Jump to content

600 MHz auction results posted and transition schedule


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

Sprint already has low band spectrum. Additional low band spectrum would be just raw material -- it would not build its own new sites. A 5 MHz FDD chunk of 600 MHz would not bring "results."

 

AJ

Maybe a 10 MHz FDD chunk?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe a 10 MHz FDD chunk?

 

Took the words right out of my mouth. The reason that Sprint is doing all this small cell for coverage thing is that they are broke. That has been their problem for at least 10 years now. Otherwise they'd be doing it the same way as everybody else. And they would have rebanded the 800MHz spectrum like 7 years ago.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took the words right out of my mouth. The reason that Sprint is doing all this small cell for coverage thing is that they are broke. That has been their problem for at least 10 years now. Otherwise they'd be doing it the same way as everybody else. And they would have rebanded the 800MHz spectrum like 7 years ago.

To be fair, 800 would not have cleared much faster even if Sprint had money. Sprint is just waiting for other entities to rebrand and those entities are taking their time. But if Sprint had 10 MHz lowland FDD, they would be on equal footing with AT&T and VZW in most places (until they start their B5 deployments that is), and we would see B26 tuned for coverage not capacity is many more places.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, 800 would not have cleared much faster even if Sprint had money. Sprint is just waiting for other entities to rebrand and those entities are taking their time. But if Sprint had 10 MHz lowland FDD, they would be on equal footing with AT&T and VZW in most places (until they start their B5 deployments that is), and we would see B26 tuned for coverage not capacity is many more places.

 

Amazing thing happens when you have money. You can speed up the process by making some political contributions to certain people. Or donate a few SUVs for the sheriff and his lieutenants to drive on the job.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The low bids for 600mhz may be directly related to the difficulties Sprint has had in rebranding 800 and the minimal help the FCC has provided.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint was bidding, it would just drive up cost.  Rather them spend the 2, 3, 5 billion on making a really nice dense 2.5GHz network.  It is possible, and the faster Sprint can drive home with 2.5GHz, the faster they become kings in the city.  They will be untouchable. 

 

Rural markets will be fine with ESMR/PCS, even where it is just 5x5 + 5x5. But those will be few as time goes on and they can toss up 2.5GHz to take some load off a tower if/when needed. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The low bids for 600mhz may be directly related to the difficulties Sprint has had in rebranding 800 and the minimal help the FCC has provided.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

 

Pls explain ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pls explain ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Winners of the 600mhz auction will need to wait for TV stations to vacate the 600mhz band. Sprint has had to do the same thing with their SMR spectrum (Sprint has had to wait on PS to vacate the 800mhz band). SMR rebanding started YEARS ago and it is still not finished. 600mhz bidders don't want to deal with the same problems Sprint has had to deal with and thus 600mhz spectrum is valued low.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pls explain ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

To expand on RAvirani's comment above, The FCC has almost automatically granted extension after extension to various holdouts even though Sprint was paying for new radio systems.   For businesses,  time is money.  Sprint has lost opportunities to better serve its customers, the general public.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Broadcasters have a much better incentive.  Congress has mandated the FCC can only reimburse for three years.  Beyond that, broadcasters are on their own for any costs they incur.  Any extension will have to come from Congress itself, which is certainly possible, but much more likely to come with some kind of accountability.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Winners of the 600mhz auction will need to wait for TV stations to vacate the 600mhz band. Sprint has had to do the same thing with their SMR spectrum (Sprint has had to wait on PS to vacate the 800mhz band). SMR rebanding started YEARS ago and it is still not finished. 600mhz bidders don't want to deal with the same problems Sprint has had to deal with and thus 600mhz spectrum is valued low.

 

I would argue that PS is WAYYYYY more important than broadcasters having to relocated to another location. You can't disrupt PS at all for safety reasons so that is why it is taking so long.  I understand that TV broadcasters have to get compatible equipment for their TV station but that equipment already exists in the market.  

 

In this case TV broadcasters have an incentive to relocate because until they relocate they don't get their money.  I don't anticipate an 8-10 year time frame for the TV broadcasters to relocate unlike SMR which also affects other countries since they was collaboration for frequency alignment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, broadcasters left 700MHz just fine, other than 700A which wasn't utilized but by USCC until TMobile started buying it up.  All those broadcasters on 700A promptly vacated as TMobile make purchases.  Don't think 600MHz will have any more issue than 700MHz did which seems to be minor.

 

Sprint has had issue with 800MHz because it is related to public safety (gives strong excuses for holdouts) and having to deal with other countries who do whatever the f they want. Totally different animal. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It hasn't finished yet and I'm pretty sure that article is just wrong.  The auction doesn't need almost $40 billion to finish and of course the TV station rep isn't happy that the stations will be getting less than the $86.4 billion finish would have brought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It hasn't finished yet and I'm pretty sure that article is just wrong.  The auction doesn't need almost $40 billion to finish and of course the TV station rep isn't happy that the stations will be getting less than the $86.4 billion finish would have brought.

It was referring to the previous round's requirement. This article does however list Sprint as a spectrum player in the auction which goes against all of the public statements of them not participating

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Auction is over, that was the 4th and final round. It has been a flop, eversince the 5g plans have come around, people have put aside getting 600mhz and if they bought it at all was going to do at a minimum. Pay exorbitant prices for very little spectrum, or save money and go for high and in the millimeter wave bands.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fb46de5fffa865ba37a9e6a7effa9852.jpg

 

Not as wide coverage as you might think it is.

 

https://www.arcgis.com/home/viewer.html?webmap=2a4febee66894bfd99d682a48eaddead

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Does this map mean those are the only areas where 600mhz is being auctioned off for? I thought this was going to be a nationwide spectrum auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm horribly confused about what everyone is going on about here.  The 70 MHz sold is nationwide (split into PEAs for sale) and the bidding is on-going.  All that is known is that the auction will now close at this stage; the final forward auction price has yet to be determined.

 

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fb46de5fffa865ba37a9e6a7effa9852.jpg

 

Not as wide coverage as you might think it is.

 

https://www.arcgis.com/home/viewer.html?webmap=2a4febee66894bfd99d682a48eaddead

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

This is not a representation of the state of the spectrum auction; This is a demonstration application for ArcGIS's auction management products targeted at the bidders. Read more here

 

http://www.esri.com/esri-news/arcuser/spring-2016/bidders-can-see-opportunities-in-spectrum-auction-with-arcgis

 

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was able to install the March 1 Android security patch. Seems slightly more accurate with 5g ca band id, but can not swear by it. Updated google play system update through the software information screen to March 1. *#73# still works. Froze updates waiting on SCP update beta to fix n41 showing as n38.
    • Just installed it. Thanks for the info.  71 mb mar 1st date.
    • There's a permit for a new 47 story building at 205 Montague St in Downtown Brooklyn. The problem is that  T-Mobile eNB 48352 is on the building next door and this new building will block two out of 3 sectors of the site. For reference, the new building will be roughly as tall as 16 Court St which is right across the street. This site is the primary site covering Cadman Plaza so I wonder what the plan is. Will they just try to change sector placement, move to a different building, or will this just speed up the conversion of the Sprint site at 25 Monroe Place?
    • At least not recently.  I think I might have seen this a year ago.  Not Sure.
    • Did they previously hop between n38 and n41 in prior version of SCP, or have you always seen n41 displayed properly?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...