Jump to content
  • ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By nexuss4g
      Network bands (by model)
      4G LTE (Cat11 DL, Cat5 UL)
      CDMA / EVDO Rev A
      UMTS / HSPA+
      GSM / EDGE
      2G: GSM band 2/3/5/8
      CDMA BC 0/1/10
      3G: WCDMA band 1/2/4/5/8
      4G: FDD LTE band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/25/26/28/66
      TDD LTE band 38/41
       
      https://www.motorola.com/us/products/moto-x-gen-4
       
       
    • By haasbat
      Not sure if this has come up elsewhere, regarding the Moto X/M leak a few weeks ago (just move it if it has), but I can't seem to find any information on the SOC that is being reported. Only thing I seem to find is that it's Cat-6 compatible, but it doesn't appear that this chipset is used in any existing Sprint phones (or other US phone, seems only to be overseas) to get an idea of how well the radios work and what the connectivity would be like.
       
      https://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx40&os=Android&api=gl&D=Motorola+XT1663&testgroup=info
       
      Obviously, it would only have 2-band CA as well as other limitations, but do we have anything comparable to this to give us an idea if we should be watching for a mid-range phone that will be hitting above its weight class? Or should we all just suck it up and go with the next Nexus and the Snapdragon 82X? I'm really gunning for the 4.6" Moto, but if the reception is lacking (whether LTE or WiFi), or it's not Sprint LTE Plus compatible, I'd rather just not waste my time. I'm still rocking my 2013 Moto X, I just really wish it were LTE Plus at this point, with a little bit better RAM management.
    • By nexuss4g
      The Moto G also unlocked with full Sprint support
       
      Moto G—XT1625
      CDMA (850, 1900 MHz)
      GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
      UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz)
      4G LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41)
      Band coverage varies by model, country, and carrier.
       
      http://www.motorola.com/us/products/moto-g
    • By Geesmill
      Verge video on Moto's new headquarters and the upcoming 360 wearable.
       

  • Posts

    • You don't. I don't. Others do. It's also plug and play. People love that.  Covering a house with WiFi is cheapish. But still not free. And these are meant for more than just houses.  A business blocks access to WiFi or has consent pages to protect themselves and their network. If they are a Sprint customer or have a lot of Sprint users, a MB is a free way to cover your building/office area. Every place I have ever worked blocks or has guest captive portal on WiFi. Yet still have a DAS.  It's isn't a way to abuse the network, it's a way to waste Sprints financial resources (people who don't need it but want to use it like me).
    • Hummmn, they are still using the old nTelos SID on 1x.
    • Don't know.  I was barreling down the highway at the time I took the picture, and I don't usually do speed tests anyway.  But considering the available speed used to be zero, I'm going to say it's decent, sure. On my way home today, I'm going to take a long route to check on some more sites I don't usually go by.  Expect the Premiere map to fill in some after I get home.  (Also, I'm amused that with yesterday's update to the Sprint coverage map, the Red House tower that's on the air is now missing from the map along with the Hat Creek tower, while the Sugar Hill site that had no antennas two weeks ago is still present.) - Trip
    • Because you simply have to plug it in to a power outlet near a window. 
    • Except for a soft hand off to thw macro network. It can't do that, but other than that, there exactly the same. 
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×