Jump to content

Samsung ATIV S


bucdenny

Recommended Posts

Robert, wouldn't the only way to get 52 down be with a 10x10 pcs carrier? Could they be testing something?

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

 

I assume he is using a Triband device and just on B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume he is using a Triband device and just on B41.

ATIV S NEO is a single band device, and that is Windows Phone in that screen shot.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ATIV S NEO is a single band device, and that is Windows Phone in that screen shot.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

 

I know it's Windows Phone.  I have a Windows Phone product.  But I don't know what his device is capable of.  The speed could be a speed test error.  Or it's a 10MHz carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

trying to figure out why it is coming up LTEAdvance on my Samsung Ativ S Neo which is only a band 25 device.

 

Any chance you can get an Engineering screen shot the next time that happens?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's Windows Phone. I have a Windows Phone product. But I don't know what his device is capable of. The speed could be a speed test error. Or it's a 10MHz carrier.

There is always the chance of a 10MHz carrier, but it would take them effort to push firmware to all older devices. I think it might be a fluke.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is always the chance of a 10MHz carrier, but it would take them effort to push firmware to all older devices. I think it might be a fluke.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

May have already happened. Sprint went back and had them all recertified to support 10MHz.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully?  Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot.  It is not a 52 Mbps speed test.  It reflects data usage:  1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

That is the way the app is reading what type of signal I'm getting, it isn't doing any download or uploads.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

I completely missed that. Good catch.

 

Using Nexus 5 on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, are you not reading carefully? Go back and look at that typically huge screenshot. It is not a 52 Mbps speed test. It reflects data usage: 1.58 GB downloaded, 52.73 MB uploaded.

 

AJ

I missed that too. Thanks AJ.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...