Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I live in Virginia and you will not see Charter here in the Commonwealth, it is mostly Comcast, Cox, Verizon Fios, maybe some AT&T here and there, but no Charter. So the question stands.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

What?  Charter is in newport news, norfolk and portmouth and i think that is even before they have migrated over the newly purchased Time warner assets.  TW has stores in abingdon, herndon and richlands, va.  most cable companies do not put random stores into areas where there is no service.  they wouldnt get much foot traffic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BT-AC106_CHARTE_16U_20150528094340.jpg

 

This is the combined company's combined coax footprint.

 

I wish these cable/wireless mergers would stop for the sake of competition, but I will say that TWC subscriber-access "public" wifi covers virtually every public Sprint indoor deadzone in my immediate area and it would be sweet if Sprint subs got access to that wifi.

 

Edit: and here's a population density map since that gives some more meaning to the data.

US%20Population%20density,%202010.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You speaking of RoadRunner which was split off from Time Warner, and I'm in the Herndon area where Cox dominates.

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

Charter purchased the cable assets of Time Warner and Brighthouse.  Road runner was just a brand name for TWs high speed internet that they dropped a couple of years ago.  Charter has all of Time warners residential and business class cable and internet accounts and networks now.  Regardless, Charter also has a few spots in virginia that they have had all along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain why combining with Charter would help Sprint. Most Sprint customers do not live anywhere near Charter.

Who said anything about "helping"? If a move like that does happen, it won't be to help Sprint, but more to line Charter shareholder's pockets.

 

But I doubt something like this happens. If this were an office pool, my money is on SoftBank buying T-Mobile and finally shutting down the Sprint HQ. Sprint hasn't been successfully run in a very long time and T-Mobile has been the flavor of the month for a very long time. Also shorter flights between Japan and Seattle.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I proposed was that Verizon and Dish Merge nd then TMobile and Sprint merge. Then T-Mobile/Sprint go into a partnership with the cable cos where cable cos video offerings get zero rated in return for reduced prices for backhaul/fronthaul and cable hotspot roaming. Maybe even combined cable modems/wifi/LTE hotspots with seamless voice handoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain why combining with Charter would help Sprint.   Most Sprint  customers do not live anywhere near Charter.

 

 

I live in Virginia and you will not see Charter here in the Commonwealth, it is mostly Comcast, Cox, Verizon Fios, maybe some AT&T here and there, but no Charter. So the question stands. Charter isn't all that big here.

 

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

This is an example of using your local experience and thinking it applies to the rest of the country... Charter has a reasonably large presence in the Midwest, the Southeast, and in the West as you can see in the map above. Many of the viewers of my station get their signal through Charter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example for which one you didn't think of. Directv which is now owned by AT&T, blankets the whole country but you didn't think about that one did you. Cable systems operate by County and city contracts, not by state. And Charter does not blanket the South East, Mid West, or South West. The biggest cable operator is still Comcast which covers more then Charter does

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example for which one you didn't think of. Directv which is now owned by AT&T, blankets the whole country but you didn't think about that one did you. Cable systems operate by County and city contracts, not by state. And Charter does not blanket the South East, Mid West, or South West. The biggest cable operator is still Comcast which covers more then Charter does

 

Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk

 

I did not suggest that they had nationwide coverage, nor that they are bigger than Comcast or "blanket" any particular area.. If you read what I posted, I was simply stating that just because they are not in your area does not mean they are not within Sprint's footprint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BT-AC106_CHARTE_16U_20150528094340.jpg

 

This is the combined company's combined coax footprint.

I don't know what that map depicts, but it definitely isn't their coax footprint. Take a look at southeast Louisiana which is majorly Cox Communications territory. They do have a fiber transport partnership with Cox, so maybe that's why Cox territories are depicted.

 

Here's an alternative map:

 

new-charter-foot-print.png

 

Source

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The prizes will again be snatched by those with the deepest pockets. Imagine Verizon buying Dish and keeping all of Dish's spectrum- and then imagine them taking a run at the remaining regionals and then comcast. The sky is the limit, much like the era when the big two gobbled up all of the low band spectrum

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't be hysterical. All net neutrality is a fight between content providers and infrastructure companies on who gets what profits.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example for which one you didn't think of. Directv which is now owned by AT&T, blankets the whole country but you didn't think about that one did you. Cable systems operate by County and city contracts, not by state.

Ever heard of a little conglomerate called SoftBank? They own or have stake in several diverse companies.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what that map depicts, but it definitely isn't their coax footprint. Take a look at southeast Louisiana which is majorly Cox Communications territory. They do have a fiber transport partnership with Cox, so maybe that's why Cox territories are depicted.

 

Here's an alternative map:

 

new-charter-foot-print.png

 

Source

Hmm. I think my map might just be showing any MSA that the cable co offers service in. So yes your map is more accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the forums down?

 

It wouldn't let me view unless I signed in.

 

Not down.  We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic.  We are having a run on guest traffic lately.  We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not down. We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic. We are having a run on guest traffic lately. We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

It's probably Marcelo trying to get ideas and your blocking him. ????????????

 

Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not down.  We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic.  We are having a run on guest traffic lately.  We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

 

It's probably Marcelo trying to get ideas and your blocking him.

 

Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

Im curious to know how many IP's originate from Sprint HQ.  :secret:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not down. We are just temporarily blocking guest traffic. We are having a run on guest traffic lately. We will temporarily shut down guest traffic between now and the end of the month when it gets extraordinarily high.

 

Robert

I wonder if the Tidal purchase caused that much of a spike on Sprint searches that it lead people to S4GRU?
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...