Jump to content
centermedic

Phone restarting

Recommended Posts

Has anybody else's phone restarted on its own in the last 24 hours? We have HTC and Samsung and it has occurred on both makes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Pixel XL power cycled twice today. I thought it was a bit odd, or something buggy with the October security update.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah actually, our Nexus 6p power cycled about two days ago, then yesterday.

best part; then our 5x did, and went into bootloop sickness finally. We are now the proud owners of a z2 force that rebooted 5 minutes ago. What gives?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, belusnecropolis said:

Yeah actually, our Nexus 6p power cycled about two days ago, then yesterday.

best part; then our 5x did, and went into bootloop sickness finally. We are now the proud owners of a z2 force that rebooted 5 minutes ago. What gives?

Welcome to the 5x bootloop club. Our member count is approaching the total number of 5xs sold.

 

Funny how a lot of us move on to moto handsets for some reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, caspar347 said:

Welcome to the 5x bootloop club. Our member count is approaching the total number of 5xs sold.

 

Funny how a lot of us move on to moto handsets for some reason.

I thought of you when it happened.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, caspar347 said:

Welcome to the 5x bootloop club. Our member count is approaching the total number of 5xs sold.

 

Funny how a lot of us move on to moto handsets for some reason.

Almost as many with the 6P too.  Like this guy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey I am writing this from my replacement 6P, which I think is a different hardware version than my original.  Anyone want to confirm?

 

 

Screenshot_20171009-011151.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, MrZorbatron said:

Hey I am writing this from my replacement 6P, which I think is a different hardware version than my original.  Anyone want to confirm?

 

 

Screenshot_20171009-011151.png

Looks just like my OG equipment.

Screenshot_20171009-065717.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • TAPATALK VERSION
    BACK ONLINE

  • PROGRESSIVE RAFFLE
    FOR AN iPHONE 8

    iphonexiphone8.jpg

    WHICH CAN PROGRESS TO AN iPHONE 8+ OR AN iPHONE X
    **or an Android device of equal or lesser value**

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I’m sure this occurring a couple days prior means either —

      - SoftBank is leaving
      Or
      - means absolutely zilch


      I bet it’s somewhere in between. Lol.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    • The other thing I found in his video presentation was the clear lack of anything "Sprint".   John jabbed at AT&T and Verizon but nothing on or against Sprint.  Also, I don't know if you guys noticed, but the word "Duopoly" is the power word of late and is being used with more frequency! (no pun intended)....   I think it's about conditioning  the FCC and DOJ by hearing it.
    • The DOJ reviews potential antitrust issues in mergers. The FCC is supposed to look at whether the merger is in the public interest, which includes reduced competition. So the FCC could reject the merger on the grounds that the reduced competition is not in the public interest. I do not, however, see Chairman Pai doing that because he is so pro-business. From the FCC's FAQ about merger reviews:
      Q: What is the FCC’s public interest standard/test?
      A: Under section 310(d) of the Communications Act, we determine whether a proposed transaction will serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. First, we determine if the application complies with provisions of the Act and our Commission rules. If it does, then we consider whether granting the application could result in public interest harms by substantially frustrating or impairing the objectives or implementation of the Communications Act or related statutes. Competition, diversity, localism, and encouraging the provision of advanced services to all Americans are among the principle objectives of the Act. We also consider what potential public benefits might occur because of the transaction. We balance the potential public interest harms against the potential benefits. The Applicants bear the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed transaction, on balance, will serve the public interest.
    • Before we jump to this conclusion we need to see sustained financial growth over a period of time and a much larger increase in net additions to the network. Sprint is still offering the best deals in wireless and their growth is lagging the competition. This is not sustainable over the long term. Honestly, I see a merger as inevitable as the larger providers will have much more flexible cash for network enhancements in the near future, which they can then leverage to gain more customers. 
    • For exurban and rural sites, microwave and satellite backhaul are often used. 
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×