Jump to content

Moto X 2015 "Pure Edition" [users thread]


nexuss4g

Recommended Posts

Not the only error on the specs site

 

http://phandroid.com/2015/07/28/moto-x-style-verizon/

 

Not so fast.  Motorola or Phandroid may end up with egg on its face over this one.  Bar none, the "UC2" variant is not authorized for band 13 nor CDMA2000.  Unless it gets a Class II Permissive Change filing or the "UC1" variant also ends up as a Pure Edition, both parties are at least partly wrong.  The only accurate part is that there is a Moto X Style that is compatible with VZW -- it just may not be the Pure Edition.

 

And, just to be clear, Moto X Style is what the 2015 version is being called, right?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so fast.  Motorola or Phandroid may end up with egg on its face over this one.  Bar none, the "UC2" variant is not authorized for band 13 nor CDMA2000.  Unless it gets a Class II Permissive Change filing or the "UC1" variant also ends up as a Pure Edition, both parties are at least partly wrong.  The only accurate part is that there is a Moto X Style that is compatible with VZW -- it just may not be the Pure Edition.

 

And, just to be clear, Moto X Style is what the 2015 version is being called, right?

 

AJ

Yes, my understanding is that Style = Pure. Apparently Motorola has no plans currently to sell the Play model in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My personal concern is will sprint whitelist the Moto X variant for their network.

The pure phone is already confirmed to be unlocked and working with all carriers (said in the announcement)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current price of the Nexus 6 is $499. Different yes, but not that much different.

 

I would not compare the current price of a nine month old handset to the current price of a new handset.  Compare the starting prices of both.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current price of the Nexus 6 is $499. Different yes, but not that much different.

Yeah, but that's a closeout price in the N6. All the Moto X derivatives dropped in price the past few months as the new releases started to become imminent. The fact that the Moto X 2013 went on discount prior to the Moto X 2014 being released didn't mean that the new 2014 was offered cheaper. The 2014 was offered at full price and 2013 at a discount.

 

Since there are two Nexus derivatives expected this year, one of them is likely to be less expensive. But the current discount Nexus 6 pricing doesn't have much foretelling about the new ones.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not compare the current price of a nine month old handset to the current price of a new handset. Compare the starting prices of both.

 

AJ

I was typing a similar thought. [emoji38]

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pure phone is already confirmed to be unlocked and working with all carriers (said in the announcement)

Yeah, but like AJ noted, for FCC approval they actually sent TWO variants. One with CDMA and Verizon/Sprint support and one without. Very confusing indeed since they specs they list on Moto's site do indeed match up with the "GSM" model, and yet they claim that it is "pure" and one variant should work with all carriers. Go figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, my understanding is that Style = Pure. Apparently Motorola has no plans currently to sell the Play model in the US.

 

This naming convention is scatterbrained.  But I guess that Motorola did not want to release just a "Moto X" for the third year in a row.

 

Somebody should post a succinct rundown of what is what.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so fast.  Motorola or Phandroid may end up with egg on its face over this one.  Bar none, the "UC2" variant is not authorized for band 13 nor CDMA2000.  Unless it gets a Class II Permissive Change filing or the "UC1" variant also ends up as a Pure Edition, both parties are at least partly wrong.  The only accurate part is that there is a Moto X Style that is compatible with VZW -- it just may not be the Pure Edition.

 

And, just to be clear, Moto X Style is what the 2015 version is being called, right?

 

AJ

B13 officially added to Moto Tech page. UC1=Pure?

 

http://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones/moto-x-pure.html#specs-moto-x-pure-us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moto X Style = 2015 Moto X Pure Edition = no bueno on Sprint?

Moto X Play = 2015 Moto X = no bueno in US?

 

???

 

This is all no bueno...

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B13 officially added to Moto Tech page. UC1=Pure?

 

http://www.motorola.com/us/smartphones/moto-x-pure.html#specs-moto-x-pure-us

 

No band 26.  Still, no bueno...

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two tenths of an inch is a deal breaker for you? That's about the width of this O. If you can live with 5.5, you can live with 5.7.

