Inherent advantages of LTE?
#1
Posted 20 May 2012 - 09:16 PM
How robust is the signal propagation of LTE at 1900mhz compared to that of CDMA at 1900mhz?
Also, how different will LTE-TDD be from WiMax at 2500mhz in terms of signal propagation and throughput/consistency of service/hand-offs/etc?
Once again, sorry if this has all been answered before, but I appreciate any insight all of you experts can provide!
Thomas
#2
Posted 21 May 2012 - 02:45 AM
#3
Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:52 AM
LTE and CDMA on 1900Mhz should have the same propagation characteristics after network vision so if you get 3G & Voice you'll get LTE. LTE is better with lower signal from what I've seen you can get speeds of 20mbit/s at signal levels of -106dBm vs CDMA which drops down to 0.05mbit/s or less at -106 dBm. WiMax is a broadband technology, it's not meant for Voice, SMS, or MMS.
I thought Sprint got SMS/MMS working over WiMax
#4
Posted 21 May 2012 - 05:50 PM
I thought Sprint got SMS/MMS working over WiMax
Nope.
#5
Posted 22 May 2012 - 04:45 AM
#6
Posted 22 May 2012 - 05:57 AM
LTE and CDMA on 1900Mhz should have the same propagation characteristics after network vision so if you get 3G & Voice you'll get LTE. LTE is better with lower signal from what I've seen you can get speeds of 20mbit/s at signal levels of -106dBm vs CDMA which drops down to 0.05mbit/s or less at -106 dBm. WiMax is a broadband technology, it's not meant for Voice, SMS, or MMS.
Clearwire would argue otherwise - they do voice over wimax now.
#7
Posted 22 May 2012 - 05:59 AM
Clearwire would argue otherwise - they do voice over wimax now.
It's probably via a VOIP ATA integrated into their modems.
Edit: I forgot that I had a Clearwire VOIP ATA, I got it cheap from bestbuy and just set it up with voip.ms.

Product Name: SPA-2102
Edited by NiteSnow, 22 May 2012 - 06:05 AM.
#9
Posted 23 May 2012 - 09:26 AM
That is interesting, I previously remember my 3G icon always popping up when sending MMS/SMS and connected to WiMax, but it was been almost a year since that occurred.
Your 3G icon appeared because it was sending the MMS/SMS over the 3G signal, Not WiMax 4G signal.
#10
Posted 23 May 2012 - 10:09 AM
Your 3G icon appeared because it was sending the MMS/SMS over the 3G signal, Not WiMax 4G signal.
That is my point, I thought I read about a year ago that Sprint/Clear has gotten SMS/mms working over Wimax. That was when I stopped seeing the 3g icon show when connected to Wimax
Sent from my CM9 Epic 4g Touch using Forum Runner
#11
Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:15 PM
LTE and CDMA on 1900Mhz should have the same propagation characteristics after network vision so if you get 3G & Voice you'll get LTE. LTE is better with lower signal from what I've seen you can get speeds of 20mbit/s at signal levels of -106dBm vs CDMA which drops down to 0.05mbit/s or less at -106 dBm. WiMax is a broadband technology, it's not meant for Voice, SMS, or MMS.
So hope that really comes true and lte everywhere 3g is
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
#12
Posted 23 May 2012 - 07:04 PM
#13
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:04 AM
So hope that really comes true and lte everywhere 3g is
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
Its better than just Sprint's word. Sprint has spent millions on deployment plans and scheduling to bring LTE to every site with Network Vision upgrades. It is coming. Even to those remote and obscure sites out in the middle of a cornfield.
When people complain about Sprint's past deployments, it almost always because of assumptions about deployment. Not any official or inside deployment info. Everyone assumed Sprint and Clearwire were taking WiMax nationwide, but Sprint never said that. Because they never actually planned to do that.
However, Sprint says with LTE that they are going nationwide this time. And also we have the evidence if that and continually report on it. This is completely a different deployment. Not only unprecedented with Sprint. But actually, unprecedented with any carrier in America...ever.
Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner
#14
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:23 AM
Its better than just Sprint's word. Sprint has spent millions on deployment plans and scheduling to bring LTE to every site with Network Vision upgrades. It is coming. Even to those remote and obscure sites out in the middle of a cornfield.
When people complain about Sprint's past deployments, it almost always because of assumptions about deployment. Not any official or inside deployment info. Everyone assumed Sprint and Clearwire were taking WiMax nationwide, but Sprint never said that. Because they never actually planned to do that.
However, Sprint says with LTE that they are going nationwide this time. And also we have the evidence if that and continually report on it. This is completely a different deployment. Not only unprecedented with Sprint. But actually, unprecedented with any carrier in America...ever.
Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner
I wish more people could understand this. I see so many comments on other blogs about how Sprint lied and never delivered on their promise to bring Wimax to whatever part of the country they happen to occupy. Yet, every promo or ad I ever saw regarding 4G from Sprint or any other carrier always said something to the effect of "4G speeds not guaranteed. 4G is not available everywhere."
#15
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:31 AM
Great post... ThanksIts better than just Sprint's word. Sprint has spent millions on deployment plans and scheduling to bring LTE to every site with Network Vision upgrades. It is coming. Even to those remote and obscure sites out in the middle of a cornfield.
When people complain about Sprint's past deployments, it almost always because of assumptions about deployment. Not any official or inside deployment info. Everyone assumed Sprint and Clearwire were taking WiMax nationwide, but Sprint never said that. Because they never actually planned to do that.
However, Sprint says with LTE that they are going nationwide this time. And also we have the evidence if that and continually report on it. This is completely a different deployment. Not only unprecedented with Sprint. But actually, unprecedented with any carrier in America...ever.
Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Excited to eventually test lte in 2013...
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
#16
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:40 AM
However, Sprint says with LTE that they are going nationwide this time. And also we have the evidence if that and continually report on it. This is completely a different deployment. Not only unprecedented with Sprint. But actually, unprecedented with any carrier in America...ever.
Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner
Robert,
I love your posts, they are epic sometimes, and you remind me of bill pulman in independance day with that presidential speech toward the end.... or mel gibson during that speech in braveheart.....
#17
Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:55 AM
#18
Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:34 AM
they may take our WiMax,
but they cannot take our EVO 4G LTE!!!Wait, what? They held up our EVO 4G LTE Shipments..... ok ummm...
I needed that today! Thanks!!!
Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner
#19
Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:21 PM
Great post... Thanks
Excited to eventually test lte in 2013...
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
I hate you...such a beautiful phone!!
Current Phones
Apple iPhone 5 32GB - Pure Apple'ish
Blackberry Bold 9930 - Probably the last guy using a BB
Apple iPad Mini with Sprint LTE - Pure Apple'ish
#20
Posted 26 May 2012 - 07:56 PM
I hate you...such a beautiful phone!!
I agree
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













