Jump to content

LTE battery life ??


bmattox79

Recommended Posts

Nope. That is either unrelated to LTE or an iPhone issue. The last few generations of Android devices have not experienced any significant battery drain due to LTE.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On iOS 6, If you go into Settings | General | Usage, it will show you the times since last full charge for Usage and Standby.  You could use this to compare and know for sure.

 

I'm very happy with my iPhone's battery life on LTE.  But I'm in Houston so the coverage is pretty good here.

 

If you are not in an LTE area, go to Settings | General | Cellular to turn off LTE.  I usually turn off LTE when going to the family farm to keep my iPhone 5 from searching for it in order to get better battery life.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is funny you bring this up, because I was just thinking about this the other day. My phone gets amazing battery life when its connected to an LTE signal.

Same here, when connected to LTE, my battery last longer than 3G. I think it probably has to do with the difference in speed, especially when all my accounts are syncing, it syncs faster over LTE, rather then just hang there trying to download slowly over 3G.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might affect your battery life at first. The weaker the signal you are connected to, the more power your phone uses (and thus, the faster the battery drains). If you're constantly connected to extremely weak and distant LTE sites, it might cause extra battery drain. However, that's going to be rare, and there are so many other things that could affect your battery life that I doubt you could pair it down. I say leave it on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turning off LTE when you do not have any LTE service in your area will not help your battery life at all. The LTE and 3G radios use the same chip, so there is no power savings by disabling LTE on the iPhone. Like WiWavelength stated this did not used to be the case with older Android phones, but now all recent phones use one chip for 3G and LTE.

 

That being said, if you do have LTE but very poor service turning off LTE can help boost battery life as your phone is not trying to connect to the poor LTE signal but instead a closer 3G signal.

 

Anandtech did a battery life test of the iPhone on LTE and 3G and found the iPhone battery life just about doubles when LTE service is available in the area: 

 

50475.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know while I'm in an no LTE coverage area if I have LTE enabled it smokes my battery life cause its constantly searching for it. Does it get better on battery when u have a steady LTE signal and isn't searching anymore?

 

In addition to what others have said, just because LTE is enabled doesn't mean your phone is constantly searching for it. It only runs occasional scans, with minimal impact on battery life. You either have a weak signal, or something else is wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can definitely say that what has a much bigger impact on my battery life is the speed and signal strength of my data connection. When I'm in ATL (where there is generally very plentiful LTE), I tend to get great battery life that easily smokes my 3G battery life. My GS3 doesn't really seem to lose anything from being left in CDMA/LTE mode and definitely isn't scanning that often to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea well my thunderbolt lte gets crappy battery life when on lte... /sarcasm

 

which is where this claim that lte gives and batteries dont mix well came from... once upon a time that was the case but not so much now like AJ said  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea well my thunderbolt lte gets crappy battery life when on lte... /sarcasm

 

which is where this claim that lte gives and batteries dont mix well came from... once upon a time that was the case but not so much now like AJ said  

 

The real issue was that a hodgepodge of 65 nm process chipsets, battery, and big screen did not mix well.  As airlinks, WiMAX and LTE had relatively little to do with the issue.  Thankfully, with chipset consolidation and 28 nm process, the problem has been largely solved.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically, my phone has done better for battery life in an LTE area than an EVDO area. But my phone doesn't constantly scan for LTE and kill my battery life, my phone scans for a better EVDO signal to attach to, but never finds it when needed because there is too much to interfere in between me and the local Sprint site to get a better signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...