 

Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk

I would already be settling with 5.5" screen. My optimal screen size is 5.2". It's the reason I didn't jump to the G3, and it's the reason I didn't jump to the G4. The specs of the Pure/Style version are great...aside from size. I can't just be quarter inch'd to death! My only hope now is the Nexus later this year, hopefully with a SD 820.

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only hope now is the Nexus later this year, hopefully with a SD 820.

 

Help me, Nexus Kenobi.  You're my only hope.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me, Nexus Kenobi.  You're my only hope.

 

AJ

Nexus 2015: Return of the LG.

 

I hope the new Nexus will be priced around this range. I love my Nexus 5 and when I tried the Nexus 6 I just didn't like the size or the price of it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the moto x style/pure is the uc1 variant, there is still a typo as it does support band 26 as per article on the FCC filing. Just wish marketing materials would reflect properly to avoid confusion.

 

Plus being able to work on network and be explicitly supported are two different things. As is the case that happened with the moto x 2014 edition. So I'm hopeful the wording is at its being used. That all carriers are on board to support. As they don't have to house space for the device themselves. I also hope this sets precedence in using modems for all US national carrier network off contract devices. Sprint phones need to be added to database to work. Verizon just needs to be an active LTE sim to operate on its network most cases I've read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious...will Sprint carry the Play version at all? Or just the Pure?

As stated in the launch event, the Play version will be available only outside the US. No Sprint.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would already be settling with 5.5" screen. My optimal screen size is 5.2". It's the reason I didn't jump to the G3, and it's the reason I didn't jump to the G4. The specs of the Pure/Style version are great...aside from size. I can't just be quarter inch'd to death! My only hope now is the Nexus later this year, hopefully with a SD 820.

 

Sent from my M8

Agreed. 5.2" is my favorite too. But I'm willing to do 5.5. So I'm willing to do 5.7. I'm looking forward to going smaller than this Nexus 6. Even if it's just a little bit.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://fortune.com/2015/07/28/motorola-carriers-devices/?xid=yahoo_fortune

 

 

Come launch day, you won’t find a single Moto X Pure Edition at a carrier store. Here’s why:

 

 

I don't know if a Fortune.com article can be believed.  If this is true, I don't think it is good news for Sprint users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. 5.2" is my favorite too. But I'm willing to do 5.5. So I'm willing to do 5.7. I'm looking forward to going smaller than this Nexus 6. Even if it's just a little bit.

 

Using Tapatalk on Nexus 6

I had a hard time reaching the pulldown bar at the top of the G3 when I first tried a 5.5" phone. I often use my phone one handed so it's very handy to keep the size in check. I wish the M9 didn't have heat issues because it's a great phone otherwise.

 

Definitely going to hold out for the Nexus, especially since the Moto phones for this year are coming out in September.

 

The Pure phone seems to be trying to take a jab Samsung's Note. Around the same size screen, with the additional specs/perks that Note users would typically have (aside from the S pen.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a hard time reaching the pulldown bar at the top of the G3 when I first tried a 5.5" phone.  I often use my phone one handed so it's very handy to keep the size in check.  I wish the M9 didn't have heat issues because it's a great phone otherwise.

 

Definitely going to hold out for the Nexus, especially since the Moto phones for this year are coming out in September.

 

Use Nova Launcher, with pull down from anywhere on the screen to pull down notification shade.  It's the best for larger phones.  (All kinds of custom actions are possible)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use Nova Launcher, with pull down from anywhere on the screen to pull down notification shade.  It's the best for larger phones.  (All kinds of custom actions are possible)

I definitely love Nova Launcher and I do use it, even for those reasons!  But that work-around doesn't work when I'm within apps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://fortune.com/2015/07/28/motorola-carriers-devices/?xid=yahoo_fortune

 

 

I don't know if a Fortune.com article can be believed.  If this is true, I don't think it is good news for Sprint users.

At the end of the article states: "Will Motorola’s new approach work? It’s hard to say. Motorola made it clear after the event ended that it still has more devices left to announce this year, and it’s unclear if those devices whether or not those devices will launch with carrier partnerships." Hopefully, they announce something around the time the new Nexus 2015 arrives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...