Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I wonder why there isn't an LG G Forever program along with this. Could this mean the LG G5 may not be available on Sprint, like how the V10 wasn't?

 

By the way, I may be switching to the G5 for the B&O HiFi device. I'm a huge fan of B&O, use to spend alot of time talking with employees of the company and know alot of great things about them, very good people there.

 

Anyways, I'm surprised that this turned into a Galaxy Forever deal, rather than an Android Forever deal, as I thought it was suppose to be.

Sprint already confirmed they'll be carrying the G5.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why there isn't an LG G Forever program along with this. Could this mean the LG G5 may not be available on Sprint, like how the V10 wasn't?

 

By the way, I may be switching to the G5 for the B&O HiFi device. I'm a huge fan of B&O, use to spend alot of time talking with employees of the company and know alot of great things about them, very good people there.

 

Anyways, I'm surprised that this turned into a Galaxy Forever deal, rather than an Android Forever deal, as I thought it was suppose to be.

I think the answer is resale value.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint already confirmed they'll be carrying the G5.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

Ah, I hadn't seen it reported online in my searches, though thank you for the information.

 

I think the answer is resale value.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Might be. I've heard LG's devices in the past did poorly with that, but considering the pretty significant upgrade to the G5, at least imo, there would be some trial of this, at least. Perhaps there will be some information posted about this reasoning later by Sprint/LG, or somewhere in wireless news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why there isn't an LG G Forever program along with this. Could this mean the LG G5 may not be available on Sprint, like how the V10 wasn't?

 

https://www.sprint.com/landings/lg-g5/index.html

http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/statement-on-sprint-offering-lg-g5.htm

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Unfortunately, nothing there about a leasing arrangement, or similar deal. I'm glad Sprint is offering it though, especially considering the disappointment many had with the V10 not being carried. .

 

Now only for LG to reveal pricing information. I haven't checked on it for a few hours, though I'll look now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why there isn't an LG G Forever program along with this. Could this mean the LG G5 may not be available on Sprint, like how the V10 wasn't?

 

By the way, I may be switching to the G5 for the B&O HiFi device. I'm a huge fan of B&O, use to spend alot of time talking with employees of the company and know alot of great things about them, very good people there.

 

Anyways, I'm surprised that this turned into a Galaxy Forever deal, rather than an Android Forever deal, as I thought it was suppose to be.

 

How could they logistically do an Android Forever program. I mean there are at least 3-4 flagship devices every 12 months (and I'm being conservative there). No?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How could they logistically do an Android Forever program. I mean there are at least 3-4 flagship devices every 12 months (and I'm being conservative there). No?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I agree that such would be difficult to implement, though that is what I've been hearing for a long time, that it would be Android Forever, not Galaxy Forever. Yet, this is definitely an easier plan to manage, I'd agree.

 

If there were to be one I think might work, is to have different classes of Android smartphone, where a person could only trade in an Android smartphone within its class, rather than by brand. Such as high-end, mid-range, and budget. Although, there could be provisions to allow a person to get a cheaper device or a more expensive one, depending on how it is setup.

 

Overall though, I still prefer the same approach I've mentioned here many times in the past, which hasn't changed and likely will never change. That is to have a simple one-year lease on all devices priced at $5 per $100 of device cost. A $700 Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 32gb therefore would be $35 monthly for 12 months ($420 for one year). If at the end of the term the customer wishes to keep the device, they'd have to agree for a one-year extension costing the same rate, which would cover the full cost of the device, plus a little extra profit for the company they'd otherwise make in a resale of the device. Or, the customer could trade in the device for a new device at the same $5 per $100 of device cost of the new device they'd get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that such would be difficult to implement, though that is what I've been hearing for a long time, that it would be Android Forever, not Galaxy Forever. Yet, this is definitely an easier plan to manage, I'd agree.

 

If there were to be one I think might work, is to have different classes of Android smartphone, where a person could only trade in an Android smartphone within its class, rather than by brand. Such as high-end, mid-range, and budget. Although, there could be provisions to allow a person to get a cheaper device or a more expensive one, depending on how it is setup.

 

Overall though, I still prefer the same approach I've mentioned here many times in the past, which hasn't changed and likely will never change. That is to have a simple one-year lease on all devices priced at $5 per $100 of device cost. A $700 Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 32gb therefore would be $35 monthly for 12 months ($420 for one year). If at the end of the term the customer wishes to keep the device, they'd have to agree for a one-year extension costing the same rate, which would cover the full cost of the device, plus a little extra profit for the company they'd otherwise make in a resale of the device. Or, the customer could trade in the device for a new device at the same $5 per $100 of device cost of the new device they'd get.

Why would you pay extra profit? The normal resale price includes a chunk of profit for celco. The BOM for a cell phone is usually around 30-35% of the msrp. Add on all the junk like r&d, manufacturing (labour and profit), marketing, transport, and taxes etc sprint et al make around 10% on post paid handsets sold at msrp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you pay extra profit? The normal resale price includes a chunk of profit for celco. The BOM for a cell phone is usually around 30-35% of the msrp. Add on all the junk like r&d, manufacturing (labour and profit), marketing, transport, and taxes etc sprint et al make around 10% on post paid handsets sold at msrp.

http://www.idigitaltimes.com/samsung-galaxy-s7-price-and-availability-details-t-mobile-and-sprint-announced-513315?page=1

 

I checked that link for some prices the various carriers are selling the Samsung Galaxy S7 for, which according to the site, the device retails for $779.99.  In my example, a one-year lease with trade-in is $420, with a one-year extension if the customer decides to keep the device, rather than trading it in, being another $420 for that additional year of $35 monthly payments, which brings it to a total cost of $840. So, based on the retail price of $779.99, that is around a $60 difference the company can keep.

