rackhivee Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 Yeah, all of this sounds like you'll just have a better upload experience. It doesn't sound like it'll "increase" B41 coverage. Well band 41 coverage is limited by the reach of the upload signal, so if you can be farther away from the tower and still be able to upload then coverage increases. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clbowens Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 Oh, ok. I didn't know that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tengen31 Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 Well band 41 coverage is limited by the reach of the upload signal, so if you can be farther away from the tower and still be able to upload then coverage increases.I'm confused because, Sprint said it increases the signal to that of 1900mhz.. Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 I'm confused because, Sprint said it increases the signal to that of 1900mhz.. Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk There are no modifications at the tower. Usually your phone drops B41 at around -120 because the upload times out, even though the download may still be chugging along at 10-15 mbps. All HPUE does is increase the maximum upload power of the phone, allowing it to hold on to a much weaker signal without the upload failing. This perceived increase in range, because the phone will not drop B41 until a much weaker signal , brings its "range" almost to that of B25. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 I posted this in the El Paso thread , but this thread is a little more active. What are you guys thinking sprints completion rate is now .. there are 5 sites so far scheduled for modification I hoping they can at least get to 50 to 70 % completion rate by the summer.. is that obtainable Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derrph Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 I posted this in the El Paso thread , but this thread is a little more active. What are you guys thinking sprints completion rate is now .. there are 5 sites so far scheduled for modification I hoping they can at least get to 50 to 70 % completion rate by the summer.. is that obtainable Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk What is this pertaining to if you don't mind me asking? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 What is this pertaining to if you don't mind me asking? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk It should be adding band 41 Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derrph Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 It should be adding band 41 Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk Oh ok gotcha. I though it was dealing with small cells or something. Thanks for that! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbastard Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 Oh ok gotcha. I though it was dealing with small cells or something. Thanks for that! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk El Paso is probably one of the most forgotten markets for Sprint. Sprint has better coverage on I-10 East from El Paso to the Sierra Blanca checkpoint than both T-Mobile and At&t. I used to roam on Telcel back in the day with At&t on some stretches of I-10. Unfortunately for Sprint, they've suffered with no 800 LTE and delayed deployment of B41. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tengen31 Posted January 6, 2017 Share Posted January 6, 2017 El Paso is probably one of the most forgotten markets for Sprint. Sprint has better coverage on I-10 East from El Paso to the Sierra Blanca checkpoint than both T-Mobile and At&t. I used to roam on Telcel back in the day with At&t on some stretches of I-10. Unfortunately for Sprint, they've suffered with no 800 LTE and delayed deployment of B41. Sent from my 2PQ93 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 El Paso is probably one of the most forgotten markets for Sprint. Sprint has better coverage on I-10 East from El Paso to the Sierra Blanca checkpoint than both T-Mobile and At&t. I used to roam on Telcel back in the day with At&t on some stretches of I-10. Unfortunately for Sprint, they've suffered with no 800 LTE and delayed deployment of B41. I traveled to fort Stockton tx and sprint has much better coverage than T-Mobile Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 El Paso is probably one of the most forgotten markets for Sprint. Sprint has better coverage on I-10 East from El Paso to the Sierra Blanca checkpoint than both T-Mobile and At&t. I used to roam on Telcel back in the day with At&t on some stretches of I-10. Unfortunately for Sprint, they've suffered with no 800 LTE and delayed deployment of B41.[/quote I wonder how sprint will rebuild their brand here in El Paso... its been very bad here for years Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbastard Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 El Paso is probably one of the most forgotten markets for Sprint. Sprint has better coverage on I-10 East from El Paso to the Sierra Blanca checkpoint than both T-Mobile and At&t. I used to roam on Telcel back in the day with At&t on some stretches of I-10. Unfortunately for Sprint, they've suffered with no 800 LTE and delayed deployment of B41. I wonder how sprint will rebuild their brand here in El Paso... its been very bad here for years Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk They're going to have to wait for either small cells or B26 to get cleared before they start to rebuild their brand. Network just isn't where it needs to be compared to the competition. I used to get better speeds when I forced my GS5 to roam on Movistar over Sprint's LTE near the border. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 They're going to have to wait for either small cells or B26 to get cleared before they start to rebuild their brand. Network just isn't where it needs to be compared to the competition. I used to get better speeds when I forced my GS5 to roam on Movistar over Sprint's LTE near the border.. That funny ... I've done the same thing ... I think sprint is also way behind here on towers. They need to add a bunch more Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffDTD Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 I think im ready for the merger you guys. I want to get the hell away from Verizon and save some money too. And ill pay the same price for unlimited or a larger bucket, if some of the coverage pain points can be lessened. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 I think im ready for the merger you guys. I want to get the hell away from Verizon and save some money too. And ill pay the same price for unlimited or a larger bucket, if some of the coverage pain points can be lessened. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk If the merger happen your going to be paying the same price as you are for Verizon Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brynn0823 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 If the merger happen your going to be paying the same price as you are for Verizon Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk Doubt it. Canada has 3 carriers with cheapest prices. You're assuming that would be the case Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Doubt it. Canada has 3 carriers with cheapest prices. You're assuming that would be the case Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Ya but no one of them have 140 million subscribers. The highest in Canada has 10 million Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brynn0823 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Ya but no one of them have 140 million subscribers. The highest in Canada has 10 million Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk Both CEOs pride themselves on listening to the consumer. A larger number 3 gets the larger carriers to react faster not reverse Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyroned3222 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Both CEOs pride themselves on listening to the consumer. A larger number 3 gets the larger carriers to react faster not reverse I agree, but how will they manage all the combined stores ( rent).. all the combined employees.. all tower sites ( that pay a monthly rent ). That's a immediate increase in overhead ( a big one ) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brynn0823 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk You realize they can renegotiate tower deals right ? For cheaper costs. Multiple analysts have said this about a possible merger. It's cost saving no matter how you slice it Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brynn0823 Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 I'm aware. What's your point ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kg4icg Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Doubt it. Canada has 3 carriers with cheapest prices. You're assuming that would be the case Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk You do realise the big 3 networks in Canada aren't unlimited, are higher in cost and trying to chase the little guys out of town. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kg4icg Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 I'm aware. What's your point ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk No I hit quote on wrong person Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAvirani Posted January 7, 2017 Share Posted January 7, 2017 Doubt it. Canada has 3 carriers with cheapest prices. You're assuming that would be the case Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Maybe for you. $90 to $100 for 2GB of data and unlimited talk/text is not cheap in my book. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.