Jump to content

LG G Flex 2 [FCC ID ZNFLS996]


NateC

Recommended Posts

New LG device supporting Sprint bands spotted in FCC OET filings today:

 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=308109&fcc_id=ZNFLS996

 

FCC ID: ZNFLS996
Model(s): LS996, LGLS996, LG-LS996
 
LTE bands supported: 4, 12, 25, 26, 41
 
Physical dimensions of overall device:  142 mm x 71.2 mm (5.6" x 2.8")
 

1ld7tyF.png

 

kai1ys1.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too big for me, but I'm glad to see them finally beginning to add the CCA bands (2/4/5/12) to some more models.

 

If this ships after February 11, it will be interesting to see whether or not Sprint will unlock it (or any other device that passes through the FCC this winter), given that it's clearly been "developed" already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A hair smaller than the G3...  Wonder what it could be...  A little early for the G4 isn't it?

 

Edit:  New LG G Flex?

 

I'm curious too, since the size doesn't seem to line up with any existing LG device.  Googling "LS996" does show references to a LG G Flex, but those were pages from 2013.  So I suppose it could be a new G Flex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one page it showed the fcc label, with an meid open. Tried entering it in as a sprint device, just for kicks, and said it wasnt in the system. Could be a LG G flex remake. Remember the s3 got a remake recently, so wouldnt be suprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A hair smaller than the G3...  Wonder what it could be...  A little early for the G4 isn't it?

 

Edit:  New LG G Flex?

 

 

I'm curious too, since the size doesn't seem to line up with any existing LG device.  Googling "LS996" does show references to a LG G Flex, but those were pages from 2013.  So I suppose it could be a new G Flex.

 

 

On one page it showed the fcc label, with an meid open. Tried entering it in as a sprint device, just for kicks, and said it wasnt in the system. Could be a LG G flex remake. Remember the s3 got a remake recently, so wouldnt be suprised.

 

LG G Flex is LG LS995, and this is LG LS996. Put 2 & 2 together, and you get the LG G Flex 2. Happy Thanksgiving! Expect up to a month before the Class II permissive and then another 2-4 weeks before sale.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LG G Flex is LG LS995, and this is LG LS996. Put 2 & 2 together, and you get the LG G Flex 2. Happy Thanksgiving! Expect up to a month before the Class II permissive and then another 2-4 weeks before sale.

The original G Flex came out Jan 31, so this lines up well for a similar release date.

 

So it'll be about a week before the new unlock policy goes into effect.. perfect lol. I expect a number of attractive devices (including possibly the Z4 & Z4 Ultra, which have been tipped for a CES unveiling) to be released in late January/early February. Hold strong folks!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reviewing the ERP/EIRP for this device, RF characteristics are mid-range for everything but Band 41, which runs in the higher region. I guess we will see for sure once the device is released.

 

And I do expect this to support Wi-Fi calling out of the box.

Edited by MacinJosh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meep!

 

http://www.androidauthority.com/lg-g-flex-2-ces-january-570764/

 

LG is gearing up to release the second generation of the curved G Flex at CES Las Vegas in January, sources told Android Authority.

Details about the new device are scarce for now, but according to persons close to the matter, the G Flex 2 will be a “major upgrade” over its predecessor. The device is said to feature a high resolution plastic-based OLED screen (Full HD, most likely) in a smaller form factor. The self-healing coating will make a return on the G Flex 2, in an improved form.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How was the original? Was there much developer support for ROMS?

 

it was a niche phone so it didn't get much developer support, it was able to be rooted right away, but they didn't get a custom recovery working until a few weeks ago. without that there wasn't much use for ROMS, i looked shortly after the recovery was done and there wasn't really any yet. which wasn't all bad since the phone works really well and doesn't really have any issues out of the box :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

3xCA, 300Mbps theoretical max (source: http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-g-flex-2-specs)

 

my next phone could already be on the boat if CA works with Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a nice beautiful phone. Nice processor too.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the reason limiting the device to two carrier aggregation when its possible for 3?

 

CAT 6 UE is limited to max of 40 mhz of aggregated LTE spectrum so 20+20 is the max aggregated amount. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Total maximum bandwidth of 20Mhz.

 

That boat just may have sank.

 

Waiting for reviews and actual usage or the next boat...

 

  • > 2GB RAM

  • > 48 GB storage

  • microSD card

  • 1080p or greater

  • android 4 or greater

  • Sprint and CCA bands

     

     

Edited by dkyeager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Total maximum bandwidth of 20Mhz.

 

That boat just sank.

 

Waiting for the next boat...

 

 

  • > 2GB RAM

  • > 48 GB storage

  • microSD card

  • 1080p or greater

  • android 4 or greater

  • Sprint and CCA bands

     

     

Wait I thought it could do 2 carrier of 20mhz on b41? Is it that important to have even more than 2 carriers at this point? From what I had read its 32gb internal, plus additional support for more with a microsd. And its a device with a 5.5" screen 1080p is overkill anyway, just saying. Lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the reason limiting the device to two carrier aggregation when its possible for 3?

CAT 6 UE is limited to max of 40 mhz of aggregated LTE spectrum so 20+20 is the max aggregated amount.

He may have been asking why the phone has only been certified for Cat 6, when its SoC (SD 810) is Cat 9-ready.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...