Jump to content
abrcrmdl23

Network Vision/LTE - Columbus Market

Recommended Posts

abrcrmdl23    0

So i was on my way to my friends house and noticed a guy dangling from the Sprint tower across the street. Today i saw the lte antennas installed just like the pictures have shown i will try to get a picture up if i can buy good news for Columbus.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pyroscott    2,471

Interesting, since Columbus is not in the first or second round.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 (nakasi) using Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WiWavelength    31,432

If any other carriers have collocated on the same site, it was probably a new panel for another carrier.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4GRU    54,568

This is not Sprint LTE. The Columbus market design was just recently completed. They are just beginning planning and permitting for this market. They will not start deployment before the end of the year.

 

Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
keelerman8042    459

So does this mean that planning for the rest of the third markets are finishing up or is this just Columbus that you know of as of now just wondering

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4GRU    54,568

So does this mean that planning for the rest of the third markets are finishing up or is this just Columbus that you know of as of now just wondering

All third and fourth round markets are in various stages of completing RF design and moving on to planning/zoning/permitting and then scheduling.

 

Robert

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
keelerman8042    459

Cool! Thanks for the info

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ryry4ya    271

AJ is right. All the LTE panels you see are AT&T. I have seen 15 towers go up all around Toledo,OH. And I know it's not Sprint. AT&T are getting to Ohio 2nd as Verizon was 1st.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lynyrd65    831

AJ is right. All the LTE panels you see are AT&T. I have seen 15 towers go up all around Toledo,OH. And I know it's not Sprint. AT&T are getting to Ohio 2nd as Verizon was 1st.

 

AT&T is always there to ruin the fun. I remember when I posted something similar to this 5-6 months ago. At the time we didnt have the information we do now so I got real excited to see RRU's behind antennas on some of the towers in my areas. Turns out, it was AT&T. I was mislead because I always got great Sprint signal around these AT&T towers. The reason is AT&T and Sprint share towers (the physical structure not networking hardware). The only benefit to this (from our perspective) for Sprint users is because Sprint and AT&T collocate on so many of the same towers you can look at AT&T coverage before and after the new antenna installs and get an idea of what Sprint NV will bring with additional coverage.

 

My sister has a T-Mobile vibrant running on AT&T. Prior to the upgrades AT&T gave us about 2~3 bars of signal in my home. Now it is always 5 bars even though her phone only supports HSPA on the 1900 band. At our cabin where there used to be no signal, she occasionally gets one bar of HSPA (comparable to the NV gains on Sprint 1900) but usually gets 2~3 bars of EDGE (comparable to Sprint NV on 800 smr 1xAdvanced as AT&T EDGE is on the cellular band).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
abrcrmdl23    0

This is a sprint only tower, i used to work for sprint and i had my manager look it up in glance. It is a sprint lte panel i got a kind blurry photo,

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

post-504-13460745078443_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4GRU    54,568
This is a sprint only tower' date=' i used to work for sprint and i had my manager look it up in glance. It is a sprint lte panel i got a kind blurry photo,

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

In Columbus? No way, no how.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jefbal99    1,387

I can attest that is what all the Sprint Towers in Columbus look like. I'm pretty sure the middle odd looking antennas are the Clearwire Wimax. While I wasn't looking for any NV equipment this past weekend, nothing jumped out at me either...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Boosted20V    511

Looks like sprint 1900 mhz panels on the bottom. Top appears to be Verizon 700mhz LTE at first glance in the middle with 2 850mhz cellular antenna's on the outside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WiWavelength    31,432

This is a sprint only tower, i used to work for sprint and i had my manager look it up in glance. It is a sprint lte panel i got a kind blurry photo,

 

A "Sprint only tower" with three different sets of panels? Nope, try again.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
abrcrmdl23    0

According to sprints system the top is sprint 1900 the funny one in the middle is clear 2500 wimax, and the bottom is a now decommisioned nextel site. Just telling you what the system said

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
abrcrmdl23    0
I can attest that is what all the Sprint Towers in Columbus look like. I'm pretty sure the middle odd looking antennas are the Clearwire Wimax. While I wasn't looking for any NV equipment this past weekend, nothing jumped out at me either...

 

I don't know if our towers look different because we have wimax but sprint towers in Columbus look different than most other places i have seen sprint towers in my travels.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S4GRU    54,568

According to sprints system the top is sprint 1900 the funny one in the middle is clear 2500 wimax, and the bottom is a now decommisioned nextel site. Just telling you what the system said

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I don't know if our towers look different because we have wimax but sprint towers in Columbus look different than most other places i have seen sprint towers in my travels.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Glance does not tell which rung on a tower and who it belongs to. I can tell by looking, that the top rung does not contain Sprint panels. What would be the legacy panels are too long for PCS. To me it looks like AT&T 850 and the new one (the larger one) is an AT&T LTE panel.

 

There is no Network Vision work under way in Columbus. I have access to the design schedules. They are just now completing design. It is impossible to install panels prior to having the RF design complete. Cleveland is the only market in Ohio where design has been complete for a few months. But even after design is complete, they still have to proceed with planning, material ordering, permitting, scheduling and eventually mobilization.

