Jump to content

Spark v. Spark Turbo


Recommended Posts

So I drove by the towers in question, the closest one (1.5 miles) to me was transmitting at Band 25 on my first drive by, and then on 26 the next time.  I am between the other 2 towers, the one south of me (2.3 miles) was transmitting at Band 41, and while I was near it I got Ping 63, 18.80dl/12.85ul, but about 3 blocks from my house it starts to drop off.  The one to my North (2.3 miles) was showing 3G and -92 but kept spinning on the bottom of the page with the word Connecting. I tried to close the phone app by "throwing away the phone card"(old Palm Pre habits die hard) but everytime I tried to run another test it just had a blank Field Test and Connecting on the bottom.  I ended up having to turn my phone off/on to get it to clear up. 

 

Is there a certain distance that band 41 starts fading?

 

Thanks,

 

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a certain distance that band 41 starts fading?

 

Thanks,

 

Tony

There isn't a specific distance that Band 41(or any radio frequency/technology) begins to fade. It varies by every site in every market. It depends on a plethora of environmental factors, site transmit power, down tilt, etc.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint updated their coverage map and it's now more realistic as far as Spark coverage. For example here in Tampa they took away roughly 60 percent of the Spark coverage shade yellow. It almost matches the WiMAX footprint to a t. I also noticed they did the same thing across the country. So the map would indicate Spark coverage only where band 41 is present.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint updated their coverage map and it's now more realistic as far as Spark coverage. For example here in Tampa they took away roughly 60 percent of the Spark coverage shade yellow. It almost matches the WiMAX footprint to a t. I also noticed they did the same thing across the country. So the map would indicate Spark coverage only where band 41 is present.

Nice. What about non spark lte?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint updated their coverage map and it's now more realistic as far as Spark coverage. For example here in Tampa they took away roughly 60 percent of the Spark coverage shade yellow. It almost matches the WiMAX footprint to a t. I also noticed they did the same thing across the country. So the map would indicate Spark coverage only where band 41 is present.

Wow...I am actually very impressed with the changes. Where it says fair and spark is there, I most often can get service outside, but not inside on b41. Where it is turbo or darker yellow, I have tested that I can get b41 inside of buildings and have much faster speeds. This map is much more accurate. Good on sprint

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...I am actually very impressed with the changes. Where it says fair and spark is there, I most often can get service outside, but not inside on b41. Where it is turbo or darker yellow, I have tested that I can get b41 inside of buildings and have much faster speeds. This map is much more accurate. Good on sprint

 

I don't agree with this.  On the map in some areas where it shows dark Spark turbo, my phone goes to 3G.  And this is outside.  I think their map it still a LITTLE overstated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with this.  On the map in some areas where it shows dark Spark turbo, my phone goes to 3G.  And this is outside.  I think their map it still a LITTLE overstated.

Well then I guess it depends on your area. Mine is pretty accurate. There are spots where I don't think I would have spark at all, but comparing the places I visit most and where I usually don't or do have spark, its accurate for me. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well then I guess it depends on your area. Mine is pretty accurate. There are spots where I don't think I would have spark at all, but comparing the places I visit most and where I usually don't or do have spark, its accurate for me. 

 

Cool.  Yeah, maybe it is based on area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint updated their coverage map and it's now more realistic as far as Spark coverage. For example here in Tampa they took away roughly 60 percent of the Spark coverage shade yellow. It almost matches the WiMAX footprint to a t. I also noticed they did the same thing across the country. So the map would indicate Spark coverage only where band 41 is present.

I will agree with that, Chicago market is now more true to what the coverage map should reflect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They also changed it in NYC to reflect coverage more accurately. It's great that they're making changes to the maps but it would be better in they just got a whole new map altogether.

I'll settle for just making the thing bigger! At least they have dynamic/smooth updating and scrolling.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. They really did revamp the "Spark" coverage. Much better reflection of the coverage pattern from each site. Not perfect, but it's hard to make a wireless coverage map that takes into consideration every single variable.

 

I don't agree with this.  On the map in some areas where it shows dark Spark turbo, my phone goes to 3G.  And this is outside.  I think their map it still a LITTLE overstated.

Maps don't take into account buildings, foliage, or other non-topographical obstructions. For Kansas City at least, the map is MUCH better than it was. Not perfect not, but better.

 

There are also areas on the map that don't have Spark coverage shaded which do have it like recently turned on 8t8r.

Nope, like it was with LTE, that will probably wait for some sort of launch or announcement before that coverage makes it onto the maps.

 

 

My area now shows no Spark at all even though I am parked on B41 now, park on it at home, and on most of my commute. 

 

- Trip

Same as above.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh I see. Did they increase the amount of zoom needed to see it? I feel like before you could be further out and see that distinction

I think they did.

 

 

Also, I've examined the map and now it appears that it is largely accurate for Charlotte if "Fair" LTE (Regular, non-Spark) means intermittent drops to 3G in a 400m-2mi radius from the center of the "Fair" spot depending on how bad it is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I see everything correct. The two ARFCN's you mentioned earlier and they idenitify as n-41.  using 4.832b SCP. Only using one TM SIM.
    • I posted this in the Nebraska Premier thread last week, but just wanted to share in this thread the progress that T-Mobile has made in filling in the great coverage gap known as Nebraska. Between late last year and this year, they have added 28 new expansion sites filling in the coverage hole, plus 11 Sprint site conversions in eastern Nebraska and far western Iowa. Notably, in the last month n41 coverage was added on over a dozen expansion sites in western Nebraska that were added to the network last year. For comparison, here is the very first map that I created in October of 2022 after we noted expansion sites outside of Sprint conversion in Lincoln and Omaha. It doesn't show any western parts of the state, but just know there was nothing besides roaming coverage and a little B12 coverage leaking down from South Dakota to the west of Valentine, NE.
    • Sent a copy of my DB in an e-mail just now.  Couldn't leave the house today but can hopefully get a screenshot when I'm out on another cell site tomorrow.
    • 76MB Google Play System update after that, bringing the date up to 3/1 from prior 2/1 date. 
    • April security patch is already out - 738.30 MB download. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...