Jump to content

My rambling's and things I find...


mhammett

Recommended Posts

I was filling out a survey on my local newspaper's web site to read more of the article. This one was about technology adoption\decision maker\cellular\etc.  I was presented to choose between two different plans. It looks like a cell company is doing some market research as to different plans to offer.

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ks7n09tr8s4b3v0/flex%20plan.png?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/f17kh8slxbj46vb/limitless.png?dl=0

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would definitely be interested in the $50 unlimited + $10/gig tethering.

 

edit: actually I thought it was $10 per 10 gig tether, so uh no.

 

I would be interested in any tethering that comes to about $1-5 per gig.

 

I am paying clear $55 for unlimited wimax, which I use anywhere from 10 to 40 gig a month, which means I am paying anywhere from ~$5.5 per gig, to $1.3 per gig.

 

$10/gig is still way too high.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm so over Samsung. Ironically typed from Samsung tablet.

 

From Samsung to Robert goes out this long distance dedication...

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

https://www.facebook.com/groups/towerclimbers/permalink/10152889298709105/

 

 

Does anyone know what they're talking about? 65 MHz upgrade? Replacing 1900 LTE?

 

its in Ericsson markets, i don't know the exact specifics, but basically removing the old 1900 RRUs and replacing them with a new combined 1900 RRU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where does the 65 megahertz name come from? Did Ericsson have an RRU for each technology? Being in a Samsung market, I never followed Ericsson and all that much.

 

See: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/6180-how-to-spot-sprint-antennas-and-rrus-ericsson/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...