Jump to content

Moto X 2014 (was "Motorola IHDT56QA1")


NateC

Recommended Posts

This is definitely the Moto X (2014) and AT&T + Verizon Models.

 

Dimensions (soft feel model) 72.4 (width) x 140.8 (height) x 3.8-9.9 (thickness)

 

XT1095 / XT1097 (AT&T) GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz) 4G LTE (02, 03, 04, 05, 07, 17, 29) 

 

XT1096 (Verizon) GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); CDMA (850, 1900 MHz); 4G LTE (02, 03, 04, 07, 13)

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/moto-x-specs-2014

Edited by atomic50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moto x with the leather back is nice. Too bad ATT and Verizon have the exclusive on moto maker. Hope it isn't too long. Moto could be a nice mini to my max device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:

 

GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz);

UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz);

CDMA (850/1900 MHz);

4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41)

 

It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

 

Wait...  So this includes USCC's main band, B12?  Very nice if the rumored USCC LTE roaming deal comes along pretty soon!  :tu:

 

Also Motorola typically (at least in my past experiences) puts out devices with above average RF performance.  Hopefully this will be the same.  Depending on what else comes out this month or next, I may need to give this device some serious consideration.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:

 

4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41)

 

It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

 

Wait...  So this includes USCC's main band, B12?  Very nice if the rumored USCC LTE roaming deal comes along pretty soon!  :tu:

 

Also Motorola typically (at least in my past experiences) puts out devices with above average RF performance.  Hopefully this will be the same.  Depending on what else comes out this month or next, I may need to give this device some serious consideration.

 

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

4 8 15 16 23 42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

 

I know around here B12 is USCC's main LTE band, but they refarmed their 850 spectrum to also add on B5 for the iPhone.  In my particular county, USCC has a 10x10 chunk in B12 (700a and b - USCC is probably the sole reason why there isn't any native AT&T coverage since they grabbed 700b and the cellular A license), but only a 5x5 chunk for LTE in B5.  Either way, good news!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is anybody else amazed at the quick charge? I had no idea this type of charging existed, or will. How does this not degrade the battery quicker... I need an adult...or a battery expert.

Really sounds amazing. But wondering what the catch is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me. More concerned with battery. But the fast charge aspect is nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me.

 

Charge slowly, and carry a big stick.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me. More concerned with battery. But the fast charge aspect is nice.

If Android L is actually 35+ pct more efficient battery then I don't know that the battery will be an issue.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Android L is actually 35+ pct more efficient battery then I don't know that the battery will be an issue.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

I know this, but why not just pack a larger battery like the rest of the competition? Imagine Android L with a 3000 mAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this, but why not just pack a larger battery like the rest of the competition? Imagine Android L with a 3000 mAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

I agree. Does the S5 have that size. I thought it was 2500 mAh?

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...