Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Minnesota Market


CuriousTim

Recommended Posts

Can you please grab a screenshot of SCP and your engineering screen along with your location?

 

Sent from my LG G4

You know, I think that I got confused. It's actually LTE 2500, B41. Sorry about that.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to see more towers along the Interstate.

Honestly, outside of the cities and maybe suburbs, I don't see any expansion happening. Not in the foreseeable future anyways. I-90 coverage is so pathetic.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone in Minnesota finding any 2nd band 25 carriers anywhere. I think it might be possible up in Duluth. Not sure about anywhere else.

Is it? Contiguous band 25 or 2 separate carriers? Duluthian here  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did you find a 2 nd carrier up there?

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

I'm an AT&T subscriber (for obvious reasons if you've ever spent extensive time here with all 4 carriers) and I was just curious as to whether or not they got more BW up and running. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm an AT&T subscriber (for obvious reasons if you've ever spent extensive time here with all 4 carriers) and I was just curious as to whether or not they got more BW up and running.

The last time I was there I had no problem getting LTE. They should finally be working on B41. That was my only complaint last summer was no b41.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time I was there I had no problem getting LTE. They should finally be working on B41. That was my only complaint last summer was no b41.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

 

I was just in Duluth a few weeks ago. Coverage was good. Was on B41 about half the time.

 

My only complaint I had which I told Sprint on Twitter was I-35 coverage around Hinckley to Duluth. Not enough towers and was on 3G most of the time until I arrived in Duluth. Was very bad. A few times I didn't have signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just in Duluth a few weeks ago. Coverage was good. Was on B41 about half the time.

 

My only complaint I had which I told Sprint on Twitter was I-35 coverage around Hinckley to Duluth. Not enough towers and was on 3G most of the time until I arrived in Duluth. Was very bad. A few times I didn't have signal.

How many band 41 carriers were you on. Just one? Or was their the 2nd one. If they have band 41 now that's just better than last summer.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just in Duluth a few weeks ago. Coverage was good. Was on B41 about half the time.

 

My only complaint I had which I told Sprint on Twitter was I-35 coverage around Hinckley to Duluth. Not enough towers and was on 3G most of the time until I arrived in Duluth. Was very bad. A few times I didn't have signal.

Where in Duluth do you frequent? At my house, they have for sure B25 active with a good signal. I used to have a Note 2 and would frequently get 20-25 down and 5-10 up on a single B25 carrier in the middle of last year, similar to what AT&T gets. But I have a Charter 60 Mbps connection so that doesn't really matter to me. Near my cabin on Island Lake and near my HS (Duluth East) you'll be lucky to latch onto B26. I notice a lot of 3G on my uncle's S6Edge+ unfortunately, but do see B41 near the mall and downtown,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I was at BestBuy Wednesday and got around 8mbps. I'm shocked they don't have band 41 up and running in Mankato. I live in Waseca, which is about 23 miles east of Mankato and we've had band 41 and channel aggregation for a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at BestBuy Wednesday and got around 8mbps. I'm shocked they don't have band 41 up and running in Mankato. I live in Waseca, which is about 23 miles east of Mankato and we've had band 41 for a year.

This is typical in Mankato everywhere now. And yeah very surprised, don't know why they stopped at St. Peter for Band 41. Especially given Mankato is a relatively huge college town.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess college town could be the reason, maybe they'll wait until summer when the college is closed. Sprint is on top of the watertower by Mankato Ford, towers by Bethany College, MSU, downtown south and west of the

Verizon building, tower by the McDonald's on hwy 169/14 and two in North Mankato.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Mankato back to 3G speeds with full bars. How disappointing.

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Yeah not good. I was the one that reported a 2nd band 25 in Minnesota. Saw it on the Twin Cities. That was a month ago. Now I'm not seeing it. Sprint has Shutdown a good amount CDMA here Hopefully that's a sign of something higher than 5x5 coming to Minnesota. Especially in places with no band 41.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I don't know exactly where you're talking about, but I'd tend to agree. The most infuriating seems to be I35 going up to Duluth. Minneapolis and Duluth have great LTE, but on the way there it's just constant switching between 3G and LTE 800. Just so frustrating when in theory they should be able to at least cover the entire freeway.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know exactly where you're talking about, but I'd tend to agree. The most infuriating seems to be I35 going up to Duluth. Minneapolis and Duluth have great LTE, but on the way there it's just constant switching between 3G and LTE 800. Just so frustrating when in theory they should be able to at least cover the entire freeway.

Pretty much anything south of Jordan. Fairmont area is a complete joke. I90 as well. Mankato is completely crippled. Going on 14 past Eagle Lake is just 1x majority of the time. Austin has both towers with dual carrier band 41, and worth nothing, only get them outside. Faribault/waterville areas are just LTE islands even with all having band 26. I can go on and on. It's disappointing, not even evdo, but straight 1x most of the time. Great service at work is promising. I would describe Sprint in majority of Minnesota as what others deride T-Mobile as, islands of LTE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...