marioc21 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 I'll grant you the article is mostly about Verizon, but if you read far enough down you'll see the brief mention of Sprint looking into the same thing. Not really a lot of details but interesting none the less. I suppose this means Sprint and VZ both get tired of having to rely on contractors for cell site bandwidth? http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/verizon-wireless-dark-fiber-backhaul-quest-poses-opportunities-challenges-w/2014-10-07 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickel Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Interesting, I wonder how serious Sprint is about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnwk Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 Remember, both of Sprint and Verizon has Internet services as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Posted October 8, 2014 Share Posted October 8, 2014 As far as I can tell, what wireless company wouldn't want dark fiber? Controlled costs are something every business would want, and the reliable throughput of having a dedicated connection would be preferred to the current 'managed solutions' that these companies are offering. Especially if sprint is going to keep unlimited data and reverse the subscriber losses, they will need a better solution especially in the high traffic areas. I know that these firms are reluctant to bypass their future revenue stream for a one time payment, but it is defiantly the best for the wireless operators. The point I found most intriguing was that one of the ILEC's said: "I struggle because if we don't do it, somebody is going to do it" which I take to mean that competition will heat up and drive prices down even if dark fiber is still not widely used. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraydog Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 I wish SoftBank would double down and buy out Level 3, then look at buying out other AAV vendors. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasta Cheesehead Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 (edited) Dark fiber acquisition for Sprint has two purposes they will use it for tower backhaul and expanding their metro Ethernet business. They have been at it for a while, fierce is somewhat late. Its part of network vision Edited October 9, 2014 by Rasta Cheesehead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amcferrin90 Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 I wish SoftBank would double down and buy out Level 3, then look at buying out other AAV vendors. Let's not and say we did. I've seen enough of Softbank. Softbank and Sprint were a good match. Very similar in planning and implementation from my viewpoint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickel Posted December 2, 2014 Share Posted December 2, 2014 I wish SoftBank would double down and buy out Level 3, then look at buying out other AAV vendors. Wouldn't that take a lot of time and money to integrate their stuff with Sprint's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 4, 2014 Share Posted December 4, 2014 Wouldn't that take a lot of time and money to integrate their stuff with Sprint's? At some point or another, depending on what Dish does with its spectrum, they will have to buy/build local fiber loops to accommodate bandwidth needs. While Sprint is in the process of upgrading their internet backbone to 400G, they have no metro fiber loops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericdabbs Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 Sprint needs to do this if they want a chance to catch up with the other carriers. Sprint can't be relying on subs in the future for fiber backhaul installation when they have shown thus far that they are unreliable and behind schedule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickel Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 At some point or another, depending on what Dish does with its spectrum, they will have to buy/build local fiber loops to accommodate bandwidth needs. While Sprint is in the process of upgrading their internet backbone to 400G, they have no metro fiber loops. I don't understand, why would they have to own local fiber loops? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuckinNutz Posted December 5, 2014 Share Posted December 5, 2014 I was with some Comcast contractors yesterday, they were running fiber to towers in Frederick County MD for TMobile and Sprint, 1 on Mar Lu Ridge Rd, 1 along RT15 at Devilbiss Rd at central tractor supply as well as some other locations in the county....so yeah, a fiber backbone going on here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.