Jump to content

userkv8031

S4GRU Member
  • Posts

    102
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    DuraMax
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Topeka
  • Here for...
    4G Information

userkv8031's Achievements

Member Level:  1x Advanced

Member Level: 1x Advanced (7/12)

17

Reputation

  1. Service was horrendous today in the Rushville area. From what I saw from a distance it looked like new equipment was being installed/hooked up. Calls were dropping and cutting out with decent signal. Since I don't have a 4G phone I can't say if it was turned on but I suspect they are close to turning this area up.
  2. In the last financial report USCC it was mentioned that they are exploring what can be done with those assets including selling them. It may have been an earlier report so if I am off a quarter sorry about that. Maybe USCC thought they could lease those towers to Sprint but that didn't pan out. Outside of the recently sold markets, I look for USCC to sell the rest of the network in the next year or two. The latest billing issues and reception problems after 4G upgrades are hastening the likelihood of a complete sale of USCC. The next question becomes who will buy them Verizon or Sprint. I would love to see Sprint buy the assets if they come up for sale as Sprint could use a boost in the rural areas of Illinois.
  3. I lived there for several years (2009-2012) and didn't realize Sprint had so many utility pole towers. I would guess the one by the mall is Sprint...always thought it to be a T-Mobile deal.
  4. Thank you for doing the analysis. I wish 800 was easier on the DuraMax. It takes a miracle for it to switch to 800. It generally prefers roaming on USCC over 800 on Sprint. Not sure why it does this unless it is the way the radio cycles as it will sometimes go from Sprint 1900 to USCC then a few seconds later to Sprint 800. Maybe I just have a flaky phone. I bought a DuraXT for the other line on my account and it seems to go for 800 almost right away then search for 1900. I noticed that when activating the phones they went straight to 800 and a few minutes later went to 1900. Activation on 800 apparently doesn't work for whatever reason. As long as the phones were connected to 800 activation wouldn't go through but once on 1900 it was done in a couple seconds.
  5. Yes, right now everyone that can connect is connecting to the only tower upgraded. Once a few more come up things will probably still be a bit slow as the same thing is going on. It will take nearly all of them to be live before things level off a bit as that was an iPCS market. iPCS markets are not known for having dense coverage.
  6. They are probably still going through testing and have not been officially accepted yet. It is also possible that Robert isn't getting steady stream of information from this area. On another note, I have had absolutely abysmal service today. I had more dropped calls today than i think I ever had in a day. This was around Jacksonville. US 67 between Jacksonville and Jerseyville is roaming so I can't say much for that stretch. I also couldn't connect to the Jerseyville tower even with Sprint only selected. Between Meridosia and Beardstown I was pulling the Beardstown II tower for about 20-30 miles on 800. It wasn't strong out that far but it was there. I even had a call connect but it was dropping every other word. I notice when I get below about 2 bars on 800 a lot of clipping starts to happen. Probably a combination of the distance and phone I have. Once all the towers in the area have 800 things should run much smoother. On the off chance that Sprint reads this...a tower between Beardstown and Meridosia would help greatly as would one on 67 south of Meridosia just beyond the 67/100 split at the top of the hill. Not ranting just hoping that someone with some pull in this market will find this. For what iPCS sold Sprint things aren't going all that bad.
  7. I guess I should look into getting a 4G phone. I have been patiently waiting for 4G to start appearing in central IL before upgrading. Now if I can just hold out for a tri-band device. Looks like that will only be a few more weeks. I haven't had an upgrade in years. Last I talked with the account manager he was going to give me an extra discount since I haven't taken advantage of my upgrade in a long time.
  8. You may wait and see what the upcoming tri-band phones offer and then compare. You should be fine waiting a few months as that will give Sprint a chance to turn more LTE towers on. During the transition the network can be a bit funky at times. I too was ready to buy the Note 3 but without tri-band it is off my list. Now I have to figure out what I want. It is time to get run away from my Duramax...I absolutely hate that phone. The V950 was so much better. Just wish Sprint had an updated version with 800. Kyocera phones are no replacement for what Motorola put out in the past. I think the iPhone 5 has LTE 800 but the Note 3 does not. 800 had to be cleared of iDEN and approved for LTE and CDMA use. Since iDEN was turned off at the end of June Samsung may not have envisioned LTE 800 rolling out too terribly fast. Now that all bands are being turned on simultaneously I think that was a bit shortsighted if that was the thought. There is no reason that all phones released now are not at the very least dual band. Next year they can do the tri-band but dual band could have been a stop gap. If the Note 3 was dual band I would still be considering it.
