Jump to content

iansltx

S4GRU Staff Member
  • Content count

    1,260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

iansltx last won the day on July 20 2012

iansltx had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

830 Trusted

About iansltx

  • Rank
    S4GRU Contributing Author
  • Birthday 01/28/1991

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://yanntx.info

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    Essential PH-1
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    NW Austin
  • Here for...
    4G Information
  • Twitter Handle
    @iansltx

Recent Profile Visitors

8,819 profile views
  1. Welp, since the BYOD bit is a new customer promo only...again...guess I'll stay on my Business Fusion line. I'd totally pay the extra $5 + tax per month for an extra 12GB of tethering, which is also the only time I would use >1080p video anyway, and Hulu + Tidal, but guess Sprint still doesn't like their existing customer base, even though I haven't bought a phone from them since my S III in 2012.
  2. iansltx

    Xperia XZ2 Compact

    Looks like a nice phone, but while it has B26 and B41 it's missing B25?!? The omission is consistent across two places I checked. Hopefully it's just a misprint, given that it supports Sprint's other two bands. https://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=5720
  3. iansltx

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    I'm saying that, given that LTE can do so already, doing so with 5G should be a cakewalk.
  4. iansltx

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    Satellite is less outdated than you think. ViaSat has 100 Mbps plans, albeit with a 150 GB soft cap. 50 Mbps is available for a relatively reasonable price, depending on area. Of course, there's still the speed-of-light problem. With that said, 25/3 with a 160GB cap, particularly if it's a soft cap, for like $60/mo,, would be straightforward to sling via 2.5 GHz 5G, and if advertised at all would give Sprint probablh 80% market share in anywhere that can't get cable or fiber. The number of places that can hit those speeds over DSL that can't get cable or fiber is low enough that you don't really have to worry about those folks (basically only rural telephone companies/co-ops do that).
  5. iansltx

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    Guess I'll be going back to Pixel-land for my next phone: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/andy-rubin-s-phone-maker-essential-is-said-to-consider-sale
  6. iansltx

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    Feels kinda silly. This really reads like "Boost founder wants to buy back his company at a discount, which would conveniently happen if Sprint were forced to divest". What *would* be useful as a merger condition is a lock on all MVNO pricing, such that e.g. Ting could keep getting the deal they do right now on each of Sprint and T-Mo once the two merge, valid for, say, five years. Same with Google Fi.
  7. iansltx

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    It's not, though. They may not have as much rural 2.5/2.6 due to other small providers having EBS (or, to a smaller extent, BRS), but they have enough out west of here to run 3xCA B41.
  8. iansltx

    Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

    At the risk of mentioning something that's been brought up in the previous 46 pages, there's exactly one merger condition I care about...albeit a bit of a stretch: deploy B41 on any macro site that has mid-band LTE on it (AWS or PCS) and is in an area with >= 60 MHz of Sprint-owned BRS + EBS, and serve fixed wireless with the following specs over said network: 25/3 or better with a 160GB or higher cap and $10/50GB or better for overages, using equipment available with both indoor and outdoor variants Given how rich T-Mobile's backhaul network is, how much airlink capacity is available on B41 (particularly with massive MIMO and 5G), this is a softball requirement, and one that Charter is basically already investigating using CBRS and mmWave. I've probably said it before, but if you had to pick a band to dedicate to fixed wireless, BRS/EBS is ideal for that. Local wireless ISPs would kill for the spectrum Sprint uses for B41. Granted, without T-Mo's deep mid-band holdings, Sprint can't really afford to go fixed-only (or fixed-primary) on B41. With the combined portfolios, they absolutely can, given the sheer volume of PCS A-G alone (a few years back one of the staff here added up PCS spectrum availability between Sprint and T-Mobile). Not counting AWS. Not even touching low-band, where T-Mobile is well-positioned of late. Legere and Claure are talking a big game about wireless broadband with their merger announcement, particularly when mentioning cablecos as competitors. Fine; put your network where y'all's mouths are, because large swaths of the US could do with a second (or first) last-mile option that meets the FCC broadband definition without bouncing to a satellite and back. And yes, if I had to, I'd give up the B41 network around here, even though it's actually pretty widely available now and downright speedy (but so is T-Mobile's CA network...50M down and 30M up even when hairpinning through Seattle has me duly impressed).
  9. Going along US-79 between Austin and Longview is a nice test of Sprint's roaming ability. As I type this, I'm on EvDO roaming with VZW; if I had to guess, it's an old Alltel site. Earlier, I was on AT&T LTE (B4 or B17) with VZW or Sprint 1x. The T-Mobile SIM in my tablet is pulling native LTE pretty consistently, bouncing between various bands and CA. Unfortunately this is the last time I'll be doing this trip for quite awhile, so I won't be able to confirm when roaming goes live on that corridor. It'll also be interesting to see what happens in the reverse direction. Though realistically the only roaming available in the other direction for me will be on PCS A-F, assuming the network is set up to properly broadcast Band 2 when the frequencies line up. For high end phones that just so happen to have a single variant cross-carrier B26 should be a nice boost in those places where TMobile hasn't built out yet and Sprint has. EDIT: By the time I finished this message I was split between AT&T LTE and VZW 1x again.
  10. RT @dead_lugosi: Super excited @Twilio is partnering with @LonghornPHP to provide 💕✨Live Captioning✨💕 from @whitecoatcapxg for the Longhorn…

  11. Me, six hours ago: I'll send this email in an hour and a half. Me, just now: Oh. Right. Crap. Sending now.

  12. RT @k8em0: https://t.co/9gfsGPMGMR

  13. iansltx

    Essentially a sprint exclusive.

    Another 8.1 update came out yesterday. More modem fixes, BT 5.0, and some other stuff. Things do seem to be a bit better than I recall previously. Downtown you can hit either Sprint or Clearwire B41 and usually Clearwire is nigh useless anywhere near peak times, but tonight it was serviceable. I'll post another update the next time I'm in a CLWR-B41 area for an extended period, but it seems like Essential is finally actually getting stuff fixed (though upload speeds are still crap on B41 with lowish signals, rather than falling back to B25 or whatnot).
  14. Chinagate is real, y'all.

  15. Theory && analogy: When working colocated, communication can be UDP-ish because people will generally get what you'… https://t.co/0wbyDGeraL

×