 

Even in the best case scenario, I don't see Columbus starting before the end of the year.

 

Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ryry4ya    271

I will take pictures and show you the AT&T L T E ,but it will be 24 hours . trust me it's At&t

 

mobile EVO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
keelerman8042    459

I will take pictures and show you the AT&T L T E ,but it will be 24 hours . trust me it's At&t

 

mobile EVO

let me know what tower or towers locations I have yet to see any type of work anywhere in Toledo but interested even tho it's not sprint..... yet

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cjinohio03    1

I havent really seen any info/dates etc. Kind a confused why they will do Cleveland area first. With Columbus being the capital/biggest city.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JonnygATL    1,062

I havent really seen any info/dates etc. Kind a confused why they will do Cleveland area first. With Columbus being the capital/biggest city.

City limit sizes are one thing. Metro area sizes are quite another. Both Cleveland and Cincinnati are substantially larger metro areas than Columbus.

Cincinnati metro area: roughly 2.1 million people

Cleveland metro area: roughly 2.1 million but including the Akron area about 2.9 million

Columbus metro area: roughtly 1.8 million

(all of this per latest census estimates)

 

But all of that is irrelevant as the rollout clearly isn't going by order of decreasing population, anyway. It is starting to appear like they are just having Samsung, Ericsson and A-L siimply do whatever works best for them at the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChewyWade    27

City limit sizes are one thing. Metro area sizes are quite another. Both Cleveland and Cincinnati are substantially larger metro areas than Columbus.

Cincinnati metro area: roughly 2.1 million people

Cleveland metro area: roughly 2.1 million but including the Akron area about 2.9 million

Columbus metro area: roughtly 1.8 million

(all of this per latest census estimates)

 

But all of that is irrelevant as the rollout clearly isn't going by order of decreasing population, anyway. It is starting to appear like they are just having Samsung, Ericsson and A-L siimply do whatever works best for them at the time.

 

Or as I interpret things, they're saving the best for last!!! Lol

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cjinohio03    1

Ok thanks for the info. I havent always lived in Ohio, but I think Columbus has more suburbs then the other cities too. You can be on a road and it will switch to another township then back to Columbus(Corp). So maybe that is how Columbus is normally listed as the biggest city. I still would of thought they would of been first due being capital and having more technology companies then the other area.Who knows though I grew up on the East Coast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
andycapps    166

City limit sizes are one thing. Metro area sizes are quite another. Both Cleveland and Cincinnati are substantially larger metro areas than Columbus.

Cincinnati metro area: roughly 2.1 million people

Cleveland metro area: roughly 2.1 million but including the Akron area about 2.9 million

Columbus metro area: roughtly 1.8 million

(all of this per latest census estimates)

 

But all of that is irrelevant as the rollout clearly isn't going by order of decreasing population, anyway. It is starting to appear like they are just having Samsung, Ericsson and A-L siimply do whatever works best for them at the time.

 

That's if you count metro areas. With just city limits, Columbus population is over twice as big as Cincinnatti and almost twice as big as Cleveland. Metro areas are always a sticky metric because some go out much further than others.

 

Every time I see this bumped I think that there's actually news about NV in Columbus. :(

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • PROGRESSIVE RAFFLE
    FOR AN iPHONE 8

    iphonexiphone8.jpg

    WHICH CAN PROGRESS TO AN iPHONE 8+ OR AN iPHONE X
    **or an Android device of equal or lesser value**

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • you'll need to flash the Sprint firmware. 
    • There are really two providers in Canada: ROGERS and TELUS/Bell. TELUS and Bell operate the same network. 
    • How is Canada's three wireless companies working out...
    • No. You are not based in reality if you think the wireless market is going to stagnate if Sprint and T-Mobile merge. 5g is coming and will be pushed by everyone in the market place.    The question is weather you want it to follow the same pattern LTE did or not. Would you like the big two to deploy a really solid 5g network and the other two to deploy an uneven networks or 3 solid th networks?    You anti-merger people dont understand the role capital intensive industries play in shaping such markets.  If a market is capital intensive it is more efficient with fewer players. Imgaine if the market still looked like it did in 2003, we would have plenty of players and regional plans with not even 3g deployed.   Sprint has 30 billion. They are able to increase CAPEX this year because they don't have much maturing this year.  This is not the case the next two years which means they are likely to starve their network again over that time. Mean while the big two aren't going to stand still. Sprint isn't growing top line income fast enough to make themselves viable on their own.      
    • This merger would stagnate the wireless market it would stink almost immediately.  You are pro-merger but already wondering if they would have capital to build and expand the network.  Sprint now has positive revenue to increase CAPEX for additional B41, MIMO, and 5G why hault the improvements that Sprint has been making?   You guys screaming pro merger really need to sit back and really think, are you willing to see less competition and increasing wireless bills?  Not to mention that unlimited will be a thing of the past, after all it was Sprint and T-Mobile that made the big two offer unlimited.  If this merger goes through I don't want to hear complaining I am taking names...
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×