 

I based this idea on the company being able to lease a device giving the customer a good option for a yearly trade-in, which then the company could resell the device after the year lease has ended. While I'm not exact on the issues of depreciation, etc. involving resale, I imagine there is some sort of additional money made by the company in doing so, rather than taking a loss on the transaction. What exactly that money is I'm sure varies. However, my example is designed to be more straightforward than current leasing structures, using a rounding system. Although not perfect, I still believe it is a good system, and I give credit to Sprint for having what I believe to be the best currently offered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this deal was announced:

 

Activate a New Sprint Account and Earn up to 25,000 American Airlines AAdvantage® miles

 

Existing Sprint customers can earn up to 5,000 AAdvantage® miles a year simply by registering their AAdvantage number at sprint.com/AAdvantage.

 

Warning:

 

Note: This offer is not combinable with the Sprint Discount Program. Existing customers who enroll in this program will not be eligible for an SDP discount and any current discount will no longer apply.

 

Perhaps this makes sense for some? Thoughts on the math? I noticed Miles are earned per account, not per subscriber. Oh well.

.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Saw this deal was announced:

 

Activate a New Sprint Account and Earn up to 25,000 American Airlines AAdvantage® miles

 

Existing Sprint customers can earn up to 5,000 AAdvantage® miles a year simply by registering their AAdvantage number at sprint.com/AAdvantage.

 

Warning:

 

 

Perhaps this makes sense for some? Thoughts on the math? I noticed Miles are earned per account, not per subscriber. Oh well.

.

 

I was hyped up on this offer before seeing that I would be trading my Discount for 5,000 miles. AA Miles are currently valued at $0.017 per mile. That means trading your discount for $85.

 

Not sure that's worth it, at least in my case.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

I was hyped up on this offer before seeing that I would be trading my Discount for 5,000 miles. AA Miles are currently valued at $0.017 per mile. That means trading your discount for $85.

 

Not sure that's worth it, at least in my case.

 

Wait a second...

 

I currently receive an Employee Discount Sprint -20% on my bill every month.  Does that mean registering for this AA program would eliminate that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a second...

 

I currently receive an Employee Discount Sprint -20% on my bill every month.  Does that mean registering for this AA program would eliminate that?

It seems so...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap. How do I cancel my registration for this AAdvantage offer? Sprint chat could not help me, even though I provided them my confirmation number.

Resubmit your discount on sprint.com/verify

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you stay on the program for a month or two you can get some of those miles and you can switch back to your regular discount.   My discount is only around $3 a month so it really doesn't make that much of a difference.  The only other thing I am considering is that I can probably able to fly cheaper on some other airline anyway.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how T-mobile fanboys talk smack on Sprint's 2.5Ghz spectrum. Johh going as far as saying it can't penetrate a paper bag

 

yet when T-mobile tests 5G with 28Ghz they get huge applause.

 

Even though I've become sort of a T-Mobile supporter, I am a major supporter of Sprint's band 41 spectrum, and I hope the best for Sprint in its growth using the spectrum. I had Sprint a few times last year, and I found band 41 to be excellent, which was even before 2x ca was implemented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12/13 Ghz perhaps much higher with a 200 MHz Carrier is so far the plan. 5G wont be commercially available until probably 2020

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Even though 2020 is so far in the future, I hope sprint deploys equipment today with 5g in mind (example: deploy microwave that can't support the speeds of 5g) or just stops this small cell deployment and focus on a rapid 5g deployment in the future. I'd hate to see a large capital spend now (when the heck are we starting again?) and then sprint takes their time to 5g and blames WiMax as the reason.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how T-mobile fanboys talk smack on Sprint's 2.5Ghz spectrum. Johh going as far as saying it can't penetrate a paper bag

 

yet when T-mobile tests 5G with 28Ghz they get huge applause.

 

except that TMO will be bidding on 600MHz ...   And why test with your "best" spectrum....  

 

and as a customer it is nice to hear that 'your' carrier is planning and thinking ahead.   So far ATT, VZW, and TMO have announced 5g tests soon.  Has Sprint?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

except that TMO will be bidding on 600MHz ... And why test with your "best" spectrum....

 

and as a customer it is nice to hear that 'your' carrier is planning and thinking ahead. So far ATT, VZW, and TMO have announced 5g tests soon. Has Sprint?

Cell density over low band.

Sprint also has a plethora of 2.5Ghz holdings in which they can swap with other carriers for low band/mid band

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

except that TMO will be bidding on 600MHz ... And why test with your "best" spectrum....

 

and as a customer it is nice to hear that 'your' carrier is planning and thinking ahead. So far ATT, VZW, and TMO have announced 5g tests soon. Has Sprint?

Until there is some form of standardization starting to happen, testing their own flavors of "5G" is pointless.

 

I should also add Sprint demonstrated more than 2.5Gbps two years ago. http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/sprints-26-gbps-demo-shows-it-time-walk-walk/2014-02-06

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...