nexgencpu Posted December 29, 2016 Share Posted December 29, 2016 Permitting is a local issue, not national. Sprint has shown support for net neutrality, so I doubt they're lobbying to get rid of it. FCC did affect local permitting, and that's one reason Mobilitie feels as empowered as they are, deploying in non-zoned and government locations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tybo31316 Posted December 29, 2016 Share Posted December 29, 2016 Maybe Sprint wants to get the contract for First Net. So they can have access to the government slice of 700mhz spectrum so that they can expand their foot print. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamMrFamous07 Posted December 29, 2016 Share Posted December 29, 2016 Too much speculation going on here, let's just take things day by day lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jones Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Hard to not speculate when you trumpet such a big decision alongside the newly president elect. Something is brewing. Renewed merger push in the next 2 years... Before midterm elections Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tengen31 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Maybe Sprint wants to get the contract for First Net. So they can have access to the government slice of 700mhz spectrum so that they can expand their foot print.How likely is that? Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 How about permitting or net neutrality etc, mergers aren't the only thing big telcos are concerned with. Permitting is a local issue, Trump has nothing to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 How likely is that? Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk They did not apply. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Maybe Sprint wants to get the contract for First Net. So they can have access to the government slice of 700mhz spectrum so that they can expand their foot print. They did not apply. AT&T is one of the finalists and the most likely winner. Verizon is the other. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 (edited) Too much speculation going on here, let's just take things day by day lol That's why we have forums so we can speculate. Otherwise these forums would be boring! If we can't speculate and bash Sprint what is this site good for? Edited December 30, 2016 by bigsnake49 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flompholph Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Permitting is a local issue, Trump has nothing to do with it. One thing he could do is shorten the "Shot Clock" to force an answer faster. Claim technology has increased so that they can review things faster and cut the time in half. That is more probable than any merger of the big 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericdabbs Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 That's the problem here, there are some that keep speculating merger when it isn't in the picture. The business environment is about to change where even a 2 percent drop in the corporate tax rate would spur on hiring. Changes in the tax code and killing Obamacare aka affordable Care like there's a OXY moron of I ever seen it could get repealed and save companies money in which they could hire. Spend more on company infrastructure. Improve the network greatly. There is no merger happening for at least a couple of years. The merger people are the same ones that are saying 600 MHz will be a panacea and that's turning out to be a crook. Get your heads away from mergers, you will only disappoint yourself again. Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk Totally agree with u 100%. All this speculation about a merger just because we think trump "owes us one" is nonsense just because 5k jobs were brought back. I think if it was this easy to get a favor, I am damn sure VZ, ATT and Tmo will follow suit. Mergers are a very big deal and need to be considered wisely. There are no takebacks if things go south post merger. Do we really think a merger is in the best interest for all of us? Who would run the new SprinTmo company and the rest of the leadership team? Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Totally agree with u 100%. All this speculation about a merger just because we think trump "owes us one" is nonsense just because 5k jobs were brought back. I think if it was this easy to get a favor, I am damn sure VZ, ATT and Tmo will follow suit. Mergers are a very big deal and need to be considered wisely. There are no takebacks if things go south post merger. Do we really think a merger is in the best interest for all of us? Who would run the new SprinTmo company and the rest of the leadership team? Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk The T-Mobile team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericdabbs Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 The T-Mobile team.You think Masa is really going to dump the entire sprint leadership team for tmobiles leadership? If u are marcelo or any of the sprint leadership team, why would u want this? I agree with u that it should be the tmobile leadership team that runs sprintmo. Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
808Bill Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 You think Masa is really going to dump the entire sprint leadership team for tmobiles leadership? If u are marcelo or any of the sprint leadership team, why would u want this? I agree with u that it should be the tmobile leadership team that runs sprintmo. Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk Two words. Golden Parachutes. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JossMan Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 No politician truly "cares" about the merger, it's just what benefits them the most. Hillary could care less as long as son put a nice chunk of $$$ somewhere she could eventually get to. Same with Trump... Like the Clinton Foundation sorry I couldn't help myself. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trip Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Permitting is a local issue, Trump has nothing to do with it. I forget if it was last year or this year, but the FCC passed a rule requiring localities to approve permitting requests within x number of days of filing unless they can provide a good reason not to (RF safety is not one of the "good reasons" as long as it complies with FCC rules). If no approval is provided, it is deemed granted. As noted elsewhere, that rule could be modified further. - Trip 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 I forget if it was last year or this year, but the FCC passed a rule requiring localities to approve permitting requests within x number of days of filing unless they can provide a good reason not to (RF safety is not one of the "good reasons" as long as it complies with FCC rules). If no approval is provided, it is deemed granted. As noted elsewhere, that rule could be modified further. - Trip Tell that to San Fran, Berkeley and every high priced suburb in the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trip Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Tell that to San Fran, Berkeley and every high priced suburb in the US. I'm sure they're aware. - Trip 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 (edited) I'm sure they're aware. - Trip They seem to flaunt those rules and dare you to take them to court. Edited December 30, 2016 by bigsnake49 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flompholph Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 I'm sure they're aware. - Trip They seem to flaunt those rules and dare you to take them to court. And how many where blocked in courts? 1 Maybe. You can't stop a tower because of health reasons and you have to grant new technologies access both are federal laws. The only way to block a site is the way it looks with small cells now you can't even block them for that reason. The only thing locals can do is limit height and some placement rules. The federal government could pass a law like Ohio just did and limit locals on placement rules then all they have is height limit rules. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamMrFamous07 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 That's why we have forums so we can speculate. Otherwise these forums would be boring! If we can't speculate and bash Sprint what is this site good for? I know! LOL. I'm just going to things day by day so I don't get my hopes up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Let's keep from getting overtly political with this. Of course, a political discussion is allowed when it is specific to Sprint and telecommunications policy, etc. However, please keep it from getting partisan or vitriolic. And it is OK to speculate on subjects. Just make sure to use some rational explanation to back it up why you believe it could happen. Otherwise you open yourself to a lot of critical analysis. Continue... Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSpark Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 That's exactly what I was getting at.However, there's no way to know if the same announcement would have happened had there been a different election result. Sprint would probably try to work with any administration to make its business more competitive. Of course, the question is how much of Sprint's outreach is reciprocated by the administration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony.spina97 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 If we can't speculate and bash Sprint what is this site good for? News, updates, and general information about Sprint and the cellular technology world. -Anthony 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laqn1283 Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 Quick question: When I look at OpenSignal Sprint's 3g/lte map, its coverage map is about 20% more extensive than Tmobile's 3g/lte map. But upon removal 3g from the map, Sprint's lte coverage is slightly less than tmobile's. Is it fair to say that many Sprint's towers are still 3g and not yet converted to lte? If that is true, what are the reasons for not having these sites converted to lte? lack of backhaul, equipments? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.