archon810

Oh, and not sure if you realize but the Mega 6.3 was already announced by Sprint (just in case you didn't): http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/sprint-to-bring-unlimited-data-experience-to-samsung-galaxy-mega.htm.

Just to give some background, we've suspected the SPH-L600 was the Mega 6.3 for a while now http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/05/30/sph-l600-passes-through-bluetooth-certification-likely-the-samsung-galaxy-mega-6-3-for-sprint/. Looks like it was spot on. But yeah, no way is it dethroning the Note 3 - the specs aren't even close to do so. Just because of the bands?

Robert, I love your work and all, but in my opinion this editorial unjustly lashes out at people who don't have coverage. Here's the problem in your argument: Sprint officially launched LTE in several markets. As far as people are concerned, Sprint launched LTE. They didn't launch 40%. Not 30%. Not 20%. They said they launched it as far as its customers are concerned and were communicated. What Sprint is "targeting" is something consumers are not privy to. It's not something that's communicated to them. So yeah, when people don't have LTE in a city that was promised to have one, they're going to be upset. And rightfully so. Of course, most of them overreact and behave like little children (actually, worse - this is the Internet), but I don't find it entirely unjustified and needing some pretty harsh words above. My 2 cents.