Jump to content

Moto X 2014 (was "Motorola IHDT56QA1")

NateC

By NateC
in Motorola

 Share

Recommended Posts

atomic50 Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

atomic50

Posted
Posted (edited)

This is definitely the Moto X (2014) and AT&T + Verizon Models.

 

Dimensions (soft feel model) 72.4 (width) x 140.8 (height) x 3.8-9.9 (thickness)

 

XT1095 / XT1097 (AT&T) GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz) 4G LTE (02, 03, 04, 05, 07, 17, 29) 

 

XT1096 (Verizon) GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); CDMA (850, 1900 MHz); 4G LTE (02, 03, 04, 07, 13)

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/moto-x-specs-2014

Edited by atomic50
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

atomic50
atomic50

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:   GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz); CDMA (850/19

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

Teaser article is on The Wall:   http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-373-teaser-x-marks-the-spot-for-the-first-sprint-ccarrpp-fully-compliant-handset/   AJ

S4GRU
S4GRU

Moto + case = 3x the EVO LTE reception without case   Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Posted Images

transitwatch889 Member Level: eHRPD

transitwatch889

Posted
Posted

The moto x with the leather back is nice. Too bad ATT and Verizon have the exclusive on moto maker. Hope it isn't too long. Moto could be a nice mini to my max device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
uecker87 Member Level: eHRPD

uecker87

Posted
Posted

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:

 

GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz);

UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz);

CDMA (850/1900 MHz);

4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41)

 

It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

 

Wait...  So this includes USCC's main band, B12?  Very nice if the rumored USCC LTE roaming deal comes along pretty soon!  :tu:

 

Also Motorola typically (at least in my past experiences) puts out devices with above average RF performance.  Hopefully this will be the same.  Depending on what else comes out this month or next, I may need to give this device some serious consideration.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cdk Member Level: 4G LTE

cdk

Posted
Posted

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:

 

4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41)

 

It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

 

Wait...  So this includes USCC's main band, B12?  Very nice if the rumored USCC LTE roaming deal comes along pretty soon!  :tu:

 

Also Motorola typically (at least in my past experiences) puts out devices with above average RF performance.  Hopefully this will be the same.  Depending on what else comes out this month or next, I may need to give this device some serious consideration.

 

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EvanA Member Level: 4G WiMax

EvanA

Posted
Posted

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

4 8 15 16 23 42
Link to comment
Share on other sites
uecker87 Member Level: eHRPD

uecker87

Posted
Posted

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

 

I know around here B12 is USCC's main LTE band, but they refarmed their 850 spectrum to also add on B5 for the iPhone.  In my particular county, USCC has a 10x10 chunk in B12 (700a and b - USCC is probably the sole reason why there isn't any native AT&T coverage since they grabbed 700b and the cellular A license), but only a 5x5 chunk for LTE in B5.  Either way, good news!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mc_gusto Member Level: 4G WiMax

mc_gusto

Posted
Posted

Is anybody else amazed at the quick charge? I had no idea this type of charging existed, or will. How does this not degrade the battery quicker... I need an adult...or a battery expert.

Really sounds amazing. But wondering what the catch is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
transitwatch889 Member Level: eHRPD

transitwatch889

Posted
Posted

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me. More concerned with battery. But the fast charge aspect is nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me.

 

Charge slowly, and carry a big stick.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
smorcy11 Member Level: 3G EVDO

smorcy11

Posted
Posted

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me. More concerned with battery. But the fast charge aspect is nice.

If Android L is actually 35+ pct more efficient battery then I don't know that the battery will be an issue.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ascertion Member Level: LTE Advanced

Ascertion

Posted
Posted

If Android L is actually 35+ pct more efficient battery then I don't know that the battery will be an issue.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

I know this, but why not just pack a larger battery like the rest of the competition? Imagine Android L with a 3000 mAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smorcy11 Member Level: 3G EVDO

smorcy11

Posted
Posted

I know this, but why not just pack a larger battery like the rest of the competition? Imagine Android L with a 3000 mAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

I agree. Does the S5 have that size. I thought it was 2500 mAh?

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • dkyeager
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • dkyeager
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Nissan Coupe
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...