Jump to content

EV-DO Only Towers?


Recommended Posts

This may or may not be a stupid question, but is there such a thing as an EV-DO (eHRPD) only tower?  Yesterday I went driving around in southern Maryland where there are a number of towers that show up with no NV upgrades or with 3G-only NV.  Usually, when I pass towers like that, I get 1X and eHRPD, but on several (not all) that I saw yesterday, I had eHRPD really strong while sitting under them, but 1X was coming from an NV tower somewhere else. 

 

If it was just one, I would say it was an equipment issue at a given site, but this happened at four different sites, at least.  (Still going through my logs.)  Was it just a fluke, a coincidental issue with four towers at once, or are some towers actually only providing EV-DO?

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never seen an EVDO only site before. Any instance where I couldn't get 1x was related to an equipment/network error or an anomaly where the EVDO would propagate further than the 1x (because Tx power, etc.)

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never seen an EVDO only site before. Any instance where I couldn't get 1x was related to an equipment/network error or an anomaly where the EVDO would propagate further than the 1x (because Tx power, etc.)

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

Tons of 3G only sites here in Maui, Especially in the Wailuku area.. The cell density of 3G compared to LTE is amazing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never seen an EVDO only site before. Any instance where I couldn't get 1x was related to an equipment/network error or an anomaly where the EVDO would propagate further than the 1x (because Tx power, etc.)

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

 

See, that's what I thought too, which is why I'm so confused.  Looking at my log and comparing to what I remember from the drive on Saturday, the eHRPD was setting my phone on fire as I sat under the four towers, but 1X was weak and, evidently from my log, from very far away.  What are the statistical chances that four different non-LTE sites have the exact same problem at nearly the exact same time, but other surrounding sites work fine?

 

For example, one of the sites in question was a stealth site near a shopping center.  I remember eHRPD was at -70 dBm or so, and I made a site note in SCP that I was passing the shopping center.  But the BSL (and "strongest signal strength" field) in my log clearly indicates my 1X connection was from a site several miles away.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may or may not be a stupid question, but is there such a thing as an EV-DO (eHRPD) only tower?  Yesterday I went driving around in southern Maryland where there are a number of towers that show up with no NV upgrades or with 3G-only NV.  Usually, when I pass towers like that, I get 1X and eHRPD, but on several (not all) that I saw yesterday, I had eHRPD really strong while sitting under them, but 1X was coming from an NV tower somewhere else. 

 

If it was just one, I would say it was an equipment issue at a given site, but this happened at four different sites, at least.  (Still going through my logs.)  Was it just a fluke, a coincidental issue with four towers at once, or are some towers actually only providing EV-DO?

 

- Trip

 

Back when I had an SVLTE device (Photon Q), I remember that sometimes the phone would park on a different tower for 1x while placing its EVDO radio on a different tower, resulting in a weird configuration where EVDO was around -114 dBm and 1x was around -73 dBm. I have not experienced this yet on newer single antenna devices, but believe this may be related. 

 

While that case for the Photon Q, sometimes the the 1x radio was roaming on Verizon and EVDO radio was on Sprint native or both radios were native, I do recall my other single band devices (Note 5 and One Max) performing similarly. The phone would go into an area of poor 1x coverage, and inevitably connect to Verizon's 1x network. Once leaving the low coverage area, it would reconnect to Sprint's EVDO network, but remain connected to Verizon's 1x. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, that's what I thought too, which is why I'm so confused.  Looking at my log and comparing to what I remember from the drive on Saturday, the eHRPD was setting my phone on fire as I sat under the four towers, but 1X was weak and, evidently from my log, from very far away.  What are the statistical chances that four different non-LTE sites have the exact same problem at nearly the exact same time, but other surrounding sites work fine?

 

For example, one of the sites in question was a stealth site near a shopping center.  I remember eHRPD was at -70 dBm or so, and I made a site note in SCP that I was passing the shopping center.  But the BSL (and "strongest signal strength" field) in my log clearly indicates my 1X connection was from a site several miles away.

 

- Trip

 

I'm going to bet you're connected to 1x800 when this happens? It tends to have that side effect when it's sparsely deployed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, that's what I thought too, which is why I'm so confused.  Looking at my log and comparing to what I remember from the drive on Saturday, the eHRPD was setting my phone on fire as I sat under the four towers, but 1X was weak and, evidently from my log, from very far away.  What are the statistical chances that four different non-LTE sites have the exact same problem at nearly the exact same time, but other surrounding sites work fine?

 

For example, one of the sites in question was a stealth site near a shopping center.  I remember eHRPD was at -70 dBm or so, and I made a site note in SCP that I was passing the shopping center.  But the BSL (and "strongest signal strength" field) in my log clearly indicates my 1X connection was from a site several miles away.

 

- Trip

 

I see something like what you are describing when traveling between Kansas City and Springfield, although it's usually EVDO that is affect, not 1x. When crossing the market and NID boundary, my phone likes to hang on to the current NID for as long as possible, resulting in EVDO showing an almost non-existent signal from a tower miles away in the MO market, while 1x is connected to a tower basically overhead in the KS market. I used to see a similar effect on 1x as well, resulting in my phone hanging onto a weak signal from the MO market all while I've passed two towers in the KS market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...