Jump to content
pyroscott

Blackberry to cut side-loading of apps

Recommended Posts

In a "security move" RIM announced that future blackberry OS updates will stop the ability of users to side load apps. This will be similar to iOS which requires all apps to come from iTunes unless you have jailbroken the iOS product. RIM quoted security and piracy concerns since it is easier to regulate malware when everything goes through the marketplace, and Android piracy is estimated at nearly 25% of paid apps being pirated. Developers may show more interest if side loading is stopped since it will force consumers to purchase the app rather than pirate it.

 

Still, it was relatively easy to convert an APK to a BAR (the blackberry package installer) and sideload an Android app to your blackberry device. With blackberry's anemic supply of apps this kind of function might be a reason for someone to tolerate using a blackberry.

 

http://crackberry.com/future-blackberry-playbook-updates-eliminate-ability-side-load-applications-really-such-bad-thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RIM has since backtracked... "Looking at options"

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RIM has since backtracked... "Looking at options"

 

Probably a good thing to "look at options" when you have 10% of the apps in your market of other competing OS'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BUT, you have to keep developers happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Side loading is staying around...bb10.2 adds the ability to run 4.2.2 apps..:)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I'm saying that, given that LTE can do so already, doing so with 5G should be a cakewalk.
    • So what your saying is that 5G technology can replace some of this at a reasonable price?
    • Chocolate Cake

      Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

    • Satellite is less outdated than you think. ViaSat has 100 Mbps plans, albeit with a 150 GB soft cap. 50 Mbps is available for a relatively reasonable price, depending on area. Of course, there's still the speed-of-light problem. With that said, 25/3 with a 160GB cap, particularly if it's a soft cap, for like $60/mo,, would be straightforward to sling via 2.5 GHz 5G, and if advertised at all would give Sprint probablh 80% market share in anywhere that can't get cable or fiber. The number of places that can hit those speeds over DSL that can't get cable or fiber is low enough that you don't really have to worry about those folks (basically only rural telephone companies/co-ops do that).
    • Guess I'll be going back to Pixel-land for my next phone: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/andy-rubin-s-phone-maker-essential-is-said-to-consider-sale
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×