Jump to content

Airave Owners


Recommended Posts

I think certain phones just don't jive well with the Airave.  It was like that back in 2008 and even with the supposedly improved models there remains issues with some phones.  My LG Optimus G absolutely won't connect to it.  Once in a while it sees the PN offset of the Airave (debug engineering screen shows this) but it immediately rejects it and goes back to the regular network even though the Airave signal is stronger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I'm having issues with the airave.. i can receive texts no issue, but when sending them it just won't happen. looks like I'm going to have to make a call to airave support and see whats happening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Can someone explain why my galaxy note 2 reconnect to cell tower after hanging up a call? The phone was connected to airave 2.5 plus before the call, and during the call (according to the signal strength), but immediately reconnects to cell tower after the call. It will take a while for it to reconnect to airave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone explain why my galaxy note 2 reconnect to cell tower after hanging up a call? The phone was connected to airave 2.5 plus before the call, and during the call (according to the signal strength), but immediately reconnects to cell tower after the call. It will take a while for it to reconnect to airave.

What PRL are you using? If you're using a custom one, I find that it does exactly as you mentioned with my Airave 2.5.

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 HD.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What PRL are you using? If you're using a custom one, I find that it does exactly as you mentioned with my Airave 2.5.

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 HD.

I am using a customized PRL based on 55016. I would use 2011 if I can find it. I inserted one line on top of the same NID in my neighborhood, to give my airave "more" priority, following this post http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2440-airave-evo-4g-lte-data-connection-but-not-voice/&do=findComment&comment=60555.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am using a customized PRL based on 55016. I would use 2011 if I can find it. I inserted one line on top of the same NID in my neighborhood, to give my airave "more" priority, following this post http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2440-airave-evo-4g-lte-data-connection-but-not-voice/&do=findComment&comment=60555.

Doing a PRL update doesn't give you 2011?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Note 10.1 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...