Jump to content
ingenium

What is the difference between Sprint APNs?

Recommended Posts

So it seems there are at least 3 Sprint APNs: n.ispsn, r.ispsn, and x.ispsn.

I remember seeing n.ispsn on some of my older devices. I have a hotspot from Calyx (via Mobile Citizen) that has a Sprint account that I can log into, and it's using r.ispsn. My Pixel 2 XL is using x.ispsn.

Does anyone know what the difference is between them? My only guesses are that n.ispsn is "native", and r.ispsn is "reseller". Or perhaps n.ispsn is NATed via CGNAT and r.ispsn is "routed" meaning a public IP? I have confirmed that the hotspot that uses r.ispsn is assigned a public, routable IP. But that doesn't answer what x.ispsn is. My phone with x.ispsn is assigned a NATed IP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

R=routable, N =Non routable X not sure. r.ispsn devices receive a routable ivp4 address.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
R=routable, N =Non routable X not sure. r.ispsn devices receive a routable ivp4 address.
Do you know if you can change a device with n.ispsn to r.ispsn to get a routable IP with it?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ingenium said:

Do you know if you can change a device with n.ispsn to r.ispsn to get a routable IP with it?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

I believe that would take a plan or SoC change, this is a great question but I am not sure. 

I know you can add a public IP address but that is not necessarily routable as you will hit that carrier NAT.  I have noticed there were some n.ispsn routers handed out over the last year; I believe they were the newer 910 hotspot but they were recently switched over to r.ispsn on the mysterious "backend" we are here trying to learn about. It caused quite the nasty outage for some folks for a few days.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It would be a lot more juicy without the redactions. Great.
    • That doc is sooo juicy with all the tea.  That Sprint 5G map is a mess but its hitting cities that are well off for Sprint.
    • Any thoughts, experience, or recommendations regarding LG G7 ThinQ on the Sprint network? https://www.sprint.com/en/landings/lg/lg-g7.html
    • So much juicy info in the Public Interest Statement that T-Mobile and Sprint put together for the FCC. Page 23 and 24 have some maps that show the projected extent of 5G coverage on both networks in 2024 if they were to go at it alone. Beware, the document is over 600 pages long so if anyone has free time and wants to go through the whole thing, please do! https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/10618281006240/Public Interest Statement and Appendices A-J (Public Redacted) .pdf I'll keep editing as I find more cool stuff.   Edits: I'm still reading but something to note is that on their own, it is expected that by 2021, Sprint will cover more POP's in high-speed 5G than T-Mobile. So while T-Mobile would have greater overall coverage by a long shot, Sprint would  be capable of providing 153 Million POPs with speeds greater than 150Mbps compared to only 10 Million from T-Mobile.  
    • How is the new phone treating you?
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×