  9. Congrats on the wedding. I don't think there is much to report in Macomb as I haven't seen 800 there...yet.
  10. Sensorly is now showing a good splotch of purple in the Peoria area. Maybe this means that they will start rolling things out a bit faster across the market. Hopefully they will be well along before the first snow flies or it gets too cold/windy to work on the towers. At that point work will progress slowly and cause frustration among those tired of the slow speeds.
  11. It probably isn't integrated very well into the network yet. I drop calls when I go from the one NV tower in this area to the legacy equipment. Until all the towers here are upgraded I expect that to the new normal. In time the network will work better.
  12. It was poor wording on my part. If Sprint sweetens the pot enough they might get a good chunk of those that remain on USCC. The problem with Sprint is reputation in some of the areas. St. Louis used to be not so good on Sprint but back then there was no one that was great. Sprint still isn't great in Springfield. There are too many areas that have signal that is basically useless or doesn't work indoors. It is a tower density issue and that would be due to iPCS. They went for covering the main roads and just enough pops to meet obligations. They didn't care if they had usable service or service that sat at -110 dB which is unusable by any phone. I don't place much confidence in those maps as I know of a lot of areas painted blue that really have nothing from USCC. At least they are building towers at a pretty good pace in this area. VZW is also building towers at a good pace from Rushville over toward Quincy. I guess they are using 700 in that area. Sprint had a bunch of new towers in this area at one time but they were cancelled once iDEN conversion stopped. It would have been smart for Sprint to keep those four towers as they covered areas where Sprint roams. I expect Sprint to redeploy near those towers at some point in the future. I will find it a bit funny if they use the same iDEN towers when they do add service. Hopefully once Sprint deploys more of the NV gear in this small area service will improve a small bit. Seems they have been messing with things lately as service has been very erratic.
  13. That is correct...I think it was AJ that had a map showing the 1900 spectrum in MHz that Sprint owned across the US. I think it was posted long ago over at howardforums. If it was another user sorry on the mix up...not that I can even find the map now anyway. If I remember right, Sprint only had 10 MHz in some IL markets. I think this was well before the G-band was part of the holdings. Even so, that map should provide useful information in that it would show what can be devoted to 1x and EVDO I have GIS but for this exercise it wouldn't show anything useful. A better exercise would be finding detailed coverage maps for USCC (they don't exist beyond just coloring things blue) and overlaying those with Sprint coverage maps. There are a lot of areas that will go from having USCC signal to no or weak Sprint signal. The cities will mostly escape that but the more rural areas will be hit hard. Just have to hope that if USCC sells network assets that Sprint will buy them to quickly expand. I wish Sprint would buy the areas covered by SID 1914 and 221, network assets and customers. They need a big coverage boost across those two SIDs.
  14. I think most of that is due to the USCC network being shut down which means those users will automatically be moved to the Sprint network which is seeing NV work. USCC did not sell the network assets in those areas...yet. As of last quarter they were looking into selling those assets. I think USCC is looking to sell a few more markets. I hope Sprint picks them up instead of Verizon. Verizon would be most likely as USCC has some cellular licenses where Verizon holds none. The Quincy area is one place where Verizon offers no service. That extends east along US 24 almost to Rushville, IL. Statements from Sprint/Softbank does make it sound like they are exploring purchases of smaller carriers. I would have to guess USCC is on the list. On note of 1x800...I have not been able to connect to it lately. Instead I am stuck on roaming. They could be working on getting LTE up and running I guess as I usually have a fairly solid signal on 800.
×
×
  • Create New...