Jump to content

iPhone 7/7 Plus User's Thread


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

For iPhones:

 

HD Voice will work over cellular Sprint to cellular Sprint calls even if either device has Wi-Fi Calling enabled on their account. This was fixed last year. 

 

If one party is using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, and one is cellular, it will not be HD. 

 

If both parties are using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, it will be HD. 

 

Really all that's left is the ability to do HD voice on cellular to Wi-Fi calls (or vice versa).... and then cross-carrier compatibility. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For iPhones:

 

HD Voice will work over cellular Sprint to cellular Sprint calls even if either device has Wi-Fi Calling enabled on their account. This was fixed last year.

 

If one party is using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, and one is cellular, it will not be HD.

 

If both parties are using Sprint Wi-Fi calling for the call, it will be HD.

 

Really all that's left is the ability to do HD voice on cellular to Wi-Fi calls (or vice versa).... and then cross-carrier compatibility.

On my initial test, ur conclusion is wrong....

 

Turned wifi calling on, made wifi call from home and non hd of course.

 

Walked out of my wifi range and made a call, phone call is not hd....

 

More testing needed of course!!!

 

fa6542407af441fe4731d7ac9f3d4857.jpg

 

https://www.sprint.com/en/support/solutions/services/faqs-about-wi-fi-calling.html

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who/what were you calling?

 

Also, I don't know why they say HD voice is disabled with Wi-Fi calling, because it sounds glorious when talking to another Sprint user that is on Wi-Fi calling.

 

Maybe they mean it doesn't work, because they assume you'll be calling Cellular sprint users? (In which case they're right, it won't be HD from wifi to cellular)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who/what were you calling?

 

Also, I don't know why they say HD voice is disabled with Wi-Fi calling, because it sounds glorious when talking to another Sprint user that is on Wi-Fi calling.

 

Maybe they mean it doesn't work, because they assume you'll be calling Cellular sprint users? (In which case they're right, it won't be HD from wifi to cellular)

Both my dad and my sister have wifi calling enabled on their line (LG G6 and iPhone 7) and they no longer get Sprint HD calling at all while on cellular. Wifi calls sound good, but enabling wifi calling on your line even if you don't use it kills a lot of features for some reason.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tested again, hd calling is not working and won't work on iPhone until u call and have that specific soc code removed from ur line...

 

Called sprint iPhone to android and no hd voice.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tested again, hd calling is not working and won't work on iPhone until u call and have that specific soc code removed from ur line...

 

Called sprint iPhone to android and no hd voice.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This has been my families experience as well. iPhone to iPhone, iPhone to Android, Android to Android it doesn't seem to matter. It's like the wifi calling option on the line disables HD calling among other features. To be clear wifi calls still sound good, but Sprint HD calling on cellular seems to get disabled once wifi calling is enabled on that line.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only interesting thing in the update cellular-wise is that you are no longer able to display your signal strength in dBm at the top of your phone. You’re stuck with bars. And there are only four of them now, not five...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only interesting thing in the update cellular-wise is that you are no longer able to display your signal strength in dBm at the top of your phone. You’re stuck with bars. And there are only four of them now, not five...

Yeah I noticed this too. Android has 4 bars, correct?

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that Android had 5 although I may be wrong...

Android doesn't really have bars anymore, it's a little wedge and there seems to be more than five "levels" from what I can tell.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Android doesn't really have bars anymore, it's a little wedge and there seems to be more than five "levels" from what I can tell.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Oh...I was under the impression that there were five levels in the little wedge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay. I had thought I had seen Android devices with four bars. Maybe it was older devices with older versions of Android on them. Oh well, either way I would prefer the fifth bar in iOS 11's new signal indicator.

 

-Anthony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah okay. I had thought I had seen Android devices with four bars. Maybe it was older devices with older versions of Android on them. Oh well, either way I would prefer the fifth bar in iOS 11's new signal indicator.

 

-Anthony

Agreed. As well as the option to display dBm.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. Still the same old Field Test :(. Only difference is that you can’t display dBm in your status bar anymore.

It doesn't display dBm on the status bar while in Field Test anymore either?

 

Also, does the information populate faster, or is it still sporadic at times?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 7 Plus using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't display dBm on the status bar while in Field Test anymore either?

 

Also, does the information populate faster, or is it still sporadic at times?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 7 Plus using Tapatalk Pro

Seems to populate faster but need to pay more attention....

 

0e5c2e81ca85535067a866b15257a466.jpg61fc69cf1544005e28b4004f6ae6972c.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to populate faster but need to pay more attention....

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That status bar sure looks nicer with signal bars. Will definitely miss seeing dBm up there though.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 7 Plus using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...