Jump to content

lou99/maximus1987

S4GRU Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,437

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    T-Mobile iPhone 4S
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Detroit-Ann Arbor
  • Here for...
    4G Information

Recent Profile Visitors

1,915 profile views

lou99/maximus1987's Achievements

Member Level: 4G WiMax

Member Level: 4G WiMax (10/12)

378

Reputation

  1. lou99/maximus1987
    It's a perpetual license, not 15 year like in Europe so it's basically impossible to overpay. If duo are willing to pay a certain price then softb should be Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. lou99/maximus1987
    Def faster than the sprint store telegraph & 12-mile: 0.1mbps on iPhone 6, note edge, etc Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. lou99/maximus1987
    Son stated buying TMO was plan A. I'm sure he would've bid for 20x20 of 600 had that gone through. But now he has to compete in a 4 carrier market and as you said, softb is a big company with lots of opportunities for investment; throwing more of softb's money into a 4 carrier free for all is probably the least profitable. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. lou99/maximus1987
    So you think softb will give sprint enough $ for a proper 10x10 no matter the reserve size? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. lou99/maximus1987
    http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/wireless-carriers-may-hesitate-partner-firstnet-analysts-say/2015-06-01 If sprint won't bid on 10x10 of 600 because softb would rather spend money on video games http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/06/01/us-softbank-supercell-idUSKBN0OH23H20150601 then is b14 a viable alternative? Beggars can't be choosers.
  6. lou99/maximus1987
    Tmo cleared 700a in NYC http://www.tmonews.com/2015/05/t-mobile-clear-to-launch-700mhz-band-12-lte-in-new-york-city/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. lou99/maximus1987
    Any sources for any of your assertions? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. lou99/maximus1987
    Thanks. This is why anything more than 1080p on a phone is ludicrous. The iPhone 6+, 5.5inch, is 1080p. I don't hear anyone complaining about its resolution. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. lou99/maximus1987
    Where did they say that? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. lou99/maximus1987
    For now. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. lou99/maximus1987
    That's cause sprint waited too long to do the overhaul and caused huge service disruptions. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. lou99/maximus1987
    More importantly, how big does a screen have to be before 1080p is insufficient? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. lou99/maximus1987
    There can be compatibility. But carriers can still throttle the video stream to 1080p. Problem solved. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. lou99/maximus1987
    1) carriers charge mvnos wholesale rates, not retail. The diff is that retail rate is higher to pay for advertising so if 'everyone' flees to mvnos, fine. Carriers still make money. 2) if (1) analysis is incorrect, carriers will just raise the rate they charge to mvnos. Simple. Mvnos are basically the carriers' bitches. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. lou99/maximus1987
    Correct. They care that it works. They don't care the engineering behind it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...