ingenium Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 Hey guys I thought I'd just share something that I observed with the latest iOS beta - I think Sprint has managed to implement some form of SIB13 in their network where the network instructs the device when to hand over to the CDMA network. Before this beta, when I would drop LTE, I would momentarily drop data before my phone picked up 1x and then switched to 3G. If I were running a speed test while I dropped LTE, it would fail. As of yesterday, when my phone drops LTE, it goes straight to 3G, without ever dropping the data connection or connecting to 1x. I ran a speedtest in a low signal area (-118 B25) and blocked the signal to the phone with my hands about 5 seconds through the test. The phone handed down to 3G and the data session was not interrupted - the speedtest continued. Im not sure but I think that this is probably in preparation for VoLTE. Thoughts anyone?It's always done that on Android I believe. Sent from my Nexus 6P 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbastard Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 It's always done that on Android I believe. Sent from my Nexus 6P Yes it has, but not entirely smooth handoffs. Last year, you could lose LTE and go to 3G immediately but unfortunately any media streams or videos would get timed out. Fortunately early this year, Sprint managed to fix that. LTE to eHRPD hand offs (and eHRPD to LTE) are all smooth now. I can have a video chat or a live stream and not get timed out if I move from one technology to another. Also, going back to LTE from 3G happens automatically now, even if you have active data sessions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted August 18, 2016 Share Posted August 18, 2016 So not a sign of SIB13 on Sprint's network? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xlegendxero Posted August 23, 2016 Share Posted August 23, 2016 Also, going back to LTE from 3G happens automatically now, even if you have active data sessions. Well this is good to hear. I am thinking of returning to Sprint. according to a sales rep (since they are to always be trusted), supposedly Sprint's phones no longer have that huge 30 minute delay for trying to reconnect to LTE; Effectively negating the need to toggle airplane mode. I know what you said doesn't answer my inquiry and likely does not correlate to it, but seeing that the phones can switch from EVDO to LTE during an active data session, makes me hopeful that the rescan interval has also been improved. Also I have been out of the loop on Sprint stuff for almost two years. need to learn more about how reliable LTE connectivity has become with improvements and availability of band 41; unfortunately it seems that the South Bay market threads are dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingenium Posted August 23, 2016 Share Posted August 23, 2016 Well this is good to hear. I am thinking of returning to Sprint. according to a sales rep (since they are to always be trusted), supposedly Sprint's phones no longer have that huge 30 minute delay for trying to reconnect to LTE; Effectively negating the need to toggle airplane mode. I know what you said doesn't answer my inquiry and likely does not correlate to it, but seeing that the phones can switch from EVDO to LTE during an active data session, makes me hopeful that the rescan interval has also been improved. Also I have been out of the loop on Sprint stuff for almost two years. need to learn more about how reliable LTE connectivity has become with improvements and availability of band 41; unfortunately it seems that the South Bay market threads are dead. South bay can be approximated from the SF market thread most likely. You can generally assume similar rates of progress and coverage. I don't track the South Bay since I never go down there and haven't really had anyone contribute data from it. Sent from my Nexus 6P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbastard Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Well this is good to hear. I am thinking of returning to Sprint. according to a sales rep (since they are to always be trusted), supposedly Sprint's phones no longer have that huge 30 minute delay for trying to reconnect to LTE; Effectively negating the need to toggle airplane mode. I know what you said doesn't answer my inquiry and likely does not correlate to it, but seeing that the phones can switch from EVDO to LTE during an active data session, makes me hopeful that the rescan interval has also been improved. Also I have been out of the loop on Sprint stuff for almost two years. need to learn more about how reliable LTE connectivity has become with improvements and availability of band 41; unfortunately it seems that the South Bay market threads are dead. Keep in mind that network quality varies by market. I've seen 3G (eHRPD) to LTE handoff in the East Texas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio markets. This may not be the case in the Bay Area. For example, some people claim B41 is very reliable. But here in Texas, B41 is pretty useless for the most part. B41 acts like a glorified wifi hotspot when it comes to coverage and it can't penetrate a wall once you get past 1,000 feet away from the cell tower. Tall trees with heavy foliage can kill B41 extremely fast as well. The network still has a long way to go. I personally don't recommend Sprint in my area to friends. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueAngel Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Keep in mind that network quality varies by market. I've seen 3G (eHRPD) to LTE handoff in the East Texas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio markets. This may not be the case in the Bay Area. For example, some people claim B41 is very reliable. But here in Texas, B41 is pretty useless for the most part. B41 acts like a glorified wifi hotspot when it comes to coverage and it can't penetrate a wall once you get past 1,000 feet away from the cell tower. Tall trees with heavy foliage can kill B41 extremely fast as well. The network still has a long way to go. I personally don't recommend Sprint in my area to friends. In Philly right when NV started happening I had barely usable voice and data at my house, now I carry B41 all throughout my house. I rarely see B25, B26 here and there when B41 won't reach but generally I am on B41 95% of the time. It's an amazing difference from a few years ago, Sprint has come a long way, but unfortunately they still need a lot of work in a lot of areas. Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Hey guys found something really cool - FIVE (PROBABLY SIX) BAND 41 CARRIERS ARE LIVE HERE FROM THE SAME SITE IN DOWNTOWN SEATTLE! EARFCNS are: 39874, 40072, 40978, 41176, 41374. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 Hey guys found something really cool - FIVE (PROBABLY SIX) BAND 41 CARRIERS ARE LIVE HERE FROM THE SAME SITE IN DOWNTOWN SEATTLE! EARFCNS are: 39874, 40072, 40978, 41176, 41374.Holy sh#t screen shots please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flompholph Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 What are the GCI's? Is it a new pattern or new sectors? Neat stuff if real. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 What are the GCI's? Is it a new pattern or new sectors? Neat stuff if real. They seem to differ by 8 in decimal (iPhone doesn't report GCIs in hex). I will grab some screenshots later although I am trying to enjoy the hawks game ???? - that's where I am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 What are the GCI's? Is it a new pattern or new sectors? Neat stuff if real. There might be a jump between the lower set of 2 (maybe 3) carriers (the set including 39874 and 40072) and the higher set (40978, 41176 and 41374) athough my phone is camped out on 40978/41176 right now so I can't really check. I have verified that all 5 carriers are coming from the same sector though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flompholph Posted November 8, 2016 Share Posted November 8, 2016 As long as they are within 256 they should be coming from the same site but if you post the screenshots latter I can do the math to find the GCIs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmachine Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Sprint is promoting the launch of LTE Plus in the LA Metro market. I received an email from them this morning announcing "a faster, better network experience." I personally have not noticed a difference. Of course I don't have a 3xCA capable phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Sprint is promoting the launch of LTE Plus in the LA Metro market. I received an email from them this morning announcing "a faster, better network experience." I personally have not noticed a difference. Of course I don't have a 3xCA capable phone. I think this is in tandem with the new HTC Bolt, which seems to be the only device certified to run 3xCA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danlodish345 Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 I think this is in tandem with the new HTC Bolt, which seems to be the only device certified to run 3xCA. cant the samsung s7 do 3x ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 cant the samsung s7 do 3x ca None of the current devices have it enabled. All require some sort of update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anthony.spina97 Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 The jury is also still out on whether the iPhone 7's have 3xCA enabled in the software or not. -Anthony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 The jury is also still out on whether the iPhone 7's have 3xCA enabled in the software or not. -Anthony Same goes for Pixel, No mention anywhere either. Maybe Sprint is blocking them from accessing 3XCA from their end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttwiitch Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Same goes for Pixel, No mention anywhere either. Maybe Sprint is blocking them from accessing 3XCA from their end.Actually, Sprint news room said it's currently 2xCA and via a future update it will be 3xCA. Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nexgencpu Posted November 11, 2016 Share Posted November 11, 2016 Actually, Sprint news room said it's currently 2xCA and via a future update it will be 3xCA. Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk For Pixel? Well there you go.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 As long as they are within 256 they should be coming from the same site but if you post the screenshots latter I can do the math to find the GCIs. Hey just realized I forgot to post screenshots after the game. Here they are. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazy_vag Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Just thinking outloud, but why does would Sprint keep adding only 20MHz carriers. In tech industry, you need to change things in order of magnitude, so while we start with 1 20MHz B41. Adding second carrier doubled the bandwidth. 3rd carrier only increased it by 50% (and even less when you factor in B26 and 2xB25). So my question is this. Why isn't the third B41 carrier 40MHz? Why have 6 B41 carriers each 20 Mhz instead of fewer 40 MHz or 60MHz carriers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flompholph Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 0B746801 0B69E53A 0B69E532 0B746804 It looks like like a mini micro and an 8t8r the mini micro is probably used as the DAS they normally replace clearwire sites. They probably are using 6 carriers just so the 8t8r goes a little farther without interference. With such a low GCI for the 8t8r the site number is most likely very early. Some one would have to create a spreadsheet to be sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilotimz Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Just thinking outloud, but why does would Sprint keep adding only 20MHz carriers. In tech industry, you need to change things in order of magnitude, so while we start with 1 20MHz B41. Adding second carrier doubled the bandwidth. 3rd carrier only increased it by 50% (and even less when you factor in B26 and 2xB25). So my question is this. Why isn't the third B41 carrier 40MHz? Why have 6 B41 carriers each 20 Mhz instead of fewer 40 MHz or 60MHz carriers? Just a guess but maybe we have something called standards that say a LTE carrier is limited to bandwidths of 1.4/3/5/10/15/20 MHz each. :wink wink: Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.