Jump to content

galaxy Note II on 2456 prl


cfli1688c1

Recommended Posts

i have a galaxy Note II that the prl version is 2456.  From what i read, this is for business.  The problem i have with it is this: at my office i can not make or receive calls or text, i have no problem if i am 1 street block away.  I have a LG phone and its prl verison is 55056, and it does not have any call/text problem.  I have do many prl updates and carrier resets, the prl will not update to the 55056.  Anyone know how to get the Note II to update to the 55056 prl version?  thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have a galaxy Note II that the prl version is 2456.  From what i read, this is for business.  The problem i have with it is this: at my office i can not make or receive calls or text, i have no problem if i am 1 street block away.  I have a LG phone and its prl verison is 55056, and it does not have any call/text problem.  I have do many prl updates and carrier resets, the prl will not update to the 55056.  Anyone know how to get the Note II to update to the 55056 prl version?  thanks.

 

My spidey sense says that there is more to this story.  The Samsung Galaxy Note II is a really old handset at this point.  Did you flash this PRL yourself?  Did you buy this handset used?  You may have created your own problem -- or stumbled into one that someone else created and passed off on you.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...