Jump to content

Mac OS X 10.10 Yosemite Beta (Formerly iOS 8 Beta/Mac OS 10.10 Beta)


Recommended Posts

New beta probably fixes some issues related to Photos that I've run into;

my main issue with Photos  (and yes, AJ, this relates to Yosemite) is that you cannot apply

edits to icloud versions and then repopulate your ios devices with the edited photo..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I know this isnt beta related, but anybody have any experience with 3rd party macbook chargers?  I had a little incident with my macbook air charger involving my puppy... He sorta chewed thru the wire...  So i am debating on if its worth the risk to buy a 3rd party one for 1/4 the price of an authentic apple one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this isnt beta related, but anybody have any experience with 3rd party macbook chargers? I had a little incident with my macbook air charger involving my puppy... He sorta chewed thru the wire... So i am debating on if its worth the risk to buy a 3rd party one for 1/4 the price of an authentic apple one.

You can get decent pricing for oem chargers. Check macsales.com and see if they have one for a good price. Sorry your puppy chewed on it.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk 3.1.1

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd guess we see 10.10.3 on Apr 10 when the new Macbook and iWatch are released for sale...

I'm thinking that too.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk 3.1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New beta is running super smooth. Not having any lag or issues with it. Definitely very close to the final public release thats for sure.

The photos app is finally stable. I was having problems with it in previous builds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10.3.3 is releasing later today so says associated Press doc

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Been released, and so has iOS 8.3

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk 3.1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...