Jump to content
RedSpark

LG G6 to be Sprint's first HPUE-capable device

Recommended Posts

PythonFanPA    1,693

For those for which this matters (obviously not everyone), they've also gone with a waterproof design this time around meaning no more removable/switchable battery.  I think LG was the last resort previously in this regard.   Here's a rundown from Engadget's coverage of MWC:

 

https://www.engadget.com/2017/02/26/lg-g6-preview-mwc/

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lilotimz    10,864

Need more powah. It's not over 9000!

 

KPIQzPv.png

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rackhivee    87

100-150 mw gain over B25 and B26 taking maximum into consideration. I want to get this smartphone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kamiller42    58

Good to know my LG V20 with "advanced programmable modem" is already outdated.  :(

 

Can they add this functionality to the V20?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dParis    10

Good to know my LG V20 with "advanced programmable modem" is already outdated.  :(

 

Can they add this functionality to the V20?

 

Perhaps they can.  Either way, should OEM's stop developing or incorporating new technologies in their new devices to avoid rendering the perception of their older devices obsolete?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kamiller42    58

Perhaps they can.  Either way, should OEM's stop developing or incorporating new technologies in their new devices to avoid rendering the perception of their older devices obsolete?

 

We're talking about the LG V20, not an LG G4. It was released just months ago, during a time when Sprint knew HPUE was right around the corner. I'm sure Sprint and LG have conversations about what Sprint needs in their phones.

 

In addition, LG advertised as the modem as "future proof."

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
travismheim    592

 

 

We're talking about the LG V20, not an LG G4. It was released just months ago, during a time when Sprint knew HPUE was right around the corner. I'm sure Sprint and LG have conversations about what Sprint needs in their phones.

 

In addition, LG advertised as the modem as "future proof."

Tech gets outdated with new releases all the time. New LTE bands, processor features, camera quirks etc. Nothing is ever future proof. Whatever was necessary to make HPUE work just probably wasn't available in time for the V20. It doesn't make the V20 instantly worthless, it just doesn't have the latest and greatest.

 

Sent from my 2PYB2 using Tapatalk

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jreuschl    482

In addition, LG advertised as the modem as "future proof."

It can happen. A good example probably is the Note 4 and the Note Edge. Note 4 doesn't have CA because Samsung wanted to get that out first and the chipset was in shorter supply. Edge is basically the same phone but received CA having been released a month or so later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dParis    10

So, does anyone have an idea when we will be able to get our hands on this device?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JimBob    797

So, does anyone have an idea when we will be able to get our hands on this device?

Early April

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dParis    10

Early April

 

I've read all kinds of blurbs stating a U.S. release of April 7th.  I've seen nothing confirmed for Sprint though, except "coming soon".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ericdabbs    1,931

For those for which this matters (obviously not everyone), they've also gone with a waterproof design this time around meaning no more removable/switchable battery. I think LG was the last resort previously in this regard. Here's a rundown from Engadget's coverage of MWC:

 

https://www.engadget.com/2017/02/26/lg-g6-preview-mwc/

It was definitely a good move to ditch the removable battery for the waterproof design. The removable battery exposed small creases where water csn seep in and to be honest having it waterproof (IP68) is now a must with the high end smartphones.

 

People rely on their phones everywhere and what bothered me on my current Note 5 is whether i can use it safely in the rain. Forget about trying to shower with it or take it to a waterpark. All i care about is whether i can view it in the rain safely and/or if there was an incident where a small drink was spilled on the phone.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smooth25    199

I disagree. Removable battery is way more useful for me than having a waterproof phone. I don't plan on using my phone in the water. Removable battery is something different from Apple and Samsung, now its the same so why should I choose LG over the others especially with an older processor.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ericdabbs    1,931

I disagree. Removable battery is way more useful for me than having a waterproof phone. I don't plan on using my phone in the water. Removable battery is something different from Apple and Samsung, now its the same so why should I choose LG over the others especially with an older processor.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

 

That is not the only thing that is different between the S8 and G6.  There is also the dual camera setup which Samsung does not have.  Also the base non-removable battery for the G6 (3300 maH) is going to be larger than the the S8 (rumored 3000 maH).

