essential phone to replace my HTC 10. Really wanted to stay with HTC but they have nothing to compel me to pay the amount of money that they want for their phones. It is almost as if they are no longer trying which is too bad.
  9. centermedic

    Streaming Services Chat

    We cut the cord about a year ago. We now have Playstation Vue, Amazon Prime and Netflix. We could not be happier.
  10. Still going to have to disagree. What you are proposing is a self-fulfilling prophecy where innovations such as the internet could not exist without government investment. If you are supporting the idea that government has a significant role in innovation and only the government has the economic size to leverage investments into new technologies then your entire argument falls apart. Also, explain to me how the government is dividing up anybody's profits. As I said before, article two leveled out the playing field. In my opinion, this is necessary as long as there is not sufficient competition. What I find interesting is that I have yet to hear anybody propose scrapping the legal cable monopolies. Now that is a case of government control that reaches far beyond article two.
  11. I disagree. The internet has spent considerably more time without article two.
  12. Ok. So you are really going to have to spell this out for me because I am having visions of Fields of Dreams right now. Not at all. I want everybody to have access to the internet as it was developed [ed by the government(read people). Kudos to business for building it out BUT and this is a big but, it is provided by companies that are already under regulation for good reason. Replace those companies with unregulated companies in sufficient numbers then I will be all for trashing title 2. Currently, there is a situation where companies can dictate to other companies how much they will pay for access rather than having the same pricing plan for everybody. Case in point.... The streaming video company’s filing provides much more detail about its negotiations with Comcast earlier this year that led it to pay for more direct access to Comcast’s internet customers. “In Netflix’s experience, there are four ISPs that have the market power to engage in degradation strategies to harm OVDs,” Netflix wrote, referring to internet service providers (ISPs) intentionally slowing down traffic from online video distributors (OVDs). “Two of those four propose to merge in this transaction.” https://qz.com/256586/the-inside-story-of-how-netflix-came-to-pay-comcast-for-internet-traffic/
  13. Until such time as ISP's are no longer legal monopolies, yes. Just to be clear, I understand that an ISP is not a legal monopoly. However, the companies which provide internet access are mostly legal monopolies or must abide by high levels of regulation due to their core business ie: cable companies and Telephone companies. Until such time that we can introduce enough competition into the arena, consumers should be afforded some level of protection in order to keep the internet a viable economic engine.
  14. I never indicated if I was for or against the 2015 net neutrality regulations or the new regulations. I was simply making a statement. Having said that, I do not believe that Net Neutrality was a heavy-handed regulation. I would like to see the playing field to remain as free and level as possible. That will allow the internet to continue its growth and feed the economy. There is a similar argument regarding state sales taxes and purchasing via the internet. What is the right balance? That argument will continue through several administrations.
  15. That's a stretch at best as roads are generally not built specifically for a grocery store but rather for the public at large and commerce in general. The grocery store itself will only exist if demand dictates it. Also, I stand by my statement. The internet was invented by DOD, for the most part. The investment and development was made with public money. Industry picked that up and made the capital investments. Providing internet access is a lot closer to providing electricity then it will ever be to a free market model.