Jump to content
lilotimz

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

I think it would be great if Sprint could pick some spectrum in the CBRS band—I could definitely see their NR network being primarily 2.5/3.5 GHz. Additionally, if CBRS spectrum were used for NR with massive MIMO, it would be a good overlay for the L1900 grid as it would have comparable coverage/range. 

Your point about roaming is definitely true too. It would be nice for us to roam in other countries on the same band as back home; additionally, with spectrum that lines up with international providers, Sprint may be able to break into the US international roaming market (which AT&T and T-Mobile primarily dominate today). 

 

1 hour ago, Fraydog said:

As it is, it’s time for Sprint to be active in spectrum auctions again. mmWave and CBRS are all needed.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

 

In the interview that Sprint's new CFO did today, he said that Sprint is content with what it has right now and doesn't see itself buying mmWave but if spectrum comes up for auction (non mmWave), Sprint will consider it. I think that's good news!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:

 

In the interview that Sprint's new CFO did today, he said that Sprint is content with what it has right now and doesn't see itself buying mmWave but if spectrum comes up for auction (non mmWave), Sprint will consider it. I think that's good news!

Hmm...spectrum that could come up for auction that isn’t mmWave...wonder what that could be 😏…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, RAvirani said:

Hmm...spectrum that could come up for auction that isn’t mmWave...wonder what that could be 😏…

Sorry... what would it be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Sorry... what would it be?

According to FierceWireless Ajit Pai mentioned earlier this year that he is trying to auction off 28Ghz spectrum this November and that in the coming months he "intends to propose the next steps needed to make the 3.7 to 4.2 GHz band available for commercial terrestrial use"

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Sorry... what would it be?

cmWave of course ;) .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎3‎/‎3‎/‎2018 at 2:18 PM, Fraydog said:

 


Isn’t Sprint faster in Chicago? I have friends up there and they seem to be saying Sprint has been faster there for a while.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Sorry about my late reply. My online reading S4GRU has been very limited the past few months.

Sprint has been advertising using Schaumburg in their Chicago speed test examples. While I'm sure Sprint service in Schaumburg has improved throughout the past few years since I had Sprint, I was very impressed by it in Schaumburg back then, just not so much in some other areas. By now it looks like Sprint is doing really well around here, which is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry about my late reply. My online reading S4GRU has been very limited the past few months.
Sprint has been advertising using Schaumburg in their Chicago speed test examples. While I'm sure Sprint service in Schaumburg has improved throughout the past few years since I had Sprint, I was very impressed by it in Schaumburg back then, just not so much in some other areas. By now it looks like Sprint is doing really well around here, which is good.
T-Mobile has some Wicked speeds.3239ecaedb78f36a70eb47fedd177b0e.jpg

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of these speedtests by all of these carriers are great. What I am looking for is consistent coverage and consistent speeds. It does not help me if in one spot it's 150Mbits and then in another 3G. I would be perfectly happy if it was consistently between 10-20Mbits throughout the coverage area.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/20/2018 at 11:33 AM, bigsnake49 said:

All of these speedtests by all of these carriers are great. What I am looking for is consistent coverage and consistent speeds. It does not help me if in one spot it's 150Mbits and then in another 3G. I would be perfectly happy if it was consistently between 10-20Mbits throughout the coverage area.

T-Mobile just upgraded the only stealth site in town and gave it tri band lte...4X4 MIMO and 256 QAM...the signal at the coverage edge is a bit dirty but it works none the less.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, danlodish345 said:

TMobile has a gotten good..

Screenshot_20180407-030305_Speedtest.jpg

I like that ping. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like that ping. 
Yeah the thing is really low which is amazing. It used to be in the mid-forties about a year ago. So they've gotten better.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sigh...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sigh...