 

Of course to each their own.  By the way if you didn't read my previous post, I didn't say anything about using in the water.  Its just easier nowadays just to carry a mini battery pack to give you that charge that replaces a removable battery. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smooth25    199

I know what you meant I was just being sarcastic about using in water lol. They always show videos of people dropping their phones in puddles but if that happens water isn't the biggest issue. Unless it's screen is unbreakable I prefer battery.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dkoellerwx    7,908

That is not the only thing that is different between the S8 and G6.  There is also the dual camera setup which Samsung does not have.  Also the base non-removable battery for the G6 (3300 maH) is going to be larger than the the S8 (rumored 3000 maH).

 

Of course to each their own.  By the way if you didn't read my previous post, I didn't say anything about using in the water.  Its just easier nowadays just to carry a mini battery pack to give you that charge that replaces a removable battery. 

 

If you plan on using the device for more than a year, the removable battery aspect is very important. Battery life has improved somewhat, but I am already seeing a decrease in total battery capacity on my LG G5 and I haven't owned it for a year yet. I'll likely be replacing the battery soon because the current one is slowly but surely losing capacity. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
twospirits    3,494

If you plan on using the device for more than a year, the removable battery aspect is very important. Battery life has improved somewhat, but I am already seeing a decrease in total battery capacity on my LG G5 and I haven't owned it for a year yet. I'll likely be replacing the battery soon because the current one is slowly but surely losing capacity. 

Beside that very important point ^, I truly believe having a removable battery would have lessen the issue with battery problems. For example, the Galaxy Note 7. By Samsungs' own admission, the cause were due to two separate battery flaws and not the device itself. Having a removable battery would have made it easier to send back the battery back instead of the whole device. Having a metal back, totally fused instead of a removable plastic back is mute especially since the majority put their device in a protective cover. The same for LG or any other manufacturer.

 

TS

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
danlodish345    702

I honestly don't see having a removable battery as a critical feature for deciding a phone that would buy. I would pay it LG to fix the phone's battery if it came to that

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
imex99    1,187

I'm really hoping these phones ship early...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
danlodish345    702

I'm really hoping these phones ship early...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Me too I pre-ordered mine the other day
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
imex99    1,187

Me too I pre-ordered mine the other day

Ugh, T-Mobile started yesterday and already shipping....friend already has tracking number!!!!

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
danlodish345    702

Ugh, T-Mobile started yesterday and already shipping....friend already has tracking number!!!!

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah it's annoying I hate waiting for it

 

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • PROGRESSIVE RAFFLE
    FOR AN iPHONE 8

    iphonexiphone8.jpg

    WHICH CAN PROGRESS TO AN iPHONE 8+ OR AN iPHONE X
    **or an Android device of equal or lesser value**

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I am definitely interested in checking more into this phone. Am I correct in assuming all phones being released from this point on (before now, really)  are HPUE compliant?
    • You literally said #2 carrier ahead of AT&T. They're #2 not because of network metrics but because of the amount of subscribers they have. Nationally, they're still ranked last in terms of overall network performance because despite their square milage, they still lack in call and text reliability. There is zero doubt that they have one of, if not the fastest network in the country but that is far from the only metric to measure a network, even if it's the most important to you. All you have to do is look at the recent reddit thread that suggested T-Mobile might stop their program that gives people those Cellspots to see that a lot of people were ready to switch because the only thing keeping them on was that device giving them service indoors. At least we know Sprint is going all in on the Magic Boxes and they treat it as a part of their network instead of as just another device.
    • Nothing to do anything about number of customers... How are they not on par with the big two?  TMobile is crushing it for data in all the major markets.  If TMobile can execute their 2017 coverage map goal, they will be on par with AT&T, which is considered to be in the same coverage league as VZW.  So yes, TMobile will be in this club come 2018. https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/lte-comparison-map
    • This is a reach. AT&T and Verizon still have twice as many customers as T-Mobile and even if they added 2 Million customers per quarter it would take 8 years before they got to VZ and AT&T's current size, assuming VZW or AT&T don't have any growth at all. We can acknowledge T-Mobile's accomplishments without making it seem like they're nearly on par with the big two. In terms of data speed, sure. In terms of price, they're approaching it too. However, you won't be able to find the consistency of the duopoly's network nationwide on T-Mobile right now. That'll take quite a bit more infill sites. That's why given Sprint's "non-announcement" of 8K macro sites for expansion, I'm glad to see it's not a huge expansion because we know that they're going for reliability over square mileage.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×