Jump to content

Verizon leasing 28 GHz and 39 GHz spectrum


kineticman

Recommended Posts

New FCC filing:  Verizon Wireless would lease from Nextlink spectrum associated with 93 LMDS (28 GHz) licenses and nine 39 GHz licenses in all or parts of 289 CMAs, covering approximately 63 percent of the U.S. population.

 

"5G" time?

 

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-16-838A1.pdf

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that VZW is coming out the gates too early with this technology. Similar to how Sprint did with WiMax. If I was VZW I would wait to see what the GSM carriers around the world does with their 5g tech.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28ghz is only 200mhz more than 2600mhz.

 

Sounds like they are trying to copy the success of sprints b41 and call it 5g.

 

we use lmds technology (amongst others, including wimax) to provide fixed wireless service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28ghz is only 200mhz more than 2600mhz.

 

Sounds like they are trying to copy the success of sprints b41 and call it 5g.

 

we use lmds technology (amongst others, including wimax) to provide fixed wireless service.

Math is off.

 

28 GHz is 28,000 MHz.

 

2600 MHz is 2.6GHz.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Math is off.

 

28 GHz is 28,000 MHz.

 

2600 MHz is 2.6GHz.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X

 

 

So then it could be 5g if it's 39ghz and 28ghz?? Or could this be for Comcast ?? And wifi? .... Just speculating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is definitely for 5G. Verizon has claimed huge success with fixed 5G performance, wants to use it to become a WISP. Part of their master plan to become everyone's cellular provider, ISP nationwide.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...