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


What's the problem?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's the problem?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Those speeds are making me envious lol. We are still waiting on a site they've been meaning to build for quite sometime, till then we can't expect those nice speeds.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Those speeds are making me envious lol. We are still waiting on a site they've been meaning to build for quite sometime, till then we can't expect those nice speeds.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Well the speeds aren't like that all over town and it's really only at night when the network is unloaded

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at times we can reach 20 between midnight and 6am. Other areas do pretty good despite the spectrum constraints in the Cincinnati market.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well at times we can reach 20 between midnight and 6am. Other areas do pretty good despite the spectrum constraints in the Cincinnati market.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk


Yes I understand where you're coming from is only 55 mega Hertz total over here

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes I understand where you're coming from is only 55 mega Hertz total over here

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Once they flip the switch on our 5mhz of B66 here in the area(which I hope it's soon) it should help.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Once they flip the switch on our 5mhz of B66 here in the area(which I hope it's soon) it should help.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

TMobile has come a very long way here but they still have a long way to go and terms of coverage and actual overall signal strength.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By DesignGuy
      Fierce has a poll posted... and is utilizing a bracket style contest to find out who their readers think is the most powerful person in the telecom industry. Between Marcelo and the pink clad Chihuahua of a man... I give it to Marcelo. I think the final winner should be Masa, it's is a name people know and will get to know more in the coming years worldwide. But for the current poll, it's an easy decision for me!  
       
      http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/vote-now-to-decide-who-most-powerful-person-u-s-telecom-industry
       
       
       
    • By lilotimz
      T-mobile Ericsson Cell Equipment
       
      For Ericsson markets t-mobile uses what is known as AIR antenna units which have the radio unit integrated with the antenna. This type of setup significantly reduces signal loss from the radio to the antenna since they're both practically next to each other and not sepearated by coax jumper cables like that of a remote radio unit.
       
      Basic Ericsson AIR21 setup
      (Note typically there are 2 Ericsson AIR per sector)

       

       

       
      Ericsson AIR21 + Band 12 700 mhz Equipment
       
      Note the addition of a new low band 700 mhz capable antenna + Ericsson RRUS11 B12 (remote radio units) in addition to new TMA (tower mounted amplifiers) connected to the AIR antenna. The new Ericsson RRUS11 B12 + Antenna addition is for tmobiles band 12 700mhz (L700) deployment. 

      (Credit: tmo.rocks)
       
      Credit for the photographs belong to whoever took it. You know who you are!
    • By derrph
      With the introduction of the new plans Sprint has announced. I told one of my friends about the $60 unlimited plan and she was shocked yet happy about it. She currently has T-Mobile and there has been times where my Sprint service has out performed her service even in the city with puling up information and out of town...well... you already know how that went. She was talking about switching and stuff but then she sent me a typical article bashing Sprint and I got irritated by it and I had to explain to her that Sprint is not bad at all. These articles are based on past experiences from 3+ years ago. I told her I'm pulling 60+ mbps on LTE but she's worried about Sprint being slow ( because of what she read). Guys give me some advice on persuading her to give Sprint a chance. 
       
      I feel like articles that are being posted is what keeps away customers.  It makes no sense that T-Mobiles 2g network is not spoken about when they are in the news for changes to plans and such. But good ol Sprint makes changes and articles that get posted rips Sprint apart for filth. 
    • By belusnecropolis
      http://ces.cnet.com/8301-35284_1-57616761/how-i-got-t-mobiles-ceo-kicked-out-of-at-ts-ces-party/
      Roger Cheng @cnet appears to have had the most fun out of this, it kind of wrote the story for him I guess, so there is that. Also, just noticed the extra title Q, that is gonna drive some people nuts today. Top lel.
    • By Paynefanbro
      Am I the only one that likes to look at Verizon's coverage comparison tool. I think it gives a good idea of a carrier's generalized coverage as far as those cities that have been announced. However, it takes a while for it to get updated. I look at Verizon's map and think, no one will ever build an LTE network of that size. When I look at T-Mobile, I see a spotty, spread out network. AT&T is also spotty with a few highways covered here and there. Sprint seems to be more put together as in even if it is spotty, they are in blobs rather than random remote areas.
       
      I've also found a few places that Sprint has coverage in but not Verizon such as in southern Texas.
       
      http://www.verizonwireless.com/wcms/consumer/4g-lte.html
  • Posts

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×